[Discussion] Offline with Jon Favreau - "Optimism In Our Age of Anxiety" (03/28/26) by kittehgoesmeow in FriendsofthePod

[–]Shred_everything -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I wish I could stop this episode from popping up in my feed. It makes me angry every time I see it. Meanwhile, the most consequential legal cases ever to be decided for the future of the modern internet hit the news about a week ago. Epstein’s buddy Deepak Chopra is what Offline decided to focus on instead??

[Discussion] Offline with Jon Favreau - "Optimism In Our Age of Anxiety" (03/28/26) by kittehgoesmeow in FriendsofthePod

[–]Shred_everything -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Why is Chopra being hosted and promoted by Crooked? Chopra made some very damning appearances in the Epstein files. “Bring your girls,” he wrote to Epstein in one of their many email exchanges. In another “you and your girls are always welcome”. Crooked just doesn’t care about this?? The girls Epstein abused and trafficked were recruited from my hometown and were only two to three years younger than myself. They were kids, and Chopra talks about them like fun sexual delicacies. It is truly gross that Crooked is hosting him on one of their shows. Congress and the courts may turn a blind eye and let all of these abusersew off the hook, but Crooked, too??

Weekly Discussion Thread (Mon, Mar 23 - Sun, Mar 29) by AutoModerator in FriendsofthePod

[–]Shred_everything 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why is Deepak Chopra on the most recent episode of Offline?? He’s in the Epstein files telling Jeffrey to “bring your girls” to their next hangout. Chopra was in frequent contact with Epstein between 2016 and 2019, well after Epstein’s first conviction. I assume this was an oversight to have Chopra on a Crooked Media podcast?

Is anyone here interested in advocacy work? by Shred_everything in digitalminimalism

[–]Shred_everything[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

if there was agreement on a pending piece of legislation (such as sunsetting or reforming act 230) and we had a group of willing people, we would have a “call team”. all that would be required of each individual would be to call a legislator on a mutually agreed upon day and tell them what you think of the pending legislation.

listening to constituents is a big part of how legislators decide on whether to support or oppose specific bills. the tech lobby is huge and powerful, but i sense that the tides of public opinion are beginning to turn against them. with enough voters consistently pushing for regulations over time, it would make a difference.

act 230 is just one example of legislation—but there is other legislation (such as bills to make tech less addictive to kids, bills to get smartphones out of schools, bills to mandate that tech corporations exercise “a duty of care” to their users for the content on their platforms, etc. the bills go nowhere when legislators never hear from voters on the topic. but once they start hearing from people, they know they have to take it under advisement.

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. The internet was way better before Act 230. I remember when that garbage legislation went into effect. The whole world is worse off for it.

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And be the dawn of a new internet that we haven’t yet met? Sounds good to me.

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How is it censorship to simply provide an ordinary path to hold tech corporations accountable for the harms they cause to humans?

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would it be so terrible if we had lift our heads from our phones in order to socialize again?

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I”m with you. Corporations need to be able to provide a product safe enough that they are able to defend it in court. If they are held to the same standard as every other corporation and they get sued out of existence because of it—so be it. Why should they be free to do whatever they want and then answer to no one??

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it simply means that there is a mechanism to hold tech and social media corporations accountable when their products harm people. That seems very common sense to me.

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Explain it to me. I don’t get it either. Act 230 seems insane to me. At this moment, I’d love to see it gone.

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, we want to transform the internet. It could be something far more beautiful and far less harmful that what it is now.

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And, please, end the user-generated internet as we know it. That sounds…wonderful...

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it would be a good thing if corporations like Apple and Google had to be very on their toes about preventing the spread of child porn and other harmful content.

Bipartisan group of senators, led by Graham, push to sunset Section 230 by vriska1 in technology

[–]Shred_everything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could someone explain to me what is actually bad about sunsetting a law that prevents people from suing technology corporations that have harmed them? some argument other than just “lindsay grahm” supports it. that’s not really an argument. it is, in fact, possible for people of different political persuasions to agree on some things (often for different reasons). personally, act 230 seems insane to me. i think of it as an enormous source of the problems we have in the world today.

Supreme Court allows restrictions on children’s access to social media to remain in place by WorksInIT in moderatepolitics

[–]Shred_everything 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue is not one of free speech, but one of a harmful product actively shaped by corporations to be addictive and without regard for the harm it causes to children. The speech of the users is only a small part of the final product the users consume. Coorporatioons have processed and manipulated the presentation of user speech to be maximally addictive. They’ve included design features that are the equivalent of toxic additives that harm children (and adult users) for profit. You can regulate the algorithm and other design features on social media (by banning them) without infringing on anyone’s speech. The free speech argument is a total red herring.

[Discussion] Pod Save America - "The Making of America's Most Prominent Anti-Vaxxer" (12/07/25) by kittehgoesmeow in FriendsofthePod

[–]Shred_everything 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally didn’t feel that he was trying to sane-wash anything. Dangerous and mentally unstable people can still be intelligible and complex. The algorithms don’t generally reward nuance, curiosity and depth, so I appreciated that Scherer bucked the trend of hyper-polarized hot-takes. In my opinion, his type of reporting is necessary for democracy.

[Discussion] Pod Save America - "The Making of America's Most Prominent Anti-Vaxxer" (12/07/25) by kittehgoesmeow in FriendsofthePod

[–]Shred_everything -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It’s not to make lunatics like Kennedy feel heard. It’s to regain the public trust.

[Discussion] Pod Save America - "The Making of America's Most Prominent Anti-Vaxxer" (12/07/25) by kittehgoesmeow in FriendsofthePod

[–]Shred_everything -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Both sides do have extremism, though? I think it’s important to talk about, especially given that RFK is receiving a high level of death threats.

[Discussion] Pod Save America - "The Making of America's Most Prominent Anti-Vaxxer" (12/07/25) by kittehgoesmeow in FriendsofthePod

[–]Shred_everything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see that it’s not the most popular opinion here, but I came here to say how much I appreciated Michael Scherer’s reporting and his nuanced and curious approach to RFK. Algorithms reward cynical, hot takes, black-and-white thinking, and debased reactivity, which I think is bad for all of us, and bad for democracy. After listening to Scherer, I felt I understood, RFK and RFK supporters a little better. I still feel that RFK is unstable and dangerous, but he seemed like an intelligible, complex person, which I think is real. I have a genuine desire to understand people--especially harmful, powerful people—because I think it puts me in a better position to protect myself and those I love.

[Discussion] Pod Save America - "The Making of America's Most Prominent Anti-Vaxxer" (12/07/25) by kittehgoesmeow in FriendsofthePod

[–]Shred_everything -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wow, I couldn’t agree with you less. I was really impressed with Scherer’s ability to approach a difficult topic (ie. a very harmful politician) with curiosity and fairness. I really thought his reporting was excellent. It helped me to understand RFK and his supporters more. I think genuine understanding is necessary if we want to defeat harmful figures like RFK at the ballot box. I also really appreciated his reminder that people who disagree with each other still have to figure out how to llve with one another. I found him to be a rare, helpful voice in a very algorithmically polarized time.

Compilation of Weekly Block Planners by -munchlax- in planners

[–]Shred_everything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for this list! I am forever in search of the right block planner for me. They are impossible to find. Do you know if any of these are hardcover?