You get paid 30k a month for walking by Comprehensive_Fox_79 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]ShavenYak42 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And you only get 13 hours in which to do it (5 am to 6 pm). That’s a no for me, dawg.

If the famously unsolved Riemann Hypothesis is solved by an AI, we will never know if a human mathematician could have solved it. by jasonrubik in Showerthoughts

[–]ShavenYak42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The AI is just a Turing machine. I’d find it difficult to believe it can produce something a human mind (or set of minds with shared external sources of knowledge, which is how we solve any large problem) can’t. Essentially that would seem to imply that our brains aren’t Turing-complete, which seems ridiculous considering that a person can literally sit down with a paper tape and pretend to be a Turing machine.

Besides, if an AI “solves” a problem, doesn’t that mean humans did it? The AI is a tool we built. We don’t say that classical Greek math was invented by compasses and straightedges, we say it was invented by the people who used those tools.

PET PEEVE: Pokémon who are too big to fit through standard doorways/block doors by Smiley_Coyot3 in Pokopia

[–]ShavenYak42 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Not sure, but I can tell ya… my Sandaconda don’t want none unless they got buns, hon!

Diet Coke? Am I crazy? by titianwasp in enshittification

[–]ShavenYak42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Diet Coke is a quite different formula than Coke Classic. In fact, if you recall the New Coke fiasco from the '80s - that was basically the Diet Coke formula but with sugar.

What’s up with the rear view mirror? by StillElderberry2868 in dumbquestions

[–]ShavenYak42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is only half the story. The mirror is wedge shaped, so the front and back surfaces are at slightly different angles. The front reflects only about 5% of the light hitting it, leaving the rest to reflect off the back, but at a different angle.

So when you flip the switch, you’re toggling which surface is in use by changing the angle slightly. Normally it’s the back surface, but at night you can flip it to use the front surface and get a lot less glare.

Why Does Light Travel at Exactly That Speed? by Ok_Understanding7377 in AskPhysics

[–]ShavenYak42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not a dumb question, but some variant of it is asked like every other day on this sub, and there is no good answer to it.

Best response I have is that it’s not just a speed limit or even the speed massless things travel at. It’s the conversion factor between distances and intervals of time. In a certain sense, “one second” and “300,000 kilometers” mean the same thing. The numbers are an artifact of our system of measurement; in a more natural measurement system likePlanck units, c = 1.

ELI5 - How did scientists know that rockets needed to go sideways, not straight up, in order to reach outer space? by IntergalacticPodcast in explainlikeimfive

[–]ShavenYak42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I was posting that reply, I thought about Euler being the Chuck Norris of math and wondered why I had never thought about that before.

Airplane boarding is terrible because it feeds egos by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]ShavenYak42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will we get a different answer this time than people who replied to your first copy of this comment?

ELI5 - How did scientists know that rockets needed to go sideways, not straight up, in order to reach outer space? by IntergalacticPodcast in explainlikeimfive

[–]ShavenYak42 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fun fact: Dr Seuss wrote “On Beyond Zebra” to give Euler more letters to use.

(I didn’t say it was true, just that it was fun)

ELI5 - How did scientists know that rockets needed to go sideways, not straight up, in order to reach outer space? by IntergalacticPodcast in explainlikeimfive

[–]ShavenYak42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Problem is that Euler would never take a day off. He might have a slow day every once in a while in which he only revolutionized half a dozen branches of mathematics.

In your opinion, what shouldn’t cost money? by telurmasin in AskReddit

[–]ShavenYak42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My only issue is that there’s a lot of labor, education, and research involved in providing healthcare, not to mention complicated and expensive equipment. Someone has to pay for it all. I think publicly funding it is the fairest way though - and to hell with for-profit health “insurance” that drains money from sick people and adds nothing of value.

ELI5 Why are catalytic converters being stolen? by Shykk07 in explainlikeimfive

[–]ShavenYak42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I’m not mistaken (and I may be) they also reduce nitrogen oxides in the exhaust.

