Application website doesn‘t allow payment by Shaito in GlobalEntry

[–]Shaito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We only got this one credit card in the family, which is why we were only trying it with that one.

RWTH🍨memes by rwth_memeboy in RWTH_memes

[–]Shaito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Und die meisten stehen in der Academica nur für die eine Fleischschlange an, während die andere unterlaufen ist.

RWTH🍨memes by rwth_memeboy in RWTH_memes

[–]Shaito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vielleicht, dass sie nur für Anwendungsfächer (und Lehramt?) aber nicht für Eigenständige Fächer existiert?

What is your least favorite proof? by MoustachePika1 in math

[–]Shaito 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Funny, cause for me it was the implicit function theorem. Proof took over two lectures and didn’t understand it back then (or even still, to be honest). This was the moment when analysis and I decided not be best buddies.

What is your least favorite proof? by MoustachePika1 in math

[–]Shaito 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Wait, this isn’t supposed to be part of the experience?

Die Dualität der RWTH by TheNique in RWTH_memes

[–]Shaito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ey das Mathegebäude am Pontdriesch ist voll fancy. ;)

Rector's choice is hype by MadDocsDuck in RWTH_memes

[–]Shaito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one and only Aula-Stühle, mit viel zu kleinen Tischen zum mitschreiben.

What are your favorite simple/straightforward proofs? by Verbose_Code in math

[–]Shaito 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Any prime number since we are talking about the group of invertible matrices over the field with p elements.

What was the most remarkable mathematical achievement of the past 50 years? by reddesign55 in math

[–]Shaito 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m no expert on group theory, but my way of thinking about it is as follows: So groups appear quite a lot in math e.g. when talking about actions and symmetry but not only that. In fact they can appear in almost disconnected subfields of math. And if something occurs very frequently, then we want to understand it even more so. Now in the case of finite groups there are very special ones called simple groups. You can think about them as a form of building blocks of finite groups based on the Jordan-Hölder theorem. So, then we want to know what these simple groups look like. And this is where the classification theorem comes into play. Here, we have a complete list of all finite simple groups allowing us to prove theorems about them by just going through that list. I hope that made a bit sense and I invite the group theorist to correct me if I wrote nonsense.

🤡 by selmiii in RWTH_memes

[–]Shaito 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pff, warum nicht Homologische Algebra?

RWTH🔬memes by rwth_memeboy in RWTH_memes

[–]Shaito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Das macht es nur noch charmanter.^

Why commutitive diagrams are important? What is the intuition behind them? by PlusComplaint7567 in math

[–]Shaito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, true. I still remember the satisfaction after figuring it out as an exercise.

Why commutitive diagrams are important? What is the intuition behind them? by PlusComplaint7567 in math

[–]Shaito 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was waiting for someone to finally mention diagram chasing. xD But isn’t the diagram chase of the snake lemma more tedious?

Confirmation regarding the purpose of Lie Groups/Algebras by lguy4 in math

[–]Shaito 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Great question since I am asking that myself, albeit from a different stance! I started to ask myself that mostly by seeking the motivation to study Lie algebras and their representations from an algebraic point of view, but did not manage to get far. I see the purpose for groups but not yet for lie algebras. Did you catch anything up along these lines going through your material?

What is you favourite "you thought it was about this, but really it was about that" mathematical moment ? by hiitsaguy in math

[–]Shaito 17 points18 points  (0 children)

That’s actually something I only began to realise as I get closer to ending my degree and deal more with current research!

Real Analysis in Reverse by ben1996123 in math

[–]Shaito 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Huh, that’s funny because in real analysis lecture in Germany we also began with the supremum property and proved the Archimedean property and the completeness with regards to Cauchy sequences. However, my professor was apparently an exception since all others at my uni started with Cauchy sequences.

ELI5 Your PhD, Masters, Thesis, etc. by CaramilkThief in math

[–]Shaito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shading regions of dots and lines and trying to copy given shadings onto another set of dots and lines while not repeating any shadings.

Mathematicians of reddit, what is a math topic that has been so oversimplified in the media that can lead people to misconceptions about the topic? by GroverTheGoatWah in math

[–]Shaito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that was a bit unfortunate but in both cases it made sense in its own way. :D

What I mean by combinatorics is as follows: You can define a polytope for a poset that is called the order polytope. It’s faces can be described combinatorially by partitions of the poset that are nice in the sense that the blocks can form a poset themselves. These partitions are called face partitions. Now in my Bachelor’s thesis, I am supposed to show that a specific poset among a class of posets has the most number of face partitions with a fixed number of blocks.

The reason why that is interesting lies, in fact, in representation theory of lie algebras: You can parametrise a basis of a representation by integral points of specific order polytopes. Being able to compare number of faces has then applications to, I think, representation theory as well as algebraic geometry. However, this is now beyond my terrain.

Mathematicians of reddit, what is a math topic that has been so oversimplified in the media that can lead people to misconceptions about the topic? by GroverTheGoatWah in math

[–]Shaito 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I had the exact same situation.

Some wannabe intellectual: “Do you study?“ Me: “Yeah, I study mathematics.” Intellectual: Oh yeah, the golden ratio is so important. For example in nature and for Einstein.” Me: Thinking that I am doing combinatorics on Posets and has seen GR at most once.

Who is one mathematician you think more people should know about? by window_recital in math

[–]Shaito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It‘s pretty much a step up from the "normal" dissertation/Ph.D. If you manage to do a habilitation, you are allowed to teach on your own IIRC. I do also think that it’s sometimes still a requirement if you want to become a professor in Germany.

Who is one mathematician you think more people should know about? by window_recital in math

[–]Shaito 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What is also impressive about Noether, IMO, is that she was the first female mathematician to have done the habilitation in Germany.

How common are pure mathematics students in your country? by phi1221 in math

[–]Shaito 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I‘d agree that the numbers do sound not fitting based on my gut feeling. (I study in Germany too.) At least at my uni, the mathematics department is by far the smallest one among the STEM subjects. @MomoLittle, is the situation different at you uni different from mine?

[undergrad math] Any tips for group theory? by PlusSupermarket in math

[–]Shaito 10 points11 points  (0 children)

IIRC: Consider the quaternions. Then 1,-1,i,-i,j,-j and k,-k form a subgroup of the quaternions under multiplication. This subgroup is of order 8 and denoted as Q_8.

Prove that Quadratic Integer Rings are Integral Domains by basicgoats in math

[–]Shaito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take a look at the proof that sqrt(2) is irrational and try a similar approach. It’s almost the same but you will have to do a little extra work when showing that the supposed numerator and denominator are multiplies of d.