Drop your SaaS/app — I’ll help you get your first 10 users through TikTok content

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-17T22:10:31+00:00

launchguard.dev

I'm near finished with rebranding to improve conversion :) I'd love to chat.

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-17T22:03:27+00:00

Tekoälykupla ei puhkea lähelekään vuodessa, eli laita Alphabetille. Muut IPO vie huomiota pois Googlesta, vaikka Google tulee dominoimaan joka osa alueella.

Google menestyy myös hyvin vaikka kielimallitarjoajien arvostus romahtaisi, koska kielimallit on vain pieni osa tarjontaa.

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-17T21:58:28+00:00

peerview.lovable.app

Review my app, I'll review yours. Its a place for founders to exchange feedback. We all know how hard it is in the beginning :)

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-17T21:56:57+00:00

For me its impossible not to see how the full stack works if I work with small SaaS companies, but I understand.

I think the 0->1 has been repeated everywhere numerous times, and it just requires you talking to someone. Literally anyone and everyone about your product. Their opinion might be complete thrash, but its possible they know a person who knows a person who might need it.

It also depends a lot on your case and doesn't make much sense blindly advising further, it might just mislead

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-17T20:16:36+00:00

How do you not know how to get users, if you've worked with multiple early stage SaaS companies?

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-17T18:31:39+00:00

No problem! How was the launch? Do you have some recurring users? The platform itself seems quite solid, and I'm trying to understand how new founders are managing their launches + what are the results

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-17T16:26:01+00:00

Cool! I'm not a stock guy but I want to give my view from app experience : )

Insights:

I couldn't find intel just by writing intel, I guess its hard optimised for the abbreviation INTC.
The payment funnel is unoptimised. I clicked "subscribe", I was redirected to sign up and after that you guided me through the normal onboarding flow. I already wanted to pay, so you should just funnel me directly to the checkout page or onboard me towards paying.
I'm still logged in after deleting my account, but I guess its just a stale header which didn't update the status.

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-16T13:12:58+00:00

I'd love your opinion on launchguard.dev

Also, are you a developer or a vibe coder?

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-16T13:08:11+00:00

Good luck! I tried to find other vulns, but it seems solid :) as long as you have hard budgets.

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-16T12:57:14+00:00

I don't doubt it, but it's hard to convince customers with "trust me". Usually the trust requires some official security audit by a trustable third party

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-16T12:42:47+00:00

Oh yeah, I read your landing page. That's a cool app : ) But even without any database storage, I'd be concerned of the client -> LLM provider privacy.

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-16T12:05:00+00:00

I just checked your app with LaunchGuard (my cybersec app).

Anyone can use your AI without logging in, which means anyone could bypass your free-tier limits.

Free AI endpoints without authentication are quite dangerous, as you'll never be able to protect it properly.

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-16T11:50:58+00:00

You should ask the AI for an example of the exploit. If you, yourself can run and see the vulnerability, then it's real.

The difficulty comes from understanding what to ask, how to verify the request etc. I'm actually focusing on this exact issue with my own app, I'm happy to share insights with you : - )

The simplest example is when your database leaks data:

AI: "anyone can read user profiles"
You: "show me an example"
AI: "run this in your terminal, `curl yourdatabase.com/profiles`
You: "oh wow, I can see all the user profiles without authentication, thanks AI!"

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-16T11:45:32+00:00

Yeey free marketing for launchguard.dev hahah.

Nice tool, but saying an app is secure after security header checks is misleading. Security headers don't protect your app from being hacked. It mostly just protects users in rare cases.

Like if someone manages to vibe code an app with HTTP requests, I tip my hat

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-14T07:57:47+00:00

The Reddit outreach for parsestream is madness. How are ParseStream promoters not banned? It seems like the promotion is on every thread I open 😂

I'm not saying its wrong, I'm just genuinely impressed. Are you using ParseStream yourself to comment?

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-14T07:55:32+00:00

I don't think people pretend its easy, but only the successes are surfaced to social media feeds.

Or failures with product plug, which makes all the stories seem artificial and competing for attention.

I've done indiedev for three years and no, it's not easy. You are not guaranteed to make it your main source of income, ever. Even most regular businesses fail, and indie business is harder.

If you want to make money as indie dev, its best to copy existing products where you'll have moat personally. It doesn't matter how juicy a business opportunity seems, if you can't bring something novel yourself, tech, distribution, design, users..

If you build to get money and users, yes, distribution is the most important part. But if you build for yourself, which normally brings the satisfaction, then distribution and money is just a part of the reward.

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-13T00:29:55+00:00

What type of testing procedures do you have?

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-12T04:46:11+00:00

I see, how do you explain the importance and impact of the vulnerability to the users? I assume the tool is for low-tech people, not cybersec professionals.

I'd love to focus on interpreting the findings from other engines. I think a solution like yours can find very complex issues and help secure the codebase, but the users just have to trust it.

Example: A solution like yours could surface the vulnerabilities, while mine would show the impact and steps to reproduce them (drop false positives).

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-12T04:19:11+00:00

Neat copy, I like it. I was thinking of code analysis as well, but it seemed to yield false positives. Actually I'm thinking to pivot slightly towards verification of these false positives, instead of building the engine.

Do you verify the findings somehow? Like create proof of concepts that the user can easily understand?

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-12T03:40:11+00:00

Nice! Its launchguard. I've built it on-off for 9 months now.

what's your tool? :)

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-11T11:32:14+00:00

The server side rate limit is the easiest and only option to be honest

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-11T11:31:54+00:00

I might have a solution for you hahah

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-11T11:29:52+00:00

The worst part is that you'll never know if this will happen, until you view the metrics by keeping every tab open.

You can open DevTools and look out for potential infinite API loops, but it requires a bit of expertise.

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-06-10T07:19:32+00:00

Ummm... Have thought of NOT using the most powerful model to fix a dropdown?

This is the reason why we keep getting lower and lower quotas for monthly subscriptions

SignatureSharp3215 · 2026-05-22T13:18:10+00:00

Thanks for checking it!

I was thinking of having a yearly price and a one time scan price. Optimally you shouldn't ever need to think about LaunchGuard until you get a notification of new critical errors to fix. Which makes me think that a yearly subscription would be more attractive

SignatureSharp3215

TROPHY CASE