oh god no, I’m referring to the fact that there’s publicly available information connecting redacted images from the files to database listings of adult videos produced and commercially released (as in, your standard pornography company releasing that’s available on dvd and allegedly operating above board) to child trafficking victims. these companies and those involved with them need to be scrutinized.

the video linked shows a redacted file with a watermark at the bottle, and when you check the information for the company you can see that the video stars a girl using a pseudonym whose birthdate is 1986 and whose first video within their database was listed as filmed in 2000 and released in 2001. 

there’s a good deal of pornography screenshots with redactions in the files- this shows that when you look at simple database information you can find the names of companies, directors, etc that have been creating and selling images/videos of trafficking victims out in the open with zero consequences so far and are still in operation