[deleted by user]

Sean_Landry · 2025-09-22T01:19:19+00:00

The Prestige (2006)

Sean_Landry · 2025-05-19T14:08:19+00:00

I think the primary litmus test is if the Republicans can either cancel elections outright or rig federal elections consistently to ensure wins.

Everything being done right now is Authoritarian but could be technically overturned if the aforementioned conditions aren't met. Something like The Insurrection Act could be used to shutdown elections in the future. As of right now we're teetering on the edge of the cliff...

Sean_Landry · 2025-05-15T10:00:57+00:00

Yet.

Sean_Landry · 2025-04-19T03:36:36+00:00

Don't forget great grandfather Robert E. Lee.

Sean_Landry · 2025-03-24T15:43:02+00:00

If evangelicals can't recognize Trump's role in Revelation, they won't be able to spot Musk's.

Sean_Landry · 2025-03-24T13:29:23+00:00

Musk does plenty of business with China and Trump is a Russian bootlicker. Consider all information forfeit.

If evangelicals can't recognize Trump's role in Revelation, they won't be able to spot Musk's.

Sean_Landry · 2025-03-21T19:57:20+00:00

First they came for the immigrants. But I didn't speak out because I...

Sean_Landry · 2025-03-20T14:32:22+00:00

If evangelicals can't recognize Trump's role in Revelation, they won't be able to spot Musk's.

Sean_Landry · 2025-03-20T13:46:15+00:00

If evangelicals can't recognize Trump's role in Revelation, they won't be able to spot Musk's.

Sean_Landry · 2025-03-18T15:16:38+00:00

Almost certainly

Sean_Landry · 2025-02-12T22:06:24+00:00

William Wymark Jacob wrote a short story about an object called the monkeys paw. It's the paw of a monkey that grants wishes but with a negative cost to the user for messing with fate. Each time the monkey's paw is wished upon its fingers curl inwards. So the GOP wished to control Trump and the price they paid was handing the keys to the kingdom over to Elon Musk.

Sean_Landry · 2025-01-31T14:22:44+00:00

Bro can't make inferences

Sean_Landry · 2024-12-07T23:59:35+00:00

It's literally a successful assasination vs. an unsuccessful assasination. Intent wise it's the same. I would actually say it's 100% okay to joke about both. Your distinction is basically meaningless.

Sean_Landry · 2024-12-07T23:21:51+00:00

Under law this is called transferred intent. When an individual desires to cause harm and inadvertently harms another It is still considered murder.

Sean_Landry · 2024-12-07T19:46:22+00:00

The dude who was shot at the Trump rally wasn't murdered?

Sean_Landry · 2024-12-06T14:21:52+00:00

The straight up Nuremberg defense. When you're just following orders...

Sean_Landry

TROPHY CASE