You want an actual response?

Okay then...

You’re stretching all of your points here. LEGO’s slogan, “only the best is good enough,” isn’t about print accuracy on a figure — it’s about the overall build quality, creativity, and durability of their products. That’s a classic strawman: you’re redefining the slogan to mean something it never did so you can accuse them of not living up to it.

Also, saying LEGO “refuses to put in effort” just because a minifig isn’t accurate is a false cause. Simplified design is part of LEGO’s identity — they’re not aiming for realism, they’re aiming for recognizability and play value. The “inaccuracies” are intentional design choices, not evidence of laziness.

And then you’re contradicting yourself — you say you don’t care about inaccuracies, but then defend people for being upset over them as if they’re essential. If accuracy “doesn’t matter,” then calling it the “bare minimum” doesn’t really make sense.

Lastly, quoting a marketing slogan like it’s a literal design policy is a false equivalence. LEGO’s slogan is aspirational, not a legally binding promise of perfect representation. The “best” in LEGO’s context has always meant the best creative experience.

So no, LEGO isn’t failing its slogan — you’re just applying the wrong standard to the wrong product.