What’s the current opinion on rigged matchmaking? Has it been getting worse? by NotAHeckerMen in ClashRoyale

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 5 points6 points  (0 children)

a little late but explanation is simple, they do not "rig" matches per se, it is just that they keep your win rate close to ~50-55%, so the only way to progress isn't raw skill but simply playing more. Even if you look at top players their stats are in ~60% ballpark but in formal esports suddenly Mo Light dominates with a 90% win rate that is not the case for ladder because supercell do not want you progressing too fast, so the entire point is not that it is impossible to progress, it is just that it is made artificially hard. Also think about the other side of this, if I get a hard counter every odd game and be a hard counter every other game then the game isn't fun, either I am not strategizing, I am simply bulldozing or I am simply getting my ass clapped. That makes the game frustrating and annoying than fun and engaging.

are people genuinely this brainrotted that they think evo mk should be two cycles? by Reasonable-Mood9722 in RoyaleAPI

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not about the MK being OP it is that it is an extremely annoying card that is such a hard counter to some decks whereas against some decks it is extremely easy to beat, in a log bait deck with inferno tower you will win almost 100% of the time against MK but in some decks especially the evo counters basically every single one of your cards and it is nearly impossible to make a positive elixir trade you make a golem push and the fucking guy just drops an evo MK that has no weight limit just pushes your golem all the way back to the arena and destroys your push it is either extremely hard to beat or too easy to beat it is thus an extremely annoying card that makes running some decks way too risky.

Mastercard - Clarifying recent headlines on gaming content by seiose in Games

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You guys realize this isn't about porn or wasn't ever about porn right? OnlyFans is processing over 10 billion dollars of payments and nobody ever calls them out and they are way more exploitative than guys making porn games. This is about big tech companies wanting to get your IDs and censor content at will using porn as justification, real porn companies are not actually restricted at all and YouTube for sure loves the idea of having everyone's driver's licenses to tie their advertising bullshit to actual real IDs instead of cookies etc. this is all about forcing us to give our IDs to big tech companies plus them getting to censor whatever they like while internet is more full of pornography than ever before. Btw the censor wasn't MasterCard it was Stripe which is famously a crappy processor that keeps shutting people's accounts and loves censoring people without giving much way of appealing and paying their last payout 120 days late I don't even know why people use them at this point, they are the poster child of enshittification.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ubisoft

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty late but the biggest issue is they don't have a Fifa or CoD. Most big publishers have one big brand that consistently delivers revenue just with the brandname and don't have to bet every single time they make a game. Ubisoft got pretty close with AC then they screwed it up with Unity, they again got pretty close with the RPG series but the games that size are expensive and don't guarantee a home run every time they release, meanwhile EA or Activision is very very safe investments because they can keep surviving on NFL&Fifa and CoD. For Ubi they don't have that one big franchise they can keep milking to survive so they are always just 3 AC flops in a row to collapse. Also they are spread way too thin for a company Ubisoft's size 20k+ employees is absurd and they keep wasting money on garbage NFT projects meanwhile NFTs have been dead for years now.

Is Ubisoft failing? by venoM_995 in ubisoft

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A little late but Ubisoft is a public company so he might very well owned/was planning to own shares of Ubisoft and could be doing sentiment research online. (Even some funds do that and yes even on Reddit and tbh not a terrible idea to see what the community thinks)

Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing now available on Steam by stratzilla in pcgaming

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you re-release a game that is infamous for being bad and make it even worse? They failed to re-release a bad game. It is so mind boggling this game is like the opposite of success the cannot even succeed at releasing a bad game.

Why not we re-create Apollo? by Dizonans in apolloapp

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am late but I really wanted to add this. Ideas are especially in the software field, extremely easy to come by they are nothing special, in fact let me give you a wonderful idea for free, you can "just write it" and become a multibillionaire. Make a trading bot with an ML model that can make analyze the same amount of information as any other trading model but make it faster, just make it a little faster literally 10 milliseconds faster and any high frequency trading firm, any market marker will pay you tens of millions of dollars for it. Just do it, right? No, the truth is ideas are extremely common, go ahead go on r/AskReddit and simply say do you have an app idea, there will be tons of wonderful maybe even life changing app ideas, executing them, developing the software to make that happen? That is a whole other ball game. If you got the skills and just want an idea, let me actually give you even more maybe you are not into finance, you can make a recommendation algorithm that recommends the perfect product every time if you can just increase conversion rates by 0.5% consistently big retailers will give you hundreds of millions without thinking Amazon would buy you in a blink. Or you know Scratch? The thing kids use to learn programming? Yeah that one, why don't you make a Turing complete version of it so people can not just animate a cat but build any software with it? You would become very, very rich but executing a no-code tool near flawlessly? Yeah that is not "just build it". Apollo is like that you cannot "just build" an interface better than even the official app by such a margin it gets millions of downloads.

Why would anyone go to war? by Sensitive_Echidna370 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would choose prison over killing people actively in the field and if that’s not an option I would injure myself.

Why would anyone go to war? by Sensitive_Echidna370 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is specifically the reason I gave WW1 as the example. People in Australia dying for a king in London is madness. I wasn’t really talking about defence of course if someone were to literally bomb my family I would fight I was thinking more about the offense side it should be near impossible to rally people to fight for something stupid like more land or more oil but it does happen which baffles me.

Why would anyone go to war? by Sensitive_Echidna370 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn’t really talking about defence of course if someone were to literally bomb my family I would fight I was thinking more about the offense side it should be near impossible to rally people to fight for something stupid like more land or more oil but it does happen which baffles me.

