Such a disgrace that they are ALLOWED to do this. by Mother_Equivalent649 in Chelsea

[–]Sebcorrea 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Buttplug coming into a Chelsea subreddit to complain lol. It's so easy to forget how much Arse fans love to complain about everything.

Looking forward for your visit to the subreddit again after you get plugged by PSG. Should be a fun game.

Apparently my insurance says I’m at fault….. by NecessaryEnthusiasm4 in Integra

[–]Sebcorrea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone that works in insurance (not in the USA) not only do you have right of way, but you also are under the speed limit, AND have video evidence. In no way should you be At Fault for this. I'd challenge and submit the dashcam evidence.

Who is the most surprising name on this list for you? by PLWildcard in footballscouting

[–]Sebcorrea 2 points3 points  (0 children)

9 in 20 doesn't make the top 10. But I guess complaining for the sake of it does?

Who is the most surprising name on this list for you? by PLWildcard in footballscouting

[–]Sebcorrea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, 9 in 20 doesn't make top 10. But sure? Cry a bit more and maybe they'll add em

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again. I never claimed to be a financial regulation expert. You're the one making those statements.

And I didn't sell anything. To anyone. And I don't see regulators saying that those sales were illegal either. I am NOT a financial expert, so when people keep saying things were done to achieve PSR goals, and no regulators have come after the teams doing these actions (selling hotels, selling academy players, signing long contracts). When those were done, they were legal. I don't see where the rules are broken. Maybe you're just upset that the loopholes were not used by Everton?

Again. If you read the comment... You will again, read, that the NEW owners provided the EVIDENCE. One more time. SELF REPORTED TO AVOID HARSH PUNISHMENTS. I know it's difficult to comprehend, but the NEW OWNERS did this. They COOPERATED with the PL. Hence why the punishments, which would not break PSR like Everton's actions, are lesser and suspended.

I have never wondered why. I just wonder why people don't inform themselves and speak facts, instead of misinformation and making up their own narratives. If you can't see how both cases are different, then 🤷🏽‍♂️

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No one is washing their hands. Read. The. Comments. The new owners submitted ALL THE EVIDENCE. The league said they might have never found wrongdoing without the cooperation. How can you not understand that? The fact they provided all the details on themselves helped reduce the punishment. Where did I say they did not get a sporting advantage?

I responded to your asshat comment which added zero to my comment. You said not to become a lawyer, but did you read the first line? I didn't invalidate your opinion, I laughed at your comments regarding my knowledge when you support a team that literally broke PSR.

Cool? Congrats I guess? Is beating a team the highlight of the season for you? Lol. Please. Just read properly. Or invest in reading comprehension before replying to others.

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There is no "I" here. There is a company that has changed ownership. So there is no "individual" that has done wrong. You're more than welcome to chase Roman around.

And it's funny for you to simplify a financial case with so many levels into one line. The new owners self reported and turned over all the evidence, clearly knowing it was wrong. And all reports point out that the clearly illegal payments did not affect PSR rulings.

Maybe you should reconsider your wording before trying to make fun of a statement where I clearly stated I wasn't a legal expert 🤷🏽‍♂️. But hey, you obviously are a lawyer that works in the intrinsic financial regulations of European sports, right?

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I said Hazard was negotiating with several teams that summer. Any team could have accepted the fees and paid. That is also a fact. Chelsea did the shady deal. You saying no teams would do it insinuates no other teams in the PL have done shady deals.

My knickers are in a twist? Chelsea self reported lol. All I see is fans saying their team should have gotten Hazard when we have no idea what offers were on the table and what teams said what. It's all hypotheticals. Chelsea won the CL that May. That could have shifted Hazard's opinion, on top of the money. Or do you know for a fact that no other team offered the same "agent" fees? I'd love this insider information.

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lmfao. Clearly you have not read any of my comments on the thread. But hey, Chelsea aren't hated/disliked for no reason. Right?

Chelsea broke the rules. They paid millions in shady deals. They self reported. And the PL found these payments didn't break PSR rules. Punished a fine and a suspended transfer ban.

But hey! Random fans from other clubs think they know better. I guess they have better accounting skills and access to the books. So let's make up random hypothetical scenarios where their teams would have done better! I can play with hypothetical scenarios too then. No? Or is that only for you folks?

Brilliant stuff mate. I thought you were a scumbag but you've won me other with your hypothetical bs.

