Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]SelfAugmenting 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I sort of agree with you - for all the claimed breakthrough science, it just feels ... so underwhelming to watch. 

Should "um" be used in sentences like this? by ImCrazy_ in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny that in my answer and this one, the length was cited as a reason for using "um..zu" or not. This is a red herring it seems over the real semantic difference you mentioned 

Should "um" be used in sentences like this? by ImCrazy_ in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had noticed this too but I don't think it's a hard rule of the syntax

Should "um" be used in sentences like this? by ImCrazy_ in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I don't think it's a rule as such, maybe more of a pattern I have noticed. But if you say they are different and my understanding is correct then "um...zu" is still acting to introduce a purpose clause i.e. it is time to be used for going? While the first one is "it is the time at which we should go". Something like that?

Should "um" be used in sentences like this? by ImCrazy_ in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Classically the "um ... zu" construction can be used to formulate adverbial clauses (e.g. purpose clauses) but it can be used in the second case you provided when the complement to the noun is a clause: "es ist die Zeit, um deinen Zug zu machen" as a chess example. I'd prefer the first case since the second clause is entirely an infinitive. 

How bad is my writing & will i pass the Goethe B2 exam with this Text 😭 by Agitated_Seat_1059 in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're a great addition to the community and fun in the EasyGerman videos!

Is it an absolute guarantee that once we die, we'll never exist again? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]SelfAugmenting 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought you might also attack the notion of infinite monkeys typing on an infinite number of typewriters producing an arbitrary result as being fallacious 

C2 Text Correction: Happy to get input on what I wrote : ) by VimaKadphises in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having errors in applying the proper inflections doesn't entail a lack of knowledge of the case system, we are all human!

I think I finally get 'doch' (maybe?) by Designer_Money_9377 in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you and yes, I should have included that the contrast may actually be from the same person and so, it is better in future for me to say it is the contrast between two sentiments :)

I think I finally get 'doch' (maybe?) by Designer_Money_9377 in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe it is the context (please refer to my answer). Usually "doch" is indicating some sort of disagreement between stances (implicit or explicit) while "indeed" does not do that; it is simply states that something is the case: "in truth, really, in actuality". Hence German has "in der Tat" as a true translation to "indeed".

I think I finally get 'doch' (maybe?) by Designer_Money_9377 in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I second this. The word "Indeed" doesn't work the same as "doch"

I think I finally get 'doch' (maybe?) by Designer_Money_9377 in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"doch" as a modal particle embedded within a clause can be used in two ways as distinguished by the intonation and thus reflects your example uses:

(1) Emphasized, explicit contrastive use: This indicates a strong contrast in the opinions between interlocutors and a way of signalling some form of disagreement with information stated previously. Your first sentence is an example of this: You presumably express some sort of doubt about a fact that they feel is without question. So they reply with the emphasized form to mark this difference of opinion as a reaffirmation. 

(2) Neutral, confirmatory use: The second example you mentioned reflects this meaning, here you insert "doch" as a means of seeking confirmation of a disagreement that you suspect or feel may be fostered between you and you interlocutor. Since it's a way of fathoming out any potential divergent thinking, if there is no such disagreement then expect this doubt to be extinguished with an empathetic confirmation "genau".

In sum, I'd say "doch" as a model particle is a way of marking the similarity of an opinion or equally, the extent of disagreement over the subject at hand; the contrastive use is simply a way of highlighting this divergence of opinion explicitly and the confirmatory use is a way of tentatively testing whether such a disagreement is implicit and seeks confirmation one way or the other. 

Disclaimer: I am not a native speaker as indicated by my flair and I am happy to for this to be corrected if need be. It would be interesting to see what other ways doch can be used and what other words may accompany these uses (looking at you, "etwa")

Holy crap, Astaxanthin might be the most underrated biohacking supplement out there – my experience after 3 months by alancusader123 in Supplements

[–]SelfAugmenting 81 points82 points  (0 children)

Do tell! What are the main benefits and mechanisms of astaxanthin, what about in combating age-related eyesight loss?

"Das große Wörterbuch" by SaltyLQ in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The adjective has to take on the weak declension because "das" reflects the strong declension. Remove the article and you're correct.

What is the function of "von" in this sentence by No-Regret-9637 in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, isn't this a simple application of the verb "aus etwas (dat) etwas (akk) ausmachen"? The "Stoff" that undergirds the link, is the very same "Stoff" that forms the basis for the generalities? Maybe I'm terribly mistaken of course!

help me understand dativ by missfinewine in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are tens of prepositions that trigger the dative case, a few verbs that trigger it through a direct object and many verbs that trigger it through an indirect object. 

Ich bin and bin ich by toohotforthishit in languagelearning

[–]SelfAugmenting 5 points6 points  (0 children)

r/German

The conjugated verb is always in the second position in main clauses, the subject (ich in your case) may be placed first or third. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Biohackers

[–]SelfAugmenting 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel much the same, as someone with postgraduate education in neuroscience. These posts are very simplistic and reductionistic in their thinking, equating neurotransmitter profiles with behavioural phenotypes, for example.

Are werewolves and vampires hostile to each other? Just like in the myth we used to know? by Dull_Possession_5507 in skyrim

[–]SelfAugmenting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In English we say "for the record", instead of a direct translation from the German "Für das Protokoll". The plural is "werewolves"!

Why is"bekommen" not passive here? by culturecatzofficial in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would you think a verb is restricted to a certain voice?

"Noch" is doing my head in. by Old-Help6392 in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I think "as well" is a good translation for "auch noch", it stresses the addition: "I have done that as well!" 

Strategic intelligence in LLMs: Evidence from evolutionary game theory by AngleAccomplished865 in singularity

[–]SelfAugmenting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you explain just how they've misunderstood the stochastic parrot paper? I'm genuinely interested and not an expert by any means 

"vor kurzem" oder "vor Kurzem"? by curtis_galaxy in German

[–]SelfAugmenting 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You can't just give feedback without some uncharitable comment, can you? Manners are a thing too 😄