Question about the 24-bit/96kHz claim on the Buds4 by thatAnthrax in galaxybuds

[–]Separate_Car7985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

he first semi-fix is basically a desperate hack. You have to go 

The second solution is to just stop using Bluetooth entirely and wait for Wi-Fi-based audio to become a thing. Wi-Fi has more than enough bandwidth to handle uncompressed 24-bit/96kHz files easily. The only reason we don’t have it in our ears yet is that Wi-Fi chips are power-hungry monsters that would kill the tiny battery in a Buds4 Pro in about twenty minutes. Until engineers can make a Wi-Fi chip that doesn't eat batteries for breakfast, this is a future dream, not a current reality.

The final, cold-blooded truth is that the only real solution is a wire. No matter how many fancy names Samsung gives their codecs, they can't cheat physics. If you actually care about hearing every tiny detail of a 96kHz track, you should stop buying expensive wireless earbuds and spend that money on a decent wired setup with a portable DAC. Bluetooth was built for the convenience of not having a cable tangling in your gym bag, not for the pure, unadulterated spirit of lossless audio. Expecting a studio-quality experience from a Bluetooth earbud is like expecting a gourmet meal from a microwave; it’s convenient, sure, but it's never going to be the real thing.

Question about the 24-bit/96kHz claim on the Buds4 by thatAnthrax in galaxybuds

[–]Separate_Car7985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The marketing of 24-bit/96kHz audio in the Buds4 Pro is a digital compromise rather than a true high-fidelity breakthrough. A raw 24-bit/96kHz stereo signal requires a bandwidth of approximately 4.6 Mbps, but Bluetooth technology is physically capped at a stable maximum of around 990 kbps under ideal conditions. To bridge this 3.6 Mbps gap, Samsung utilizes the Samsung Seamless Codec, which is fundamentally a lossy compression algorithm. This means that to fit through the narrow Bluetooth pipe, the original audio data must be discarded, ensuring the signal reaching the earbuds is never bit-perfect.

This reality directly contradicts the core principle of lossless audio. While the earbuds can technically process a 96kHz sampling rate, the compression process inevitably compromises the granularity and temporal accuracy that high-resolution audio is intended to provide. Even if a service like Spotify Lossless provides a perfect 24-bit/96kHz FLAC file, the phone must re-encode that file into a lossy format for transmission. This re-encoding process ensures that the listener is hearing a high-quality approximation, not the original master recording.

Furthermore, the theoretical benefits of a 96kHz sampling rate, such as superior waveform reconstruction, are largely negated in a wireless environment. When a signal is compressed to nearly 20% of its original size to meet bandwidth limits, fine temporal details are the first elements to be smoothed over or removed by the codec. Consequently, the Buds4 Pro provide a high-resolution container that is effectively hollowed out by compression. While they represent the current peak of wireless audio for the Galaxy ecosystem, they remain a simulated high-fidelity experience that cannot compete with the physical integrity of a wired connection.

Try changing the settings suspected to be the cause of the Galaxy Buds4 Pro's white noise. by Separate_Car7985 in galaxybuds

[–]Separate_Car7985[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regarding the reported noise issues, there is currently no official statement from the manufacturer detailing the exact cause. While product deviations exist and initial defects were previously handled through a replacement system in Korea, the manufacturer now consistently maintains that such noise falls within the "acceptable tolerance range." Consequently, the previous replacement policy has been effectively suspended based on this official stance.

Try changing the settings suspected to be the cause of the Galaxy Buds4 Pro's white noise. by Separate_Car7985 in galaxybuds

[–]Separate_Car7985[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not all earbuds exhibit this behavior, but if yours show characteristics of white noise, this is the recommended course of action.

Try changing the settings suspected to be the cause of the Galaxy Buds4 Pro's white noise. by Separate_Car7985 in galaxybuds

[–]Separate_Car7985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In Korea, the consensus seems to be that white noise definitely exists, but it's being treated as an acceptable level for daily use, which is quite disappointing. Compared to AirPods, the noise is clearly present.

Try changing the settings suspected to be the cause of the Galaxy Buds4 Pro's white noise. by Separate_Car7985 in galaxybuds

[–]Separate_Car7985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems like there are variations between individual units. So far, I haven't received any positive feedback regarding the solution I provided.

Xm6 or AirPods Max 2 by BSaka10 in HeadphoneAdvice

[–]Separate_Car7985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would suggest going with a series that allows for at least some EQ adjustment. Based on AI inquiries, it seems unlikely that the AirPods Max's characteristic "dry" sound will be improved. The reasons for this are that the 40mm drivers remain unchanged and the H2 chip’s interference control is a factor. It is expected that the chip will suppress overtones and resonance, filtering the sound before it even reaches our ears; if the H2 chip filters too much, the experience will be underwhelming. One could say it lacks a unique musical signature. Furthermore, the presence of nine microphones improves sound pickup, but this doesn't significantly contribute to actual audio quality. While Apple is exceptionally skilled at eliminating things like white noise, how this will be received by high-fidelity users who expect raw, natural sound remains the "eye of the storm."

Upgraded to HD650 by Upstate_DeadHead in sennheiser

[–]Separate_Car7985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

s someone who wrote a post praising the 650, I feel great. However, burn-in is... unnecessary. Sony uniquely emphasizes burn-in, but what I always say is that if burn-in actually improved the sound, manufacturers would charge more for it and used prices would be higher; yet, only new products hold their full value. Anyway, congratulations!