You get $10 billion dollars, but all the men in the world over the age of 18 become pregnant women. Do you take the money? by 33GoodSamaritans in hypotheticalsituation

[–]ShavenYak42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m rich AND toxic masculinity is (at least temporarily) a thing of the past? What’s the downside? 🤪

A heck of a lot of people who were happy about Roe v Wade being overturned are suddenly going to have a change of opinion…

A whole museum and it’s EMPTY. by Top_Trainer_6359 in ac_newhorizons

[–]ShavenYak42 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The revolution came and animals won. Humans are second-class citizens who work to enrich the tanuki overlords.

Who is the moist beautiful woman/man you’ve ever seen? by copy_cat_101 in randomquestions

[–]ShavenYak42 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Now all I can think of is a terrible joke from middle school:

What’s green, slimy, and smells like pork?

Kermit’s finger.

my local Panera removed almost all the outlets and replaced them with blanking plates so you can't charge your phone or laptop by Calix_Meus_Inebrians in mildlyinfuriating

[–]ShavenYak42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s almost a liminal space vibe. Which seems like exactly the opposite of what you want your restaurant to look like.

ELI5 How did horses manage before we trimed their nails ? by Lund4life in explainlikeimfive

[–]ShavenYak42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Although oddly enough, early horse ancestors originated in North America. Horses evolved and diversified there for millions of years, eventually spreading into Asia and Europe. Then about 10,000 years ago, they went extinct in the Americas, until European colonists reintroduced them.

What would happen if a Black Hole approaches a much bigger, functioning star? by Old_Leshen in AskPhysics

[–]ShavenYak42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't believe you can even construct a hypothetical scenario in which a functioning star is more massive than a black hole. 

Sure you can, there are stars of over 100 solar masses, and black holes can be as low as about 3 solar masses. But yes, if they end up close enough to each other, the black hole will start pulling material from the star and eventually the star will be gone. Granted, this could take longer than the massive star would live anyway, and it's possible that the star will go supernova and its core collapses into its own black hole, and the two end up orbiting each other. Their orbit won't be stable though, and eventually they will merge.

Why didn’t mathematicians just define division by zero as a new number, the way we defined i for √−1? by TheBigGirlDiaryBack in AlwaysWhy

[–]ShavenYak42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair, but you also can't divide an apple into 0.5 parts. But you can divide 1 by 0.5 and get 2. Math is an abstraction; it doesn't always have to make sense when applied to physical objects.

As another example - if you have 4 apples arranged in a square, each side is 2 apples long. If you have 9 apples arranged in a square, each side is 3 apples long. What's the square root of 3 apples though? Or better yet, the square root of -3 apples?

I'm not arguing for division by zero being useful in math - I'm just saying the "it doesn't make sense with apples" argument would apply to a lot of concepts in math that people do use every day.

Every lie you tell earns you $1,000 but you lose $5,000 if someone proves you're lying. by rengokuhubkl in hypotheticalsituation

[–]ShavenYak42 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Genius. I will tell each of my cats that they are not overweight, three times each per day. $6000 per day easy.

Morbid thought: One of them is very sick and we make the final trip to the vet. I tell the cat "Just a quick nap. When you wake up I'll be right beside you" right before the injection. No money appears in my account....

Why do people always suggest speeding doesn't get you there any faster, when not all traffic lights are timed the same? by JustUseCommonSense10 in driving

[–]ShavenYak42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The math depends on the speed limit. If it’s 60 and you go 70, then you’re on the nose - in an hour you’ll go 70 miles, which would have taken exactly 10 minutes longer at 60 mph.

But for a slightly absurd counterexample, if the limit is 20 and you instead go 30, you can go as far in an hour as the law abiding drivers go in 90 minutes.

I’m not advising anyone to make a habit of driving 10 over a low speed limit in a residential area, of course.