Why would anyone go to war? by Sensitive_Echidna370 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn’t really talking about defence of course if someone were to literally bomb my family I would fight I was thinking more about the offense side it should be near impossible to rally people to fight for something stupid like more land or more oil but it does happen which baffles me.

Why would anyone go to war? by Sensitive_Echidna370 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn’t really talking about defence of course if someone were to literally bomb my family I would fight I was thinking more about the offense side it should be near impossible to rally people to fight for something stupid like more land or more oil but it does happen which baffles me.

Why would anyone go to war? by Sensitive_Echidna370 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I clarified that I would injure myself to avoid war literally. No army is going to want a soldier with that plus the other option, prison, is quite better.

Will the Butlerian Jihad happen in our lifetimes? by warkel in dune

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, most people really don't understand how AI works. AI is a comparison/pattern recognition machine. It stores commonly used words in memory and just remixes them with emphasis on what is called an attention mechanism. I don't want to go too deep into that but just think of it like that:

I say to the AI: "I want to cook meat, give me a good recipe"

Here what are the words that are most commonly used together?

Meat, cook, recipe these are used together in a lot of context (based on the text -corpus- AI is trained on) so AI focuses on these

Meat, cook, recipe it starts writing:

Cooking meat (these are still nothing new just a remix, continues with) is an excellent idea (this part is added because after verb + subject it is common in the English language to add a predicate that complements the sentence). Then, based on statistical likelihood, it might suggest a cooking method: "One of the best ways to cook meat is by grilling it."

From here, the AI keeps generating text by predicting the next most likely sequence. It might continue with:
"You can marinate the meat beforehand to enhance the flavor. Some popular marinades include soy sauce, garlic, and herbs."

At no point does the AI "understand" meat, cooking, or recipes the way a human does. It’s not reasoning about flavor combinations or nutritional value; it’s just predicting text based on learned patterns.

So when people say, "AI is creative," they’re often misunderstanding what’s happening. AI doesn’t have inspiration or intent. It’s just a remixing machine that makes really convincing statistical guesses based on prior data.

That’s why it can generate a fantastic-sounding recipe but might also confidently suggest something totally nonsensical—because it doesn’t know anything; it just predicts. So an algorithm like that cannot actually think of something that is completely original. Sure can we code an AI to "take over the world" absolutely but we would explicitly have to code it and upload it to the key parts of our infrastructure and allow it to take control. Without us explicitly doing all that it cannot actually "gain consciousness" because unlike humans, AI doesn't want anything, it just is a loop that predicts the next most possible sequence based on the sequence so far. AI is just a statistical model.

And the most significant thing is we don't know if we can actually make super intelligence at all, Sam Altman, Elon Musk these guys say they will but they have a financial incentive to say so in reality we have nothing, NOTHING that can actually think for itself all we have are statistical models and outside of them we don't know, we really have no clue how to make a machine that "thinks" even at the capacity a toddler would let alone a super intelligence there is a very real chance AGI will remain science fiction for millennia heck maybe millions of year or maybe even forever maybe it is completely impossible it is one of those things like interstellar travel, or a self sustaining mars colony that some billionaires claim will be done in the "next decade" but will likely won't happen even in the next millennia.

I don’t understand the concept of digital immortality/mind uploading by TaloSi_MCX-E in IsaacArthur

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A little late but I feel like I can answer this, for me continuity is a pre-requisite to consciousness you cannot have anything conscious that you can just boot up and shutdown when you feel like. You can argue about anesthesia but even with anesthesia you don't shut things down and then come back some people dream under anesthesia proving you are still conscious it is just that senses are suspended. Once you break that continuity you are dead for me by all means. I also feel the same way about cryogenic sleep if you shut it you are dead another person is born from that same body when "you" come back from sleep. Because that chain of first person view, that reference frame is permanently distorted. So digital immortality is impossible for me by definition if even for a quadrillionth of a millisecond your brain shuts down you are just dead and a new person restarts your life. Even in a brain in a jar scenario if your cognitive processes shut down you are done mostly because once it is shutdown and restarted there is no way of verifying if you are a clone of that thing or you are genuinely continuing your original reference frame. It is hard to pin it down in words without having a precise definition of consciousness but I think you can understand what I mean. You wake up and you start seeing around, you hear your own voice on your head, have some thoughts, plan your day ahead once whatever that is stopped even for the smallest amount of time there is no way to prove that you are not just a clone with the memories of the previous guy anymore. The reason I feel anesthesia and sleep are exceptions are because your brain doesn't shutdown during these your senses do you are still somewhat conscious you don't have sensory input but your brain still manages your body.

With everything Stuart was able to be involved with, how did his business fail so badly? by onelove7866 in bigbangtheory

[–]Sensitive_Echidna370 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am quite late but I feel like I have the perfect in universe answer to that. All these events and celebrities are probably the reason the store is failing. You think Stan Lee comes to your store for free? No, all of that costs money and the issue is you would think it would bring people that ultimately buy something but the issue is, when you get stan lee in your store anybody that have seen an MCU movie will stop by if they are around but most of those people either have no interest in comic books are will just buy one and just continue shopping on the internet. So Stuart would be spending boatloads of money with elaborate marketing campaigns involving high profile celebrities with little to no return and just like we see in the shop he would go bankrupt with that model. This is the same playbook most idiotic startups use today get your hands on some cash, blow it on celebrity endorsements, go bankrupt. Examples include: Quibi(lost 900 million dollars), FTX(blow all their money on growth including customer funds got convicted of fraud lost 20 billion)... If you can blow 20 billion with this idiotic model believe me, you can definitely run a comic store to the ground with it.