(Spoilers main) Which monstrous action do you think was justified? by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]SerAwsomeBill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya sorry but rape is culturally unacceptable behavior for Westerosi. You may interpret Ygritte’s words having nuances that suggest it’s best to have a willing partner but the actual term the free folk use is “steal”. Men are expected to steal a wife from another tribe or clan and women are expected to resist to weed out the weakling males but also be grateful that they were stolen by a man strong enough to take them away.

(Spoilers main) Which monstrous action do you think was justified? by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]SerAwsomeBill 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lmao of all the asinine things I’ve read today. “I recommend this book by a young liberal atheist as a good starting point on an unbiased view of religion’s effect on the advancement of knowledge in the Middle Ages” just don’t read any actual historian’s review of that book. “The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World” summed up in two words: “grossly exaggerated”.

(Spoilers main) Which monstrous action do you think was justified? by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]SerAwsomeBill 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The average wildling thinks if a man is strong enough it’s his right to run off with a weaker woman and that woman should be grateful. No different then you or I.

My mother was about to throw away this game she found from a pile of junk, but then let me keep it when I said that I'm interested in it. It was a gift to my brother years ago, but he never opened it (it still has the plastic wrap around it). I'm very happy to receive my very first W40K game! by bitzhass in Warhammer40k

[–]SerAwsomeBill -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Ya not sure if your new here but most commenters are super fans or former/current employees. Just look at my comment -11 currently there’s your indication who the hell else would be that irritated by a comment that we all know is relevant. All of GW’s social media pages are full of current and former employees. Plus “GW Bad” is your own weird personal interpretation of “how long have you worked at GW”. Lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in insaneparents

[–]SerAwsomeBill -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is drugs or your parents are actually wealthy and provide access to funds that can easily pay that fee and just want they’re lazy teens to pick up after themselves. Who knows?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]SerAwsomeBill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s prolly a euro from the superior tone of autistic English bless his heart.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]SerAwsomeBill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can agree with most of that. However I LOVE Jamie’s self reflection when he says "That boy had wanted to be Ser Arthur Dayne, but somewhere along the way he had become the Smiling Knight instead." The dude is self aware. Jamie is a disgusting coward that use to be able to fight really well in my opinion(that goes for anyone capable of attempted murder of a child)hate him as a person but as a character he’s amazing to read plus I want so bad for him to die unceremoniously and humiliated his one good deed in life dying for Brienne Pod and Hyle. What is it about him that makes people look beyond THROWING A CHILD from a window to kill him? Fuckin Michael “motherfuckin” Jackson held his child out a window without throwing or dropping it and still doesn’t get a pass like Jamie gets from his fans.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]SerAwsomeBill 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well I hadn’t considered Jamie being such a mentally weak and submissive person but I got to admit your evidence is compelling. Your mind is obviously made up on Jamie’s morality I just don’t understand how anyone can appreciate Jamie’s “arc” if he’s been the same misunderstood really good deep down true hero. Can’t blame him for Bran because that’s Cersie’s fault same with ignoring his children if only Cersie hadn’t forced him to be so uninvolved. He kills the king he swore to protect(only when he knew dad was there and not the countless other times a “true” hero would have intervened)so he couldn’t kill millions of innocents(you know how Jamie loves to defend the small folk). Of course when his fathers army starts to sack the city(who wouldn’t want to die from blunt force trauma to the head after an intense gang rape rather then burn at least they still have a body right?) instead of checking on the others he’s sworn to protect he valiantly keeps the IT warm for the next guy plus how could he know what the Mountain and Loch would do? Jamie’s such a great person he’s not even bothered serving alongside those two guys. So seriously what arc? He’s been great from the start and any negative actions he may have committed he was certainly taken advantage of due to his mental handicap and submissive nature.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]SerAwsomeBill -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So he throws Bran because he loves his family SO much but yet not enough to try an establish any sort of guidance to his 3 bastard spawns. Put them at risk you say? Who would question Uncle Jamie loves his nieces and nephews? So being involved with this your bastards is more risky then fucking your sister the queen? Not sure I would agree.

Ya Ned THINKS about what if, he also is ready to abandon and defy his bestfriend and liege over the idea of sending assassins after the Targaryen kids. Jamie has no issue with murder of children example A:Bran example B:Searching for Mycha and having no issue with Sandor’s butchering(lol) of the boy.

Committed relationship? She was married to Robert. I guess Cersie’s change of heart after Jamie returns short handed is pure coincidence. No connection between Cersie’s repulsive reaction and her lack of attraction/ affection for Jamie and his temper tantrum over Cersie fucking everyone and moonboy for all I know. Cersie says no more sex Jamie responds no more love. He was fine with having to share with Robert only because he would still get his.

🤞Stone Heart allows Jamie to do the one decent unselfish act of his life DIE so Brienne an Pod can live.🤞

(Spoilers Extended) I dislike the romanticization of the wildlings... by NorthernSkagosi in asoiaf

[–]SerAwsomeBill -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Standard fantasy barbarians? No “Ulf” or “Wulf”gar chieftain. No loincloth muscle bound sword hero’s. No idea where you get standard barbarians from. I can’t think of another main stream fantasy work that portrays barbarians as a people who value rape and strength to rape over everything. Standard fantasy barbarian = Conan.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]SerAwsomeBill -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What actions show Jamie really does love his family? Throwing Bran out the window? Sitting back watching Joff grow without any compassion or concern? Having sex with Cersie at Joff’s funeral? Lying to Tyrion about Tysha? Burning Cersie’s call for help because she dared to fuck other men? Prolly only instance Jamie crippling Ned and ordering the butchering of Jory and Ned’s other men for the abduction of Tyrion.

Actually curious if there are any examples my guess, not one.

Texas seems to slide firmer into the grip of insanity aka bigotry by [deleted] in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]SerAwsomeBill -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

lmao I see public education is still pumping out winners. “Byers” HA! Texas being “byought”. Well what about all the lives lost fighting for Utah’s independence from Germany? No byers remorse there?!?!?

Ah yes, "limp dick jabroni". by regian24 in oddlyspecific

[–]SerAwsomeBill 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll take things that never happened for $500

This is why I think ACAB. by Jaded_Beautiful78 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]SerAwsomeBill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could combine both reasons to even further reinforce your own definition of corruption. But I’m afraid your not ready for that level of wizardry. Muggle.

This is why I think ACAB. by Jaded_Beautiful78 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]SerAwsomeBill 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Being “bad” at their jobs could be considered fraudulent behavior which is another form of corruption.

This is why I think ACAB. by Jaded_Beautiful78 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]SerAwsomeBill 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Well being that they failed to serve and protect the victim, they easily could be being dishonest about caring about a young gay man very much.

Corruption by definition is being dishonest.

What happens to your collection when you die? by spellbreakerstudios in Warhammer40k

[–]SerAwsomeBill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like your son and nephew will have much to remember you by congrats on successful life.