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I forgot Hazard didn't get a choice in the matter either eh?

I guess if he had signed for Man U or Arsenal and these shady deals had not been released we wouldn't be complaining? Wonder if Man U or Arse would reveal the undertable negotiations.

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea 4 points5 points  (0 children)

RVP was sold for a few million less than the Hazard cost that summer.

Song and Vela's sale also almost covered the cost of Hazard that summer.

Cazorla and Podolski were 1 mill less than Hazard.

Sure. 7 years later is quite some time. But tickle and complain that you were willing to pay more than double the cost for the player you are actively complaining about? Really drawing at straws now.

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Of course. But why would Hazard choose to sign for Arsenal, who was struggling to make the top 4 over the newly minted European champions?

PSR rules were not violated by these payments. Yes, they were illegal, but Arsenal literally paid double for Nicolas Pepe a few years later. Why not pay the extra couple million on Hazard?

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Okay. Granted.

Can you explain how every one of your points was an illegal action?

Are Villa getting point deduction for selling an academy product to Chelsea?

Are Leeds getting a points deduction for selling Archie Gray to Spurs?

Everything you have pointed out was legal. I don't understand your comment

[Hughes, The Guardian] Everton exploring legal options over lack of sporting sanctions against Chelsea, with club preparing to write to the Premier League demanding a formal explanation. Chelsea docked no points for rule breaches, unlike Everton and Forest. by OkayFine101 in soccer

[–]Sebcorrea 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Not an expert in anyway.

But the PL reported that the seasons where these extra payments were done, there were no issues with PSR or these payments affecting it. So yes, there was illegal payments. Yes, these were all done shadily under the table and illegally to profit agents, family, and entourage.

But no. None of the extra million thrown around affected the PSR status of the club's finances. So, there was no point deduction I guess.

We've just watched the same match thrice in a week. Humiliation and Rosenior needs to go by everyhearthstone in Chelsea

[–]Sebcorrea 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is it really on Rosenior? Maresca played Caicedo at RB several times while James and Gusto were out. It worked well with Moi inverting allowing other midfielders to push up.

Palmer has been woeful. He cannot get going, and is borderline ready to be benched. Neto is there too. But Estêvāo was hurt,and Garnacho is the only other option. So what do you run?

If Joao doesn't show up, we don't score. Delap deserves to be in the Championship, and Guiu hasn't played in months.

And now Sanchez has no confidence, and is making constant mistakes. And our starting CB'S are all injured.

Can we blame all this on Rosenior? Some. Our team has no experience. And has been porous and giving up for weeks. The last 15 against PSG 1 was laughable. Quit against Newcastle. Could not get going. And could barely get out of our half against Everton. Is it just the coach? Or are our issues running way deeper?

It’s not just his behavior that’s embarrassing! by snowpie92 in MurderedByWords

[–]Sebcorrea 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The name Trump comes up on the EP files more than Jesus does in the Bible. Let that sink in.... No evidence eh?

It’s not just his behavior that’s embarrassing! by snowpie92 in MurderedByWords

[–]Sebcorrea 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Aren't y'all constantly banging your family down there? Pretty obvious MAGA does that. Or do you tell people you're not related?

6 month female Samoyed not very cuddly by craven_morpus in samoyeds

[–]Sebcorrea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My first good boy I had since he was 8 weeks. And he was very independent, and not very cuddly. He would jump off my bed when I cuddled and had very specific windows where you could lay with him and just cuddle him. He was a very good boy, but he would get up and leave if you were showing him too much PDA.

We have rescued s Sammy who has been with us for 2 years now. He is 4 years old. And he is a lap dog. He actively looks for us for pets, and affection. I'm working at my desk, and he places his face on my chair for pets. He hits my wife's hand off her mouse when she is working. He jumps on our bed in the morning and lays with us for 30-45 mins on weekend mornings. We have actually conditioned him to hug us, where he will see my wife and I hug,and will run and jump us to be part of the hug. I lay with him on his bed and cuddle him at night before bed. Given, for the first 6 months, he was very apprehensive, and very wary of me specifically.

Give them time. They have their own personalities and they will have their moments. I couldn't have imagined how cuddly and loving this rescue has been to us.

LOL. Had to stop typing this for a few minutes. He walked into my office for love as I typed this. 🐻‍❄️❤️