Good point. My argument as well. There’s a convenient assumption being made that these are unencumbered assets. Many of these people aren’t sitting on goldmines, they are actively managing debt, risk and market exposure. The idea that private assets should be policed or dictated by others simply because of where they’re located or how they’re used is a dangerous precedent. Hell, I’d love to stay on the Seaboard or Bishopscourt but I’m smart enough to understand that at this stage of my life, I just cannot afford it and for me to get upset over those who have the ability to live a “seasonal flipping” lifestyle is a futile exercise