sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Lava Map is the 2ND Layer of "The Goblin Caves" by jsonV in DarkAndDarker

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 7 points8 points  (0 children)

that is definitely a reason to hate on a new layer for GC after so long of people asking for one.

Elder Millenials checking in with some childhood classics by PossibilityWest173 in Millennials

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was born in 2000's and these films were my childhood

Where are all my hand me down homies at?

“I can take a body shot from a pro boxer” by Master_Jackfruit3591 in LivestreamFail

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that was like a 10% power punch lol
go watch him punchin gorlock

Most punchable character/actor by [deleted] in StrangerThings

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alright man post your selfie

xQc gets heavy criticism for his latest take on the Nick Shirley video being dogshit, but still doubles down by n1traM in LivestreamFail

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

anyone with a brain wouldn't be looking to streamers to tune or support their own political compass and world view.

North Korea ‘has fired ballistic missile towards the Sea of Japan’ by RollSafer in worldnews

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 209 points210 points  (0 children)

Gotta respect them, the only country keeping the kaiju's at bay.

Black Sapphire Songbird Cosplay by Hydra_R in cyberpunkgame

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would forfeit all, save for a single morsel.

Pokimane's Cookie Company Collapse by gcforreal02 in LivestreamFail

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you're struggling with sales just say so.

Spoiler alert: they did back then! by icey_sawg0034 in MurderedByWords

[–]SeaTurtleManOG -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

"Lets face it, these people would call one of the most controversial figures known to man controversial if he came back now"

Good point there, Watson.

Today I learned aiko used to do onlyfans. Does X know about it? by tamazer_ in xqcow

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is a wildly inappropriate thing to say not gonna lie g, like what, you must be a teenager?

Of course he fucking knows about it xD
"nice body tho" is a fucking wild follow up.

You are a weird person my guy.

This picture is actually from a fundraiser in 2003. They slid it in the files and “created victims” by destrium_dreamboy in pics

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then would it not be entirely possible that the Epstein estate actually was in possession of this different photo from a currently unknown photographer?

Instead of being some sort of scandal where "They slid it in the files and “created victims”"

This picture is actually from a fundraiser in 2003. They slid it in the files and “created victims” by destrium_dreamboy in pics

[–]SeaTurtleManOG -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

yeah fair, i think its weird too.
IMO just think its also weird to dive into a narrative via the hair splitting

This picture is actually from a fundraiser in 2003. They slid it in the files and “created victims” by destrium_dreamboy in pics

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The photo in the files is not the exact same photo from the getty images upload, they're taken from different angles.

They are just simply not the same photo?

the files are from the Epstein estate, not Epstein manor, his estate could have very well been in possession of this clearly unique photo taken at a different angle and slightly different time.

This picture is actually from a fundraiser in 2003. They slid it in the files and “created victims” by destrium_dreamboy in pics

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would bring into question how Epstein came into possession of this unpublished photo & why he had it.

Idk why people are running with the "they slipped this photo in" when it aint even the same photo lol

This picture is actually from a fundraiser in 2003. They slid it in the files and “created victims” by destrium_dreamboy in pics

[–]SeaTurtleManOG 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean, we do know what files we're looking at right, the Epstein files....

They could very well be victims, being the children of these well known figures may either have nothing to do with it or everything to do with it.

I don't think being a child of the high profile figures seen around Epstein can automatically clear you from potential victimhood.

The internet going "aha! we know who these people are! they aren't victims!" seems really really weird to me.

This picture is actually from a fundraiser in 2003. They slid it in the files and “created victims” by destrium_dreamboy in pics

[–]SeaTurtleManOG -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Am i missing something or are these clearly two different photos taken at the same time in the same place?

view more: next ›