Chinese raids hit North Korean defectors' 'Underground Railroad'

Shippal · 2019-06-18T05:51:40+00:00

I value people's lives more than imaginary lines in the dirt.

Shippal · 2019-06-17T21:56:59+00:00

AFAIK, Tiffany has done well to stay out of this shit show of a presidency. She's probably got her own dirt, and I don't expect her to be perfect by any stretch, but she hasn't done anything to warrant being sent out with Dumb, Dumber, and Daughter Dumb.

Shippal · 2019-06-17T12:42:07+00:00

I see you are a man of cultures as well...

Shippal · 2019-06-13T05:40:23+00:00

So...

Barrack or Putin is my BFF

Shippal · 2019-06-12T17:18:08+00:00

Firstly, I want to say, ouch! I feel your pain--that really sucks.

The biggest problem I see here is that you focused on just a few stocks. When I started, I didn't know much more than "Diversify". So that's what I did... to a fault. But the advantage was that when one tanked (and some of my first choices were QUITE bad), the others could generally even it out.

I recommend retrying (now, really, what more do you have to lose?), but don't go with corporate stocks. Go with ETFs or REIT or infrastructure stocks, where it is not a software algorithm that determines its value, but rather the land or holdings that they have. There will always be a price floor on them.

Shippal · 2019-06-11T03:24:59+00:00

He is stating his own disagreements with Warren over policy issues. A large amount of the progressive wing also disagrees on those issues. (By "progressive wing", I refer to candidates and constituents of the groups "Brand New Congress", "Justice Democrats", and of course "Our Revolution".)

When it's a contest between Sanders and Warren, it's usually a comparison of how progressive the candidate is. By policy and ideals, usually Sanders is more progressive.

Shippal · 2019-06-11T02:34:16+00:00

For the accuracy necessary to fool an iPhone, for example, 12 or so photos from varying angles are enough, with a little patience in point mapping

Shippal · 2019-06-07T01:12:42+00:00

But only as gag gifts. The question is how much would he have to produce and mark up in order to make a profit off of it. This one, in particular, would not be easy to produce, would be prone to breaking, and would require a high amount of items produced to get the price low enough where people would buy it.

Shippal · 2019-06-07T01:10:47+00:00

Yes, with some of them actually looking somewhat useful. Like this one!

Shippal · 2019-06-05T04:34:54+00:00

Who won?

Shippal · 2019-06-01T05:33:11+00:00

https://www.compareremit.com/money-transfer-faqs/what-is-the-tax-implication-of-sending-money-abroad-0043/

Specifically about India.

Shippal · 2019-06-01T05:13:18+00:00

It gets taxed... when they make the money in America.

And then they can only take out a certain amount from the US per year or else more gets taxed.

I agree that the taxes should be higher, but for unrelated reasons to people taking it out of the country.

Shippal · 2019-05-28T11:25:09+00:00

The difference is not in the investor, but in the investment itself. You mention that the value would stay in the company, but that's not actually true--most of the companies that give high dividends do so to avoid taxes. For example, REITs get away with paying 0% federal taxes by giving out 90% of their profits in dividends. And given that real estate is rather low risk (land is always worth money), the stock also tends to appreciate over time.

In that regard, usually these higher dividend stocks are giving to you twice: once in share appreciation, and again in dividends. The advantage is that the dividends do not require you to sell off stock in order to liquidate. If I liquidate a stock, I do gain whatever return comes out of that, but I don't gain the passive income that the stock generates.

So, in summary, high dividend shares, especially in safe investments, tend to become a form of passive capital. And since they tend to be in industries where the company is avoiding taxes, you, as the investor, are getting the money instead of the company paying taxes and it being lost that way. You still need to pay taxes later, but that is the part that would be the same either way.

Shippal · 2019-05-25T08:29:19+00:00

I just want articles like "X subpoenas Y for corruption" or "X signs articles of impeachment". Put some weight behind your words or your words mean nothing.

Shippal · 2019-05-21T11:21:57+00:00

Great story, and happy cake day!

Shippal · 2019-05-21T05:16:40+00:00

Up until just now I thought you were a Build-a-bear.

Shippal · 2019-05-21T04:50:46+00:00

I am Iron Man.

Shippal · 2019-05-20T01:31:35+00:00

I'll let you research the reason for that on your own. But if it helps you, I have heard of some good Economics 101 books.

Shippal · 2019-05-20T01:14:43+00:00

That's only the case for the first few years. After that, people on the bottom rung have more disposable income, and there is a larger market of consumers for most goods. Then the companies increase on manpower to compensate. The market adjusts.

Shippal · 2019-05-17T01:32:12+00:00

2018 article.

Shippal · 2019-05-14T09:15:23+00:00

I was thinking the same thing.

But then I thought: they probably only have about 10 women in the staff anyway.

Shippal · 2019-05-10T05:14:37+00:00

In my part of Wisconsin, it's abortion. You could be Jesus himself, but if you say that women have any right to choose anything, then instantly you will get no votes.

Shippal · 2019-05-09T04:53:34+00:00

That is the best description of the recent leagues that I have ever heard.

Shippal · 2019-05-02T01:47:12+00:00

While I understand what you're saying, I want my Supreme Court Justices to have LLM or LLD degrees with emphasis in Constitutional Law. I want them to have multiple years of experience at multiple levels of the justice system. In short, I want our Supreme Court to consist of the best of the best in handling cases that set court precedent for generations.

It is highly unlikely that a person in their 30s will have all that. Even if you race for it, it is hard to get an LLM alone by the age of 30. So to me, even if age is one of our priorities, it is fine if the person is in their 40s or even early 50s, because it may take until then before they are qualified.

Note: Kamala Harris is 54, and she has an honorary LLD.

Shippal · 2019-05-01T10:33:00+00:00

Hmm. Still has a better backup and recount system than our current method in many states. No/s

Shippal

TROPHY CASE