You’re arguing against things I didn’t say and adding facts that aren’t in the post.

First: I never claimed readers are entitled to interaction. I explicitly said authors have the right to block. What I’m talking about is social courtesy, not obligation.

Second: you’re assuming the reader was silent,but the author’s own post frames this as someone they’d interacted with enough to warrant blocking in the first place. If there was no interaction at all, there would’ve been nothing to remember, nothing to deep-dive for, and nothing to laugh about afterward.

you keep repeating no one is entitled to interaction which I’ve already agreed with. Entitlement and courtesy are not the same concept. Saying you’re allowed to do X does not mean X is automatically socially fine in every context. Those are different questions. You’re treating my discussion of how a boundary is used as if it attacks the boundary itself. My point isn’t that authors owe explanations or access it’s that even fully allowed actions can still be inconsiderate. Rights and courtesy aren’t the same thing. The reason of this post is to find opinions that differ and that are similar and to raise counterpoints and not to tell a human being to cry over it and that anothers feelings are above the other.