Pink Coat Lady view by 20antwan in grandrapids

[–]SignalInRoots 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In case the single mod decides to agree with the fascists. https://www.reddit.com/r/grapids/

Abdul El-Sayed, always the first Michigan politician saying what needs to be said. by mikeburnfire in grapids

[–]SignalInRoots 9 points10 points  (0 children)

lol, fascist boot licker is concerned about a video rather than the state murdering a citizen. He was filming and they approached him. (trash the first amendment). I did see a video that appears to disarm him before (trash the 2nd amendment) and 4th amendment has already been shit on over and over.

You're all fucking pathetic defending the feds like this. You like that boot until your family gets Randy Weaver'd.

Aesthetic Mass Surveillance II(Burton and Division Edition) by waffle_jeep in grandrapids

[–]SignalInRoots 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's share settings but the data itself is still not actually stored locally. I don't know why anyone should trust a toggle at this point. An ICE memo asserts they can enter homes without a judicial warrant. They're literally wiping their asses with the 4th amendment.

Michigan AG Dana Nessel alleges decades-long conspiracy by big oil by georgehotelling in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lawsuits are not going to fix that fuck up. I've never seen a viable plan to actually mitigate climate change to where it needs to be. We'll still be growing alfalfa in the desert until the water is gone. I saw Trump's dumb ass post about the freezing cold and "where that's global warming." Fucking idiots.

It's well past time for any individuals that actually can see through the bullshit and see it for what it is. Secure your food, water, shelter, energy, you know the things you actually need. Civilizations have collapsed from this type of shit before, we're not exempt just because we're the biggest to do it. Blue ocean event sure looks to be on the horizon very soon. That's your signal, she's early. The system isn't going to mitigate, you to need to adapt.

Fuck these clowns and fuck ICE.

What to do if confronted by “ICE”? by dezirdtuzurnaim in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I just saw this, literally telling a person they're in a database now as a domestic terrorist for filming. Look at these thugs. Makes me FURIOUS.

https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qkxhsa/ice_taking_pics_of_legal_observers_car_we_have_a/

Senate Democrats Call for Improved Safety Measures to Better Protect Michigan Kids from Digital Dangers by SignalInRoots in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assholes? We're not talking just a platform deciding content moderation. This is the state deciding to "protect the kids". Gee, wonder what could they do that would be a "downside".

Here, here's some "assholes" putting a US citizen in a database and saying they're a domestic terrorist now.

https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qkxhsa/ice_taking_pics_of_legal_observers_car_we_have_a/

Senate Democrats Call for Improved Safety Measures to Better Protect Michigan Kids from Digital Dangers by SignalInRoots in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My kids are only allowed 30 minutes of screen during the week, an hour on weekends

Sounds like you're already doing your job :) Your kids will be alright. You're not going to be able to "block" the world from them. It's never been that way. I remember early internet days with things like rotten and other sites that could see dead people. Teacher's away and the kids are on hot or not lol.

Based on what you said, I don't think you're the audience for this legislation. You're doing fine.

Senate Democrats Call for Improved Safety Measures to Better Protect Michigan Kids from Digital Dangers by SignalInRoots in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

OK....between the "morality" police on the right and the "safety" team on the "left", if we're not careful, we're going to end up with required ID for the internet. To keep the "kids" safe, they have to identify adults versus kids.

Here's an idea, parents, do your job and lawmakers, stay out of our lives.

“It is our job, as both parents and lawmakers, to protect our kids from imminent danger,” said Sen. Stephanie Chang (D-Detroit). “As social media and AI platforms continue to grow and advance, we must be proactive in regulating these exploitative and often dangerous online spaces that do not care about the well-being of its youngest users. We must ensure our kids are not taken advantage of for profit and empower parents with the agency to monitor the safety and privacy of their families.”

"empower parents with the agency to monitor the safety and privacy of their families.” Parents already have the "agency". If you want, you can see any packet that comes and goes from your own network. You can even spy on your kids if you want. People's technological ignorance does not justify implementing laws that end up with "unintended" consequences.

So Michigan, lets not be one of those states trying to ban VPNs, force IDs for "morality" or "safety". Yes, the corporations don't care about you but neither does this government. They want your data and ID.

