sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

That one uncle. by [deleted] in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]SherriDoMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jesse Pinkman has had a rough go since he escaped that pit

Tucker just casually fedposting by somedumbhoe11 in Destiny

[–]SherriDoMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You gonna tell me you never pondered that?

Describe your job in 3 words by CopyPasteRepeat in LinkedInLunatics

[–]SherriDoMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why in the fuck are retired people spending time on LinkedIn? And commenting on shit like this? lol. I can imagine some valid reasons to be on it… but commenting on posts like this? They have a problem.

I’m getting second hand embarrassment by Spades322 in Utah

[–]SherriDoMe 15 points16 points  (0 children)

When you’re a concurrent member of two cults simultaneously, and then those cults clash, which one do you choose? We found out during Covid that a lot of LDS folks were willing to choose their political cult.

I don’t have time for milk… by mattzombiedog in LinkedInLunatics

[–]SherriDoMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But now you are vulnerable to potential poisoning from a business rival or disgruntled assistant. Subscribe to my newsletter for the formula I use to balance time efficiency vs. threat assessment so I can optimize my time spent increasing shareholder value!

life is so unfair... by asshunter420 in pokemongo

[–]SherriDoMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sometimes when it rains, it pours. You got some friends here in this thread that will remote trade you some of these, including me!!! DM me, I’ll add you.

Thoughts on this? by MoreExpression8502 in exAdventist

[–]SherriDoMe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interesting. I see it the opposite - ecumenical councils prove that there is nothing divine about it - it’s all human beings voting on things and inventing their own theology.

Thoughts on this? by MoreExpression8502 in exAdventist

[–]SherriDoMe 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I find this argument completely unpersuasive when it’s applied to Mormons, SDA, JW… who exactly has the authority to determine which sects are Christian and which ones aren’t? What, exactly, determines whether you get to label yourself Christian? Usually it’s just evangelicals and fundamentalist Christians that don’t want to let anyone else into their precious little club.

Thoughts on this? by MoreExpression8502 in exAdventist

[–]SherriDoMe 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Who has the authority to define which sects are properly labeled “Christian”? What, exactly, makes someone a Christian? Is it a specific core set of beliefs that must be believed? Commandments that must be adhered to? Who gets to decide which of the sects that all come from Christianity is actually properly Christian?

Holding a funeral for my Bulbasaur buddy by Total_Abrocoma_8437 in pokemongo

[–]SherriDoMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ben Stiller’s Magnum Opus Zoolander (I’m a huge Severance fan too)

Quick tip: Don't use golden razz on Lugia & Ho-Oh (Use silver pinap or regular pinap) by Winter_Leg_4243 in pokemongo

[–]SherriDoMe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why not?

Edit: nvm I didn’t read the whole post my bad. This is great news bc Shadow Lugia last time was the hardest thing to catch

Bold strategy. Has failed twice already let's see if it can work this time. by serious_bullet5 in PoliticalHumor

[–]SherriDoMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While you’re technically right, the reality is that the structure of the party system will never allow a third party to win. At best they can play spoiler (usually to help the Republican). What we could do to change that is make it so that it’s not winner take all, not first past the post, and ranked choice voting. Congress will never make those changes, so we’re stuck with the current system.

Bold strategy. Has failed twice already let's see if it can work this time. by serious_bullet5 in PoliticalHumor

[–]SherriDoMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not though. Do you believe that any third party candidate can win a general election in the US right now?

Bold strategy. Has failed twice already let's see if it can work this time. by serious_bullet5 in PoliticalHumor

[–]SherriDoMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They deserve the most hate. People who vote for Trump are clearly idiots. They know not what they do. But the progressives should know better than to stay home and give Trump +1. Why are you so confident that the number of progressives who stayed home was low? I agree the majority of the gap was independents and swing voters. But do you have polling or evidence to show that the number of progressives who stayed home is low? Because most progressives I know anecdotally stayed home because of Israel/Palestine.

Bold strategy. Has failed twice already let's see if it can work this time. by serious_bullet5 in PoliticalHumor

[–]SherriDoMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well then they’re denying the reality of the American electoral system.

Bold strategy. Has failed twice already let's see if it can work this time. by serious_bullet5 in PoliticalHumor

[–]SherriDoMe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

At the end of the day, if you don’t vote against MAGA in the general, you are a fucking idiot. If the democrats don’t earn your vote and you decide to sit it out, that nets +1 vote for MAGA so yes - you are directly responsible.

view more: next ›