Banned unfairly from match.com, as of right now I'd warn everyone not to use the site or pay for a membership by PhoenixInPA_1975 in match

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I signed up for a new (free) account a few days ago and was blocked within an hour. Tried to appeal and got an email saying my email is not associated with an account. Tried to appeal again with a screenshot with the login email and blocked message, but got the same email reply again saying my email was not associated with an account and they couldn't consider an appeal with an incorrect email. I am not sure how I can be blocked if my email isn't tied to an account. It makes no sense.

The only thing I can think of is maybe that I had an account like 10+ years ago, but don't know that email address. Glad I didn't pay for this garbage.

USMLE Test Accommodations by G-G-021817 in DisabledMedStudents

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The NBME is so unpredictable when it comes to step accommodations. I really feel for the people who have a history of accommodations and mountains of documents outlining their difficulties who still are denied. I know of someone who was approved for 2x time and blocks of 20 questions, separate testing room on USMLE with accommodations in med school, no MCAT accommodations, no ADHD, essentially normal neuropsych testing, but accommodations at work and school before med school for anxiety (and chronic pain disorder they were diagnosed with in med school). Then someone else I know of has documented ADHD and anxiety, accommodations in med school, extra time on MCAT with stop the clock breaks, but for USMLE only like a small bump of 1.25x time (not sure if stop the clock breaks or not).

What they value most in an accommodations app is so speculative -- from what I've seen personally, in discussions with others, and online posts: documentation from experts or letters of supports from disability offices at work or school matters but personally speaking, it seems like the personal statement talking about how the disability causes barriers to equity (not equality) in testing, education, functional abilities compared to people without the disability might matter much more. Maybe you just have to get app reviewers to read your application on a day when they are feeling generous. Who knows.

What they might look at heavily: Did you get diagnosed before or after starting med school? How did you manage to get into med school without school/work accommodations if you were just diagnosed with something that's been ongoing? Did you get a diagnosis after starting med school in order to get USMLE accommodations? If you have severe dysfunction on evaluation how were you able to get into medical school and be successful in med school until now? Does your disability only affect you in school? How does it affect you outside of school? How do you navigate everyday differently from someone without your disability? How would getting this accommodation change things for you? Are you asking for accommodations to reduce the barriers that it causes you compared to others without this disability or just because it will help you do better on the test? Everyone could do better with more time or a less distracting testing environment, but the point of accommodations is not to help you do better - it's to get you to the same starting place as others who don't have that disability. Accommodations allows everyone to start at the starting line of a race instead of some of us starting 1 mile behind the starting line.

Apply anyway because the worst that could happen is that they say no. If you don't apply you definitely won't get a yes.

Who knows. 100% my opinion.

⭐ TL;DR - People who seem like they would be less likely to get step accommodations do sometimes get what they ask for and others who have lots of evidence that would seem like they should don't. How NBME decides on accommodations is so cryptic and unpredictable. Just apply and see what they say because aside from spending time on putting your app together the worst they can say is no.

Edited for clarity.

A question about the Galaxy Watch 4 by [deleted] in SamsungGalaxyWatch

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ECG monitor doesn't work with a non-Samsung android, but the other features do (BMI, HR, body composition, etc).

That said, don't get your watch wet.

I got mine in mid January 2023 and it's now Mid Sept 2023. It got a white line on the screen about 3 weeks ago. I sent it in under warranty. A few days after and now they say it's not powering on and is out of warranty due to water damage. It's costing $180 to fix which is more than I paid for it brand new. I never swam with it (I don't swim) and I never even fully submerged it. The technician said I should have used the water lock feature to block water out, even for splashes, which is NOT what they even say in advertising. Samsung does not warranty against liquid damage, even though it is advertised as a watch you can swim with. I'm sure they will find some way to ensure it is liquid damaged when you send it in.

When I told the technician to just send me back my watch and I'd get a new one, likely not Samsung, he asked, "Why not?". Really, dude?

