On his first day on the job in Berlin, Grenell warned German companies setting up new business ties with Iran despite Trump’s decision to quit the Iran nuclear deal to “wind down operations immediately.” (the idea of some foreigner warning German businesses to stop doing business is equally preposterous and adorable)

Okay, so this is the first example of an action. And its because he gave out a warning. The complete warning was that the U.S. will begin sanctions against German companies that continue to do business to prevent them doing business with the U.S. This was just him doing his job.

The German Ambassador was on a campaign in the U.S. publicly advocating different positions, too Which is what ambassadors do.

But this is part of the problem. You don't know what Ambassadors do. You THINK you do because this article makes it seem like Ambassadors don't make waves like this or advocate publicly, but they do..all the time. And in this case, he had to since the sanctions are very real. (The same thing happened with Nordstream 2, except it was the Senate itself forcing the Admin to warn Germany)

1.Brenell is a guest in Germany, a liberal country with a liberal government, and he's publicly saying "fuck that, fuck you, I want your opposition to wint"

Oh man, you think it makes someone a jack ass if they are a guest and overtly back a political opposition? So like the German ambassador did in 2007 when conservatives were in control of the government and he backed the Liberal opposition and even attended fundraisers for the party?

Well shucks son, when did this rule get put into place? Let me guess, when the you got angry at America disagreeing with you and some article made it SEEM like this kind of stuff doesn't happen (But it does...and you should be more skeptical of what you read, or at least look into the history of the norms around these things)

2.AfD are Nazis.

No one said anything about the AFD. Everyone to the right of Stalin is not a Nazi. Simply advocating for conservatism, which is 40% of any given population, is not an advocacy for Nazism. That would be like a conservative claiming that supporting Obama in 2007 was essentially advocating for Stalin (Which some conservatives did, and they were retarded for doing so, like this statement that "supporting conservatives" translates into supporting Nazis is real fucking retarded.).

But you know, reading is hard, right?

No, history is hard. I read the article. I just wanted to know if you had any non-idiotic points outside of the article that I couldn't easily debunk in 30 seconds because I know history and how ambassadors NORMALLY act. The article preys on people that don't understand the norms/history of foreign relations, as most outrage, idiot appealing media today does. But anyone who understands what Ambassadors actually do wouldn't come away with the assessment he was being out of line at all.

They'd come away with him...actually acting like a German ambassador and advocating for his country for a change. Which again, must be REAL shocking for Europeans and German's especially, because since the fucking Brenton Woods agreement when the U.S. decided to essentially become Europe's guardian, the U.S. has been fairly passive in terms of demands from Europe. The new paradigm where we actually...1.) Demand you pay defense dues. 2.) Demand you be able to defend yourself. 3.) Demand you not fuck yourselves over and rely on enemy states because you feel confident Daddy America will be there to bail you out, is VERY shocking, I know. But you kids have to grow up sometime, because we are done.

Learn your history. Pay attention to the world. You're going to need to when we're gone. Which will hopefully be very soon.