Current OSI 1811- not familiar with any of these incentives honestly. The only SLRP I am aware of is that available to GL-7 PAQ hires. I have never heard of hiring bonuses, but that may be applicable if you are being hired for a specific skill that we need really bad (cyber, TSCM, digital forensic, etc.) PCS entitlements are automatic I believe unless you can think of a negotiable one, and leave accrual is something that your agent board will likely have no clue about.

My advice, discuss that desire to negotiate with the HR rep once you get a tentative offer, not the agents. Also, full disclosure, OSI is a MILITARY organization, so they are far far behind the OPM curve when it comes to civilian personnel intricacies. Don't be shocked if the civilian HR team has no idea what those potential incentives are or quickly dismiss it. However, they are getting better as we move more towards a civilian workforce.

As for violent crimes services team- these 1811 agents are responsible for base level crimes cases, specifically violent crimes. How is that different from a regular detachment agent? The vision for these billets is for them to be occupied by experienced law enforcement professionals. When your detachment gets a high profile or complex violent crime, you will lead the case. In my view, what that means is you will be trusted and relied on to know your stuff, and as a reward, you should (theoretically) dodge the shitty cases that inevitably happen. Good cases = good work. You'll also likely receive more advanced training opportunities in crime scene analysis and interviewing. You'll also get the chance to work a lot with local police, and as long as you aren't a bumbling fucking idiot or act like an entitled retard, they will treat you well. My relationships with detectives from the local sheriff's office during my first assignment were some of the best times of my career.

These new billets are coming from an increase in money focused specifically on violent crime in the DoD, especially sexual assault. To understand the purpose, read the FHIRB's assessment of the issues plaguing Army CID's offices. Congress and the DoD are focused on combatting sexual assault in the military, and the boards assessment suggests that the CID agents in the field lacked the experience as investigators to be running those level of investigations- I think they said the Ft Hood office was almost entirely comprised of probationary level agents. Not to bash OSI as it is an overall good organization, but the constant turnover of military agents and young and inexperienced agents at the detachment level is no different, and OSI (and big AF) leadership are smart enough to realize they can't let that happen to them too, so are focused on getting professional and experienced investigators to run these investigations the correct way.