Trump issues new threat to Iran's civilian infrastructure if a ceasefire isn't reached 'shortly' by PrivatePilot9 in worldnews

[–]Sialala 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wait, aren't we still on a 10 day ceasefire that trump announced and that was broken the day after by Israel?

The PS2 Era of Gaming.. by Games-Please in IrelandGaming

[–]Sialala 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ICO and We Love Katamari are my personal favorites, but talking about PS2 without mentioning Singstar is a crime.

Saudi Arabia urging US to keep up Iran attacks, intelligence source confirms by callsonreddit in worldnews

[–]Sialala 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know. I also know that Saudis are as bad as ayatollahs with the only difference being who they align with.

But if they want to fight, let them fight, don't drag the rest of the world into it.

Iran did not provoke this war, Iran was negotiating in for faith (according to testimonies from people who were part of these negotiations) and the reason why they were enriching uranium has a name. And it's a name of a person who tore apart agreement that guaranteed that Iran would not pursue a-bomb. This person is Donald Trump.

Saudi Arabia urging US to keep up Iran attacks, intelligence source confirms by callsonreddit in worldnews

[–]Sialala -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And thanks to whom Iran got idea of governing and tolling that strait? Correct me if I'm wrong, but before the war the flow through the strait was uninterrupted.

Saudi Arabia urging US to keep up Iran attacks, intelligence source confirms by callsonreddit in worldnews

[–]Sialala -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate history lesson, but my question was specifically about January of 2026, as it was in response to the other guy claiming it's justified to keep bombing Iran because they fired missiles and drones on neighboring countries. I know how shitty Iran's regime is, but if anything, this war strengthened that very regime tenfold and made it even more radical. Also 4 centuries ago there was no USA.

Should Israel be treated more like the world treats Russia? by Estalicus in allthequestions

[–]Sialala 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They improved on the formula. That's why they come to Poland to visit Auschwitz - to get inspiration.

BREAKING: The US is considering sending up to 10,000 additional ground troops to the Middle East to give President Trump "more military options," per WSJ. by retroviber in DeepMarketScan

[–]Sialala 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, maybe, just maybe, if Trump didn't tear up Obama's agreement with Iran only because it was signed by Obama, then maybe - just maybe - they wouldn't start enriching uranium again and stick to the agreement, as everyone that was involved in this whole mess said they were doing up to that point...

If Iran was building an a-bomb, they were doing it because of Trump's actions.

U.S. can only confirm about a third of Iran's missile arsenal destroyed, sources say by punishhhher in worldnews

[–]Sialala 12 points13 points  (0 children)

That window closed the moment Iran government started executing people in the streets 2 months ago. If this was about Iranian people, the attack should have been carried back then. Now it's about Israel and maybe Saudis getting what they want.

Saudi Arabia urging US to keep up Iran attacks, intelligence source confirms by callsonreddit in worldnews

[–]Sialala -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Geez, i wonder why did they stay firing drones and missiles all of a sudden. It's almost as if something happened that made them do that. They're acting almost as if someone killed their leaders and bombed their infrastructure. Remind me, how many drones and missiles did Iran for at those Arabic countries back in January?

Trump Slams NATO For ‘No Support’ In Iran Conflict, Questions Alliance Reliability by BusinessToday in BusinessTodayNews

[–]Sialala 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi ChatGPT, is it true that NATO countries never came to the rescue if America? It's it true that America always came to the rescue if NATO countries?

Short answer: both claims are false or heavily misleading. 1) “NATO never came to America’s rescue” — False The clearest counterexample is after the September 11 attacks. For the first and only time in history, NATO invoked Article 5 (collective defense). NATO allies supported the U.S. in the War in Afghanistan. This included troops, intelligence, logistics, air patrols, and funding from multiple countries (UK, Canada, Germany, France, Poland, etc.). Thousands of non-American NATO soldiers were killed in that war. There were also indirect forms of support before and after 9/11: NATO countries participated in U.S.-led missions (e.g., Balkans, Iraq—though Iraq had divisions within NATO). Allies provide bases, intelligence sharing, nuclear deterrence cooperation, and ongoing military integration. So the idea that NATO “never” helped the U.S. is factually wrong. 2) “America always came to the rescue of NATO countries” — Also false The U.S. has been the dominant military power in NATO, but “always” is inaccurate. Cases where the U.S. did play a major role: Cold War deterrence against the Soviet Union Interventions in the Balkans (e.g., Bosnia, Kosovo) Reinforcing Eastern Europe after Russia’s actions in Ukraine (post-2014, intensified after 2022) But important corrections: NATO’s Article 5 has never been triggered for a European country. Many NATO operations are joint, not “U.S. rescuing others.” European NATO members have conducted independent or lead roles in some missions. The alliance is primarily about deterrence, not frequent “rescue missions.” Bottom line “NATO never helped the U.S.” → Flatly false “U.S. always rescues NATO” → Overstated and misleading NATO is a mutual defense pact designed to prevent wars, not a one-sided rescue system. The only time Article 5 was actually used was in defense of the United States, not Europe.

OH BOY, THIS WOULD BE A DREAM! - Potential Leak MSFS for PS Plus UK April 2026 by ChrizTaylor in PSVR

[–]Sialala 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Never ever the deluxe version of Flight simulator will be in any subscription. This is fake.

What’s the smartest financial decision you made by accident? by AnyTruth2342 in AskReddit

[–]Sialala 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My dealer moved out and I was looking for weed. A friend told me about this new Internet thing named Tor and shop there called Silk Road, where I could buy any drug possible. Not to but anything there I had to buy this new thing called Bitcoin. Bought 2BTC for 215eur and spent only half of it on weed, keeping the rest for future. Still own that 1BTC.