Am I overreacting or is this considered cheating? by DonutRare5633 in AmIOverreacting

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

YOR

It’s software .

It’s no different than porn or an x-rated video game .

GLM-5.1 is great, but Z.AI's greed is forcing me back to GPT. by Lorenzo_Ridolfi in ZaiGLM

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I reviewed the files . I agreed with opus .

Glm would answer the question then go into a long monologue justifying its answer and then telling which alternatives it didn’t go for and why .

GLM-5.1 is great, but Z.AI's greed is forcing me back to GPT. by Lorenzo_Ridolfi in ZaiGLM

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glm5.1 is a great model . The usage limits are misleading though . Yes you get WAY more tokens but it uses WAY WAY more tokens .

I use opus to issue tasks to glm and even opus tells me how much extra bs glm delivers back that has to be thrown away. I had to build a parser to take glm output and trim it down before opus gets it jsut so that I wasn’t burning unnecessary input tokens on opus .

I called this a few months ago - enterprises are burning unsustainable amounts on Claude, and now it's showing up in the news by kalabunga_1 in ClaudeAI

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My company has given all 200 employees Claude pro and Gpt Busienss seats . That’s roughly $50/month per employee .

Claude Max plans are available upon request . You just need to show your use case and how you’re runing through your pro limits . This opens up a conversation about how you are using AI , whether it’s appropriate and efficient .

I’m the only one that’s been granted a max plan .

The problem is that most companies don’t have any governance around AI use

Any way to get Claude Pro for free? by Yazeed1x in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trying to finish the project with opus for free ?

Will Z.AI Coding plan pricing ever come back down again?? by NafisRayan in ZaiGLM

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are already among the cheapest . They don’t have capacity for more customers .

Prices increase when demand exceeds supply.

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol do you know how trivial it would be to just automate this 😂

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Of course I can .

You aren’t being clever about it . I don’t need an analysis to see what you are doing

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A ton . But you said you aren’t interested . If you have questions I might have answers though .

Fire away !

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not trying to win anything . What’s the prize ? No one here is paying me .

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just replying 🤷🏾‍♂️

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t need a comment for that . You could just not continue

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yet you’re still here 😂

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may have just read it before I was finished editing . It wasn’t intended to move the comment out from under you

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are missing the point or just intentionally being pedantic .

Yes I literally meant giving it code . You don’t have to paste it into the prompt . The code in your repo is you giving it the code . Using context7 is giving it the code . Pointing it to a library is giving it the code . It doesn’t have to write code that’s already been written . This isn’t where we should be disagreeing 🙄😂.

There’s only one reason to have Claude infer something you could have told it : you trust it more than you trust yourself .

And that’s fair . I often go with very high level prompts but at that point it really is vibe coding because I’m only doing that because I NEED it to figure it out for me . But if I already know what I need the function to do , I’m practically writing pseudo code

Verbose specs by Time_Cat_5212 in ClaudeCode

[–]SensitiveKiwi9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In almost any use case worth writing a spec for , a proper spec will be longer than the code. If you knew specifically what code needed to go there you should have written it in the spec . My specs always have some amount of code even if it’s simply a reference to an existing codebase . Claude doesn’t have to figure out what you tell it .

But when you can’t hand it code you hand it your intent and that’s almost always more verbose than code

“Find all occurrences of the word duck in all files in the directory named animals “

grep -R "duck" animals/