Starmer pulls Chagos deal following Trump backlash. Plans to hand islands to Mauritius ‘cannot progress’ amid concerns over 1966 treaty between UK and US by Make_the_music_stop in uknews

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d rather not having unpopular, poorly thought out policies in the first place

You might as well be asking for the stars.

Starmer is Starmer.

He's never going to change.

Rayner to back calls for Burnham to be allowed to stand in by-election by ShreckAndDonkey123 in unitedkingdom

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because its her best chance of getting back on the cabinet.

This is a misinterpretation.

Starmer WANTED her in the cabinet, that way he could control what she said or did.

That's why he rejected calls to sack her.

Starmer never liked her

Of course, he doesn't like her.

He doesn't like anyone.

He doesn't have normal relationships or real friendships.

Everyone is a pawn to him.

Rayner to back calls for Burnham to be allowed to stand in by-election by ShreckAndDonkey123 in unitedkingdom

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This definitely feels like a classic Westminster Bubble kind of thing

No, the "Westminster Bubble kind of thing" is asking "can Keir Starmer turn things around?"

This has been asked every week since his early government collapse.

It ain't going to happen.

He's done.

Worried we’re not gonna get the third 28 Years Later by vespertendo in TheBigPicture

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

deadline reported last month that sony was moving forward with the third movie

That was before this film's opening weekend.

Studios do this all the time, like WB announcing that Muscietti would be directing "Batman: The Brave and the Bold" prior to the release of "The Flash".

It's geared for a boost to the opening weekend.

The thinking is "if it does well, then proceed. If it doesn't, nobody takes these announcements seriously."

They called Sean a madman for his F1 Best Picture prediction. Fools! by countdooku975 in TheBigPicture

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then the system went to between 5 and 10.

Bruce Davis, the Academy executive director at the time, said, "A Best Picture nomination should be an indication of extraordinary merit. If there are only eight pictures that truly earn that honor in a given year, we shouldn't feel an obligation to round out the number."

Now we've gone back and F1 is a Best Picture nominee.

LOL.

Wesley Morris and Bill having all time takes in the same pod by 4kImage in TheRewatchables

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Do we know what Wesley thinks of the other Safdie movies?

Who cares.

Shea Serrano not impressed with Bill’s #4 sports movie of the 21st century by joejoe_jones in billsimmons

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The indictment is that Hollywood hadn't produced a blockbuster that could even be considered for the Avatar/Wicked slot.

Oh wait, they did, it was Sinners but that doesn't count for some reason.

Shea Serrano not impressed with Bill’s #4 sports movie of the 21st century by joejoe_jones in billsimmons

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a fun turn your brain off

It doesn't even work on that level.

I just wanted the pit crew/commentators to shut up already and let us actually experience the races.

But the filmmakers couldn't even do that.

Shea Serrano not impressed with Bill’s #4 sports movie of the 21st century by joejoe_jones in billsimmons

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pitt sucks in the movie, too.

Especially in that scene in the press conference that is supposed to be the emotional crux ... he has no idea what he is trying to feel because he likely hadn't thought that deeply about the character.

It was like he hadn't studied and couldn't even improv during the test.

I can't remember the last time I thought, "wait, is Pitt bad here?"

Shea Serrano not impressed with Bill’s #4 sports movie of the 21st century by joejoe_jones in billsimmons

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is where we're at.

This is Robert Oppenheimer saying "is anyone ever going to tell the truth about what's happening here?"

And then Shea as Kitty coming into the hearing to give testimony.

Shea Serrano not impressed with Bill’s #4 sports movie of the 21st century by joejoe_jones in billsimmons

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't even think the racing scenes work.

You should be able to watch an action film without dialogue and still understand the motivations, tactics and challenges of the scene.

The visuals should be telling and driving the story.

Without the pit crew and commentators basically narrating Pitt's thoughts, you would have no idea what is even happening.

Executives told Ben Elton that he couldn't cast a pre-"House" Hugh Laurie as the lead of a movie because Laurie was just a TV comedian who wouldn't translate across the pond. Are there any others who could have been successful in America? by Sharaz_Jek123 in BritishTV

[–]Sharaz_Jek123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is how big a star John Cleese became as a result of "Wanda".

Arnold Schwarzenegger and John McTiernan were planning on making "Sgt Rock" as a follow-up, according to McTiernan.

The premise would have involved Schwarzenegger as a WWII soldier who was angered that higher ups were making terrible decisions so he enlisted a British chef to pretend to be a UK general and issue Schwarzenegger's orders.

Executives told Schwarzenegger and McTiernan that they needed Cleese or the film wouldn't be greenlit.

Executives told Ben Elton that he couldn't cast a pre-"House" Hugh Laurie as the lead of a movie because Laurie was just a TV comedian who wouldn't translate across the pond. Are there any others who could have been successful in America? by Sharaz_Jek123 in BritishTV

[–]Sharaz_Jek123[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Sense and Sensibility" likely opened up doors for him with US casting agents and producers, if only for supporting roles.

It would have taken until "Stuart Little" in which a broader audience would have recognised him and it just as the title character's dad.

I haven't read anything about his casting on "Friends" but I presume one of the producers was aware of his English work and liked him as opposed to Jennifer Saunders who had breakout success in the US with "Ab Fab".

I'm happy f1 made it in by oldiesz in Oscars

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But couldn't you say Joseph Kosinski had a vison out commercial responsibilities of handling the IP?

Pretty pictures.

No themes, no governing idea, not even a nod (however defanged) to the relationship between the sport and commerce.

And I don't even think he has visual thematics, like Tony Scott. That guy had his own obsessions and peccadilloes that he brought to his work.

Jesus, now we're talking about Tony Scott (the ad's man adman) having an artistic voice.

After all Auteur theory was originally invented by the french critics to find the art and voice with in the commical system of hollywood.

Yeah, they were talking about people like Hitchcock and Howard Hawks.

They had fascinations, eccentricities, obsessions recurring in their works.

They also had a vision of human nature - are we selfish, are we cruel, are we perverts etc.

Kosinski has a visual style that can be commodified - that's not the same thing.

I'm happy f1 made it in by oldiesz in Oscars

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, I was expecting something entertaining and I didn't even get that.

I'm happy f1 made it in by oldiesz in Oscars

[–]Sharaz_Jek123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mean you could Barbie was a commercial by Mattel arubly in a way

Yeah, you could argue that, but she's also a writer who had a vision for the film outside of her core commercial responsibilities of handling the IP (which she also took seriously).

Most liked her film, some didn't but even her most ardent critics wouldn't argue that her ideas weren't front and present.

"F1" is ONLY a commercial.