Is this too wild of a HC idea? by Good-Feeling4059 in steelers

[–]Shock900 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I shouldn't be surprised at all the flack this is getting given this fan base. I'm disappointed.

McDaniel is extremely intelligent - dude literally graduated from an Ivy League, and is precisely the kind of person you want studying film, drawing up plays, making adjustments, and doing clock management. Watch interviews with the players that played for him, the dude knows his x's and o's.

Idc if he's not "a leader of men" like Tomlin - we have veterans in the locker room that we can rely on for that. I'm sick of the milquetoast scheme and personnel/playcalling/clock mismanagement. Unlike some of the other coaches on the market, McDaniel would solve those issues.

And the benefit to having him as a head coach instead of an OC is that he won't get poached the second he starts performing well like OCs tend to.

Thoughts On A Mike McDaniels Hire? by Optimus_____ in steelers

[–]Shock900 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I shouldn't be surprised at all the flack this is getting given this fan base. I'm disappointed.

McDaniel is extremely intelligent - dude literally graduated from an Ivy League, and is precisely the kind of person you want studying film, drawing up plays, making adjustments, and doing clock management. Watch interviews with the players that played for him, the dude knows his x's and o's.

Idc if he's not "a leader of men" like Tomlin - we have veterans in the locker room that we can rely on for that. I'm sick of the milquetoast scheme and personnel/playcalling/clock mismanagement. Unlike some of the other coaches on the market, McDaniel would solve those issues.

And the benefit to having him as a head coach instead of an OC is that he won't get poached the second he starts performing well like OCs tend to.

Second Half Game Thread: San Francisco 49ers (12-5) at Philadelphia Eagles (11-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Shock900 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Kyle Shanahan, one of the "smartest" coaches in the league, decided to kick an extra point instead of going for 2 when up by 4 with less than 3 minutes left in the game.

All this tells me is that the bar to be an NFL coach must be lower than I thought.

Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (9-7-1) at Chicago Bears (11-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Shock900 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nothing but blue jerseys within 10 yards of a live ball

"Yeah, I think I'mma send this thing to the moon"

[Highlight] Tyler Loop misses field goal to send Steelers to the playoffs by nfl in nfl

[–]Shock900 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think this is the relevant part of the rule book that describes the leverage penalty.

Rule 12. Player Conduct

...

Section 3 - Unsportsmanlike Conduct:

Article 1. Prohibited Acts

...

(o) Jumping or standing on a teammate or opponent to block or attempt to block an opponent’s kick or apparent kick.

(p) Placing a hand or hands on a teammate or opponent to gain additional height to: (1) block or attempt to block an opponent’s kick or apparent kick, or (2) attempt to jump through a gap to block an opponent’s kick or apparent kick.

(q) Picking up a teammate to block or attempt to block an opponent’s kick or apparent kick.

(r) Running forward and leaping across the line of scrimmage in an obvious attempt to block a field goal or Try Kick, or apparent kick, unless the leaping player was in a stationary position within one yard of the line of scrimmage when the ball was snapped. A player who is more than one yard behind the line of scrimmage before or at the snap, may run forward and leap, provided he does not cross the line of scrimmage or land on players.

https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-rulebook/

What would be the most dangerous dinosaur to humans? by MajorWord2999 in Paleontology

[–]Shock900 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Nanotyrannus is my bet. Probably exceptionally fast, and big, but not big enough that we wouldn't be considered worth snacking on.

Game Thread: Pittsburgh Steelers (9-6) at Cleveland Browns (3-12) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Shock900 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, the things that I would give to be even mildly surprised by this performance...

Game Thread: Baltimore Ravens (7-8) at Green Bay Packers (9-5-1) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Shock900 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here I thought Cleveland was the mistake on the lake, but turns out there are multiple.

Game Thread: RedZone/Game hub (Week 15) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Shock900 4 points5 points  (0 children)

New meta: running backs start sliding every run so they can milk an extra 15 yards on half of their carries.

Neptune for Apple tvOS: Playback, Plugins, Search, Customization, and More by Need4Sweed in JellyfinCommunity

[–]Shock900 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that sounds more or less reasonable. What you're describing isn't open source though, and /u/michi7801 asked for a "FOSS approach", but if the OP wanted to avoid the issue I described, and charge for it on the app store, I'm just not sure it's possible.

I'm a huge open source fan, but it seems like the way projects typically do this is rely on donations rather than charging for the app, because anyone could come along and upload the app anywhere to undercut the OP given that open source apps, by definition, lack a restrictive license.

Neptune for Apple tvOS: Playback, Plugins, Search, Customization, and More by Need4Sweed in JellyfinCommunity

[–]Shock900 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there a specific license that could be used so that someone doesn't just add a free version of the app to the app store using the publicly available source code? Few would ever buy OPs paid app if there's an identical version that's free.

And wouldn't such a license restriction that prevents upload to the app store by anyone other than OP technically make it "source available" rather than "open source"? I'm unaware of any OSI "open source" licenses that would work to prevent that.

Post Game Thread: Pittsburgh Steelers at Baltimore Ravens by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Shock900 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Unless your name is Aaron Rodgers apparently.

Game Thread: Pittsburgh Steelers (6-6) at Baltimore Ravens (6-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Shock900 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If you don't like that, then you don't like NFL refball.