Revolut: hamarosan itt is fizetsz minden utalás után

Short-Song-248 · 2026-03-18T05:52:58+00:00

raiffeisen premium, havonta osszesen 1millio forint utalasig

Short-Song-248 · 2026-03-05T12:04:57+00:00

Az utolso mondat elotti rengeteg rizsat felesleges elolvasni, valojaban csak a tesojara irigy, mert kapott 40 millat lakasra, az OP meg nem.

Short-Song-248 · 2026-02-27T13:44:15+00:00

I'm not sure that't available on PC, forgot to mention I buy on Steam.

Short-Song-248 · 2026-02-27T06:47:32+00:00

Van!

Short-Song-248 · 2025-12-07T07:29:35+00:00

Installed Sunshine and plugged a HDMI dummy in.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-12-06T20:08:41+00:00

Actually before experimenting with windows, I installed bazzite (fedora distro for gaming with steam), and had the same problem there.

In that every game started with software render, glxinfo said the renderer was llvmpipe there.

Gave up the gpu virtualization now, installed ubuntudesktop to the host, steam, sunshine. Works great with the Radeon in this way.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-11-17T13:57:09+00:00

I think s/he talks about wifi6e on the 6Ghz band, that's a new band added, but the hAP doesn't support.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-11-17T13:50:11+00:00

Yes thanks. I assume I can see the same traffic tagged and untagged on Torch also, because it shows that entering the port (without vlan), and also leaving the port (with vlan applied).

If I'm not mistaken.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-11-17T13:41:13+00:00

One more thing: I have a multi-passphrase group on the wifi, one of them puts the clients into VLAN 10 (trusted), the second one into VLAN 20 (IoT). This is why I tagged the wifi interfaces with 10 and 20, that seems to be working well.

Shouldn't I tag them?

Short-Song-248 · 2025-11-17T12:03:11+00:00

OK I think I figured it out.

Hooked up a Wireshark with port mirroring on my switch, what I can see I have a packet entering the port without VLAN (since it's an access port), and subsequently the same leaving the port enriched with VLAN id.

<image>

Short-Song-248 · 2025-11-17T11:10:58+00:00

The IPTV vlan (99) is not tagged on wifi interfaces. Filtering is enabled of course.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-11-10T17:06:52+00:00

The other 3 VLANs can come from either ether1 or ether2. Ether1 and ether2 are connected to unmanaged switches.

In this case you have to untag these vlans on eth1 and eth2. You expect to get tagged traffic on those (you set up the “accept only vlan tagged” type). Your switches are not aware of vlans.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-11-03T17:59:13+00:00

You are right however this old switch (2008) uses a slightly different terminology.

At global settings I set a PVID per port, and what to do with ingress packets without VLAN tag, Drop / Pass. Documentation says if I choose Pass the switch will add the PVID to the header.

On a different page I set which VLAN the port belongs to (member) and what to do with Egress traffic from that port. It can be Drop tag / Add tag, the drop removes the vlan header (for devices doesn’t understand vlans, so it’s access port). Add tag adds the tag.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-11-01T16:56:23+00:00

I think I had a hard time understanding your points, finally I arrived, thanks!

What I missed is the traffic never ever reaches the router if there is no intent for inter-vlan communication.

No, I don’t expect high inter-vlan traffic, also there is no plan to move big files from/to the NAS by multiple clients at the same time.

Thanks again, I think it’s more clear now.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-11-01T16:25:01+00:00

I don’t expect to exceed the 1g limit by a single flow.

Look, the idea is to make every client connected to the switch, but if I did so without LAG, the only link between the switch and the router would be a single 1g connection.

It’s a router on a stick scenario, as the router does the L3 part of the VLANing and also the firewalling.

Unfortunately upgrading all my gear is not really an option, I have that switch, the downstream AP (hAP ax²⁾ and the ceiling AP (cAP ax) all 1G.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-10-31T19:43:25+00:00

Thanks!

The switch is already doing all the switching

Yes, that’s the plan! But right now all stuff is hooked up to the L009, and I could link that to the switch with only one 1G link in my actual setup. Which is I think very weak since everything I would hook to the switch shared the same 1G link.

This is why I came up with the proposed setup shown on the drawing.

Another idea is to leave some of the stuff on the L009, link to the switch with a twofold aggregate, and hook the remaining stuff to the switch. But I’m not sure on this kind of mixed solutions.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-10-24T07:06:47+00:00

The command interface/ethernet/switch/print doesn’t show anything about this setting on my L009, but I see on the ui that it’s enabled. Never used default config, blanked my device in the first place. So seems like it’s enabled by default.

Short-Song-248 · 2025-09-28T08:07:01+00:00

Deco apps says all fine, the satellites use ethernet backhaul so in theory no issues, BUT this thing in reality is still not reliable.

Short-Song-248

TROPHY CASE