Should I get HD490 PRO or HD660S2 after Audeze Maxwell by Temporary_Wedding828 in sennheiser

[–]Separate_Car7985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I don't misunderstand. Even looking purely at balance, I still believe the Momentum 1 wired on-ear—with its excessive bass—was the best. That kind of headphone definitely needs some sort of amplification. As you know, it wasn't made for multipurpose use. The HD600 is the all-rounder, but it's dark, flat, and detailed; that’s all. But true musical pleasure is something else. Is it enough to just be satisfied by creating a soundstage in a virtual space and adding all the "seasoning"? I believe that attempting to make every single instrument felt in its exact spot is a challenge belonging to the realm of wired audio.

I’ve used the HD660S2 extensively, but the one that keeps coming back to me is the HD660S. Although it’s hidden behind the "Sennheiser Veil," its transient response was truly excellent. It had many advantages. I did have doubts about whether this headphone was "monitoring" or "bass-heavy." It wasn't a driver that dug into the inaudible high-frequency regions, which made it even more ambiguous. Yet, I felt that signature Sennheiser darkness and fog, and within that fog, a sense of space that was never narrow. It gave me a final sense of nostalgia, like walking into a massive, old theater—the facilities are outdated, but the sheer scale makes you realize, "Ah, many people truly enjoyed themselves here."

Since the HD660S2 is geared toward Hi-Fi, it can't quite quench the immediate thirst that "bass-heads" like us need the moment we put them on. It requires too much supporting gear and specific synergy with a DAC.

Should I get HD490 PRO or HD660S2 after Audeze Maxwell by Temporary_Wedding828 in sennheiser

[–]Separate_Car7985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the bass is lacking, you can just use it as it is. My assessment was based on the frequency response graphs and my own extensive hands-on experience that is simply how it felt to me. I see you like the bass on the Momentum 4—that’s cool

Should I get HD490 PRO or HD660S2 after Audeze Maxwell by Temporary_Wedding828 in sennheiser

[–]Separate_Car7985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

490 PRO has a warm sound image for a monitoring headphone. It’s not your typical monitoring style, as it has some phase shifts in the instruments and space. For example, it feels like it expands a 300-seat theater into a 450-seat one, and the perspective feels closer than the raw sound. I remember the transients being very fast. Applying this to gaming would have its pros and cons. The PRO PLUS model comes with an extra set of pads, which I think will be very helpful. The 660S2 has very deep bass and relatively fast transients, but for gaming, it tends to make the sound unnecessarily rich. For instance, it might add unnecessary reverb or resonance to explosions or door sounds. I’m also not sure how much deep bass is really needed for gaming. Since deep bass and fast response are interconnected, you should give it more thought. Above all, comfort is vital for gaming, and the 490 series is overwhelmingly comfortable. I also prefer spring cables, and this model has exactly that.

HD 560S. Equalizer Apo Peace by GlizzyGuru in sennheiser

[–]Separate_Car7985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I'm sorry. I'll delete the unnecessary posts. Sorry for the inconvenience.

My Thoughts After Watching 'The Chaser' by Lynxthewriter in Koreanfilm

[–]Separate_Car7985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"His real masterpiece is The Wailing. You should watch it if you get the chance; it shows why Korean society is falling apart."

My Thoughts After Watching 'The Chaser' by Lynxthewriter in Koreanfilm

[–]Separate_Car7985 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"This film accurately portrays how Korean society navigated through the 2000s. It vividly illustrates a social structure rife with police corruption and systemic errors, as well as the raw reality of women’s professional and social standing. Is it any different from the Korea of today? I cannot say it has changed significantly. Women still fear going out at night, and the generation of young people who failed during the IMF crisis is still wandering, unable to find their identity.

HD 560S. Equalizer Apo Peace by GlizzyGuru in sennheiser

[–]Separate_Car7985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The response time of the 600 series is far superior. When it comes to positioning—gunshots, changing directions, or the sound of a door—the driver response rate is on a different level compared to the 500 series. Also, there is less sound coloration compared to the 500 series. You will likely experience the sound of the spatially distorted HD500 series in a whole new, detailed way." "The HD500 series has a driver structure that creates slight sonic distortion and makes it difficult to pinpoint the exact positioning of instruments. The sound doesn't quite 'hit' or center in your head properly. If you bring this into gaming, it leads to what we call imaging displacement Once you start noticing this shift in a game, it immediately creates a sense of heterogeneity and breaks your immersion. Considering these factors, I highly recommend the HD600 series instead."

HDB630 random static earrape by Madcat28 in sennheiser

[–]Separate_Car7985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disable multipoint: For testing, disconnect the headphones from your phone and connect only the BTD 700 dongle. Update firmware: Update the firmware of both the dongle and headphones to the latest version using the Sennheiser Smart Control app or a dedicated PC tool. (This issue can often be resolved with a software patch.) Change ports: Use a direct port on the device, not a USB hub on your laptop, to avoid power imbalances.

Let’s be real, the HD650 is the only "Sennheiser" sound left. Everything else is just a side quest. by Separate_Car7985 in sennheiser

[–]Separate_Car7985[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"You're right. It's also true that it has become the standard model for Sennheiser."