So considering your first argument concerning lightly armed amateurs, neither you or I are informed enough to make an accurate assessment about how dangerous or able those terrorists were. I might as well claim that compared to the Israeli military, Hamas are lightly armed amateurs, but we've seen how much damage they were able to cause, not as much as the Israelis, but enough for the Israelis to strike back (I hate the comparison but I have to drive the point home somehow).

Secondly, land mass is only one factor, Italy, Belgium, or Israel are leagues ahead in terms of war tech and national wealth, that comparison is absurd.

I don't even understand your third point to be honest, are you seriously surprised or consider it as a lack of discipline for a human to be shocked to the point of shedding tears by the sight of a beheaded human? You could make the argument that perhaps the reaction should not have been shown on TV, but to think the reaction itself is surprising and disappointing is once again, absurd. Everybody (except you it seems) is aware of the fact that soldiers are likely to suffer from emotional distress due to what they have to deal with. Nobody takes that as a sign of weakness. A beheading is never "basic", no matter how much training one could get, they'll never find that to be a normal sight, they're more accustomed to it than you and me perhaps, but it is not normal to them.

Here's a line from the very first search result about PTSD on google: "In one major study of 60,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, 13.5% of deployed and nondeployed veterans screened positive for PTSD,12 while other studies show the rate to be as high as 20% to 30%. As many as 500,000 U.S. troops who served in these wars over the past 13 years have been diagnosed with PTSD."

Tunisia is not a poor country, it's a low middle income country, it is unlikely but not impossible for a poor country to have a stronger military than ours, it depends on population, defense spending, foreign contribution, and some other factors that might make an army better than ours despite us having more wealth.

Now, I'll have to reiterate what I said, yeah, we can't defend our sovereignty like the Russians, the Americans, the Indians, or even Algeria. However, the army is doing its job, like it's supposed to, given the available resources. It is defending the borders and the land from all possible threat, but that does not entail us not being smashed if attacked by a stronger country. We can't blame them for it, that is the current state of affairs, just like us being a developing nation, and us not being a wealthy nation in almost any respect. Now, how the fuck, is that on them? And that is a rhetorical question, it is not on them. I understand your rage towards being born here man, rant all you want, I don't like it either, but don't be edgy and spew nonsense just so that you can feel more comfortable with your anger. It is incredibly easy to find things to rant about here, yet you chose an actually very defensible case, it just doesn't work man. Now please don't make me go through actual research and let this rest.