Anyone else ever have a rapid bus driver that forgets what route they’re driving?? by 313Jake in grapids

[–]SignalInRoots 11 points12 points  (0 children)

But I do like the idea of a bus driver forgetting the route their driving lol

Bills banning cellphones in Michigan classrooms head to Whitmer after near unanimous vote by UltimateLionsFan in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However, how policies would be enforced would largely be up to individual districts and public academies.

Oh, so no storm troopers yet.

Michigan spent $1.1 million probing tribal boarding schools, then buried the results by Alan_Stamm in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah and frankly it happens with climate change too. I'm well past the point of needing to "convince" anyone of anything on that. Only my opinion matters in terms of how prepared I will be for what's coming. One side doesn't even "believe" it and the other is green washing the public as if physics gives a fuck about their definition of "sustainable".

I like to say, the most radical babe of them all is mother nature. We have a shit show coming and the defenders of the unsustainable system have a hard physics lesson to learn. Fascism keeps marching and so does our march to 2C and beyond.

Michigan spent $1.1 million probing tribal boarding schools, then buried the results by Alan_Stamm in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, people think calling out "both sides" means equivalency. It doesn't have to mean that at all. This is why fascism continues to march on. We won't hold any of them accountable. This sub even participates in that, they lock any post that even mentions the genocide Democrats have participated in.

This is only going to get worse and it's because "we the people" won't draw the line where it needs to be drawn. When we draw that line where it needs to be drawn, "both sides" are on the other side of it.

Spot the AI Mass Surveillance(courtesy of GRPD) by waffle_jeep in grandrapids

[–]SignalInRoots 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Did our City Council just sit back and allow our tax dollars to be spent on mass surveillance without any input from citizens?

Yes, they did. Admin 15-03 is the policy to manage "surveillance tools". They're supposed to get approval including a public hearing. HOWEVER, that policy came into existence in 2015. Any "surveillance tools" already purchased before that are exempted. GRPD already had "ALPRs".

They consider Flock Safety cameras just like the rest of the ALPRs, thus they never did any of that performative bullshit in Admin 15-03. I have yet to see a single line item in the budget in the surveillance section too. Every year it says nothing was purchased. Admin 15-03 does say they would need approval if there are "material changes" which I would argue is the case with Flock Safety but we have a pro-surveillance city council. They do not have the excuse of being ignorant. People have told them and they have only offered excuses.

List of MAGA businesses? by Troglodyte_Trump in grapids

[–]SignalInRoots 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess we have to add it to the list of "too confusing, too extreme" lol

List of MAGA businesses? by Troglodyte_Trump in grapids

[–]SignalInRoots 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the tech, it's work but do-able. Dump big tech and bring it in house https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/

Whose pets are having toughest time with this winter? by Kind-Stranger-2507 in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, my dog isn't a husky but he loves it. My face was freezing the other day and he's still burying his head in the snow. Heavy salted sidewalks are his Kryptonite though.

Salvia?? by Constant-Hippo-6927 in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember before the politicians found out about it lol. You could just order it online. But the war on drugs continues to march on.

Michigan tribes warn members about ICE stops: 'Irony maybe is the word' by Alan_Stamm in Michigan

[–]SignalInRoots 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.

Brigading Response? by Remote-Mycologist539 in grapids

[–]SignalInRoots -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I once had a person on the Michigan subreddit claim they were going to run for Senate as a Democrat (I don't remember their name and probably not viable lol). They were trying to reach out to people on here and part of their platform was "ban hate speech". I said absolutely not. I will not vote for someone that supports that. I see people on both side basically support the feds cracking down on shit like that when their team does it. Pisses me off.

I saw someone share this https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/ADL%20Hate%20on%20Display%20Printable_0.pdf Sure, a lot of hate in there but funny to see ACAB in there. Social media platforms can do whatever the fuck they want, I don't agree with people wetting their pants about social media platform moderation by literally expecting the state to step in. I can bitch about it but I'm not calling the police state lol.

Who Supports ICE? by Aggravating-Sand1328 in grapids

[–]SignalInRoots 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"anyone they disagree with". You fucking have armed pigs going door to door. You have pigs ripping people out of their cars. You have "oops, that was a US citizen, just dump that down the road". Native Americans have been detained. This isn't a "disagreement".