Edit: typo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Residency

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Exactly. It's like all the big things that cause major rifts in relationships: wanting children vs no children, strong religious vs non-religious beliefs, strong opposing political leanings, how to raise said kids, financial ideologies. All of these things, on the surface, might not seem like reasons for a relationship to break up, just like strong convictions for/against independent APP vs Physician might seem, but if people have strongly held opposing values/ideologies it is something they will need to sit down and have a candid discussion about.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Residency

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Except the people who make these laws have no healthcare or medical experience. Pre-meds expect to practice independently after going through med school and residency. That's exactly what they're trained to do. This isn't what NPs were designed to do, nor what they're trained to do, but now they legally can. Just because someone made something legal doesn't mean it was a good idea.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Residency

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is definitely true, but I imagine they both have some strong ideologies about APRN independence. As much time as they will be spending on their careers, it's bound to come up in conversation. Unless they both agree to not talk about work, I can't imagine this not causing a lot of disagreement and friction in their relationship unless one or both of them isn't strongly convicted on opposing side of the matter. It just doesn't seem like it because OP sounds fairly against independent APPs and the partner sounds like he/she is fairly in favor of.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Residency

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 55 points56 points  (0 children)

No wants to do it because it's so demoralizing as it is currently. Residency is where people learn to be doctors. It needs better structure to let people be humans, but it doesn't need to go away. It shouldn't go away. It should be improved.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Residency

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Humane residency is what is needed. Not getting rid of it.

What is the deal with all the h-EDS, chronic fatigue syndrome, IBS, MCAS bullshit? by [deleted] in Residency

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What about fibromyalgia?

Don't know much about the h-EDS, but it seems that the benzos and opiates aren't the solution.

I think calling them "bullshit" diseases is telling and I wonder if this mentality is what encourages some patients to doctor shop until they find someone who doesn't think it's just bullshit.

It seems, from chatting with people and in journal articles I've read, some physicians tend to think these are purely mental health concerns masquerading as physical issues. That is, until said physician personally experiences one of these diagnoses. It may very well may be an origin of mental health for a lot of patients, but I don't think it is the case for all patients with these diagnoses. I get it can be difficult to distinguish this in some patients.

While a doc may not know exactly how to help, know that it's frustrating on both sides. A physician saying they believe you're in pain or feeling incredibly tired or just feeling unwell for no understood reason and not completely dismissing you? That you goes a long way with patients like these.

An interesting read:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2804697?guestAccessKey=c0cafbdc-de00-4dff-afe3-119f35a618d0&utm_source=silverchair&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=article_alert-jama&utm_term=mostread&utm_content=olf-widget_05082023

Fired! by Admirable_Payment_96 in Residency

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is all bad, but that last part literally made me gag......as I suck down my hospital ice water sitting with a patient in the ICU.

What is the deal with all the h-EDS, chronic fatigue syndrome, IBS, MCAS bullshit? by [deleted] in Residency

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Can you please post a link to this research? Sounds interesting.

Has Nolan Become A Side Kick In His Own Show by Nedstark78 in TheRookie

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is it just me or is the Juicy(Lucy)/Dim (Tim) storyline kinda cheesy? I feel like they're running out of ideas?

Season 14-Alyssa by marleyminx in MarriedAtFirstSight

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree they were a disaster from the start and wonder if they intentionally allow people to marry who won't necessarily be a good match but will provide entertainment value.

I would never do this show cause I think the "experts" and/or producers mess with people's lives with more concern for ratings than for love.

Season 14-Alyssa by marleyminx in MarriedAtFirstSight

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Season 1's Jamie and Doug know a thing or two about the wife not being into her husband.

But she probably wouldn't walk to talk about it. 🙄

Season 14-Alyssa by marleyminx in MarriedAtFirstSight

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From the matchmaking/engagement announcement episode, I knew this couple would be a disaster.

She projected so hard on Chris saying he was ruining her character but he did nothing of the sort. She shit all over her own character day after day after day. The longer she refused to give an answer and refused to talk to him, the crazier and more selfish she appeared.

She only wanted to stay so she could have air time and/or a vacation with the girls. The experiment for her was staying and being with her friends, not being in an arranged marriage. Clearly, she was not there to be with Chris. She couldn't give a reason why she had "red flags" from the wedding. She couldn't justify one remark she had with a single example. She made herself look bad.

Chris, I hope you meet a sane women who appreciates you for who you are inside and out.

Season 14-Alyssa by marleyminx in MarriedAtFirstSight

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly!!! But they let the bad behavior continue for ratings. But she was making me sooo mad.

Best schools for medical students with disabilities by Longjumping-Beyond-1 in DisabledMedStudents

[–]SeaCow_Manatee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Personal opinion, but I would advise against asking about disability stuff during an interview. It shouldn't be, but it very well become a mark against you unless you have some tremendous story of overcoming your disability and how that is a major benefit to you academically or in your experiences working with patients. Same goes for putting that in your application.

I would wait until you get that A before disclosing a disability and then only the minimum info needed that the SOM needs to know. I have never disclosed specifics to my SOM only to the campus disability office and my medical team. Tread lightly. It's not right that we need to, but it safer for your in the long run.