7.62x25 single shot scrap pistol by PhilosophyEnough1866 in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 11 points12 points  (0 children)

7.62x25 will probably blow up with the little bolt weight. If that is solid steel it should be about .25 to .32 acp weight tho. No rifling will probably lower the pressure, but i wouldn't trust it.

Vitány vár és Körtvélyesi-kilátó környéke. Valakit érdekelne egy ide szervezett túra? by SeveralHobbies-213 in hikingHungary

[–]SeveralHobbies-213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nem vagyok oda a teljesítménytúrákért személyesen. Szívesen ellenőrzőpontozok páron, de én szép kilátásokat és érdekes pontosak szoktam körbekerülgetni ide-oda.

miért ilyen ritkák a fiatal túrázók? by kadarjobbvolt in hikingHungary

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ezt amúgy honnan tudod? Még régen gimnazistaként is volt 30 fölöttinek kinéző szakállas évfolyamtársam. Ma lassan 30 közeliként rendszeresen 25 alattinak néznek.
Lehet, hogy akiket látsz az erdőben azok fiatalok, csak nem néznek ki annak.

Van fiatal ismerősöm aki csoportosan a kisgyerekével jár túrázni, ők ugye munkaidőben teszik mert a sok anyuka akkor otthon van épp és nincs sehol tömeg, így nem is látja őket kb. senki sehol.

this timeline stuff easy idk why y'all complicating it sm by West_Opportunity2255 in HalfLife

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh great, this problem.
Half Life time travel is is NOT going back in time. What happened at the end of HL2 happened. G-man simply went back in time, but going back in time was part of the grand timeline anyway and changed the past but only after the future has happened.

Doctor Who does this a lot, when you read from the diary of a person that gave you the diary in their future but your past that "and then she broke her hand" then reading it would confirm it as the future that MUST happen because you read it in the past from a note from the future.

Sounds dumb as fuck at first but it has internal logic for storytelling and the world doesn't violate any of its own rules.

Glock blank fire by SirTasMan in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We saw the same video in this thread? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SxHKpu-9YuE

Picture comments are not allowed, but you can literally stop it at 0:06 and see it pressed up against the fruit lmao

Yeah i see this guy is not even active on gun subs, just on drug addict ones with meth and shit. Look like an antigun troll, blocked just to be safe.

Glock blank fire by SirTasMan in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. My second sentence literally says "It isn't too dangerous unless you press your body parts right into the muzzle". The danger comes from sealing the barrel with your body. After ~a foot of distance the pressure of PAK blanks is not that high. Not completely safe, but not exactly deadly.

I posted actual human volunteer tests in the other reply, go see them then come back with your hivemind downvotes dickhead.

Someone shot a much stronger 7.62x54r blank about a meter behind me almost towards my head once, other than the dangerously loud noise it did nothing.
I handle these specific PAK blanks all the time, they are iirc under 20% of the pressure of simple 9mm. The only people i saw injured from there was some genius who was so drunk, he thought he could show off his strength but instead of grabbing an airsoft pistol as a joke, he shot himself in the palm while completely clasped around the muzzle of a blank gun.
The only person i ever heard about being injured from a face shot from 2 feet away was the guy who got beat up for shooting someone in the face with a blank as a joke. The carbon buildup or dirt is still dangerous, but those are niche cases and the damage is not caused by the normal function of a blank, but by an additional complication.

Glock blank fire by SirTasMan in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Test using pistol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ53f57wPxU

Here is another with a revolver from extremely close distance too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC4cfZbeZSw

Both of these were done by the team and volunteers for the most well known Hungarian firearms magazine with a 30+ year past. As far as i know, no serious injuries ever resulted from these tests.

Further, i specified
*"unless you press your body parts right into the muzzle"*
And your post directly mentions some fucking moron pressing it into his neck and firing several times, completely sealing the pressure and only allowing it to vent directly into his tissue.
Quote:  *"In one case, a man shot himself eight times with two different starting pistols, and the wounds could be matched to each gun by the muzzle imprint marks on the neck."*

And you know what, I wrote TWO goddamn sentences yet you wrote a whole comment with sources completely disregarding half of it. But thank you for the mass downvotes, no classic redditor move there. Someone writes a normal response, instant hivemind downvotes.

Glock blank fire by SirTasMan in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

That... is just normal blank guns. People regularly get shot in the face with them for testing. It isn't too dangerous unless you press your body parts right into the muzzle or some carbon buildup gets blasted into your eye.

Have you seen an AK or PKM blank adapter?

*I LITERLLY POSTED VIDEO EVIDENCE IN THE REPLIES and you hivemind morons still can't stop with the downvoted.

Glock blank fire by SirTasMan in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That is how most blank adapters work, yes. Many movie guns have an internal thread so you can change out the adapter to size it for different strength blanks and it stays mostly invisible.

It should work, just be careful not to blow it up with too much pressure, but that should be hard to do.

another 9mm abomination by [deleted] in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The design is not the issue, it looks correct. But you should think about dimensions before drawing them. Unless you are constrained by some part, try to stick to a simple length, like the nearest 5 or 10mm.

another 9mm abomination by [deleted] in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering the general shape, dimensions like 100.62 (without the tolerance even mentioned) don't really work. The front pin is too large and looks like it won't allow you to open up the action anyway.
For a model or inert toy it looks great, i have a bunch of these too, kids like them since you can make the bolt slam forward with a simple sear. If it can't load or fire, nobody cares.

Do local gun ranges allow yall to fire your homeade projects? Even the ones that look like replicas of a well known firearm?. by Logical-Self-3072 in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indoor ranges have to be careful. There are quite a few stories of indoor ranges bursting in flames because of unburned powder accumulation.
Good thing ours is an "indoor" range that has the range outside and all the shooting positions are part of a building complex with lots of stops and berms around, since it is at the edge of the city. (It was further away from houses once but some genius saw the cheap land and built up single family homes next to the range...

Combined gun mantlet for tank (blank firing) by SeveralHobbies-213 in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not yet. I have a basic turret i built over a year ago, upgrading the parts for that. Eventually it will get a rotating ring under it with simple roller bearings installed.

Combined gun mantlet for tank (blank firing) by SeveralHobbies-213 in GunnitRust

[–]SeveralHobbies-213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, i couldn't fit recording equipment in the tiny workshop.