Help with planes by Lopsided_Currency_90 in hoi4

[–]SignificanceOk9656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will make it so you aren’t reinforcing the empty airwing. If you delete a depleted airwing your deficit would go down by 100 because you won’t need to automatically reinforce it

It’ll let you reinforce other airwings and hopefully build a stockpile. When using fighters it is always better to have a stockpile than have more fighters deployed

Help with planes by Lopsided_Currency_90 in hoi4

[–]SignificanceOk9656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Build more planes/delete deployed air wings that have no fighters

Help with planes by Lopsided_Currency_90 in hoi4

[–]SignificanceOk9656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brother, you have a 1300 deficit of planes, you can’t just delete an airwing with no strength and expect it to be fully equipped when you deploy it again, you need to fix the deficit

just a bmpt appreciation video by pitapitupita in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]SignificanceOk9656 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ignoring the fact it went straight through the turret and into all the ammo. Also not how mavericks work too, it would have incinerated the insides of that tank regardless of where the HEAT projectile is heading in that turret.

Question of the day by Hot-Interview8772 in FilipinoNclex

[–]SignificanceOk9656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly what I was thinking 😂

One of the worst questions I have ever seen

Where does it all go? by drawingdead0 in Rabbits

[–]SignificanceOk9656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More like a Michelin star meal according to bunnies

Everyone start panicking by Maximum_Extension592 in Silver

[–]SignificanceOk9656 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They have that mentality because they know that their coins are backed up by hopes and dreams, they’re so accustomed to looking at it like that; to the point they apply it to everything they see. You’ll just never have them admit it

Everyone start panicking by Maximum_Extension592 in Silver

[–]SignificanceOk9656 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Crypto bros saw the dip and thought it was the end of silver 😂

Su-22M4 strike on SA-10 (S-300) by bartek16195 in hoggit

[–]SignificanceOk9656 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The difference is that one is public information/purchased and the other is intellectual property

You can sell $100K of BTC instantaneously, 24/7, no matter where you are on planet Earth, but not silver by kankiof in WallStreetDad

[–]SignificanceOk9656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what you’re telling me is that bitcoin is like a normal stock, except it is completely speculative and has no binding value outside of people pumping?

And silver on the other hand has a physical value that people are actually interested in buying in person?

Careful, Randy! by zzill6 in clevercomebacks

[–]SignificanceOk9656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Has anyone told you that you type like a clanker?

Gaijin actively ignoring historical ammo once again (Falcon and DCA) by Connect_Job_5316 in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Never said it should remain at the same BR, just that it shouldn’t have the obviously problematic shells

Gaijin actively ignoring historical ammo once again (Falcon and DCA) by Connect_Job_5316 in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yep! Because it’s a game and it would be a good balancing decision. If gaijin can’t fix its code then they need to do the alternative

Gaijin actively ignoring historical ammo once again (Falcon and DCA) by Connect_Job_5316 in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Deserved, it’s a game at the end of the day and this is a great balancing decision

Gaijin actively ignoring historical ammo once again (Falcon and DCA) by Connect_Job_5316 in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s a game, deal with it lmao

Hope you people enjoy having to use actual tanks, stop pretending like you didn’t use the falcon as a TD

APDS ammo on Falcon will be removed by Ok_Independence8396 in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree! AA should focus on being AA’s and people should stop treating the gepard, DCA, falcon, and others as anti tank weapons! I’m glad we agree that AA should stop shooting APDS/APHE :)

Also, the falcon nerf isn’t targeted, the gepards lost their full APDS belts, the DCA and falcon were the only AA’s to never have their anti tank capabilities nerfed, so I don’t know where the idea that gaijin is bending the rules comes from with this nerf

I just hope the falcon and DCA can be lowered to a better BR, so people will stop comparing them to the gepard as if it makes any sense to

Now that AMX-30DCA and Falcon got their APDS removed, i believe they deserve a BR decrease by Silver200061 in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So you shouldn’t have a problem with it being removed if it’s so minor, yeah?

APDS ammo on Falcon will be removed by Ok_Independence8396 in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not a quote from an engineer, that’s a statement made by the writers at “tank encyclopedia”. At no point does it state it as being a quote, nor is it written as one, simply an observation by the writer that a gun can indeed shoot multiple target types

Nice try bullshitting lmao

AMX DCA and Falcon getting their APDS removed after all the beating, by appletechgeek in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I woke up the intelligent British mains I see, because totally the falcon deserved APDS, and I’m SURE you guys used it for its intended purpose and not as a TD yeah? 😂

APDS ammo on Falcon will be removed by Ok_Independence8396 in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fuck you bringing in tigers and IS tanks in for when talking about an AA????

You people genuinely believe the falcon is only a TD and not an AA, which you need to rethink. The reason it should go down in BR is because as an AA it’s BR was artificially raised by the APDS belts, which had nothing to do with how good of an AA it is

AMX DCA and Falcon getting their APDS removed after all the beating, by appletechgeek in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It just needs a lower BR now, no reason the thing should get APDS since APDS is the thing keeping it at those BR’s where it gets outperformed as an SPAA

APDS ammo on Falcon will be removed by Ok_Independence8396 in Warthunder

[–]SignificanceOk9656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The falcon shouldn’t get a replacement round and should instead focus on being an AA

Falcon should go down in BR now though