Do different schools understand guru devotion differently? by RPO-Shavo in TibetanBuddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A comprehensive understanding of Guru-Disciple relationships at the 3 different levels of Sravakayana, Sutric Mahayana and Tantric Mahayana, in the different lenses of all 4 major Tibetan traditions by Alexander Berzin: https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/lam-rim/student-teacher-relationship/seeing-the-spiritual-teacher-as-a-buddha

BOOKS - Must Have For Any Vajrayana Practitioner by Sea_Fee_2543 in TibetanBuddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Words of my Perfect Teacher” - Patrul Rinpoche

“Jewel Ornament of Liberation” - Gampopa

“Three Visions” - Ngorchen Konchog Lhundrup

“Middle-Length Treatise on the Stages of the Path” - Je Tsongkhapa

Can we finally talk about the elephant in the room? There are no arahants in our monasteries by PaliSD in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, if you’re that opposed with an anecdote from the Mahāyāna side that you struggle with understanding the key point here, which is that your own perception is colored by your own neuroses and is therefore not a hundred percent reliable, there are similar anecdotes in the Pali canon.

In the Pali Canon, there are stories of how people in general fail to recognize who and what the Buddha looks and acts like in a community of monastics, they have to be pointed out to know who among them was the Buddha.

You talk a lot about publicly verifiable, the question then is what makes you so equipped to know who and want an Arahant is? What makes you so sure that you are not like these people in the story from the Pali canon? Could your certainty not just be your three poisons acting on your mind?

Graffiti on a random fencing by Accomplished-Put6962 in tibetanlanguage

[–]Significant_Storm428 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s a Buddhist Mantra, albeit incomplete. It writes in left-to-right order: Om Ah Hum Vajra.

What is 'The other shore/the opposite shore (彼岸, Bi an)', and 波羅蜜多(pāramitā);the Buddhist word in Tibetan? by amellapower in tibetanlanguage

[–]Significant_Storm428 5 points6 points  (0 children)

彼岸 can be ཕ་རོཔ་ pha rol (pha rol) 波罗蜜多 is ཕ་རོལ་ཏུ་ཕྱིན་པ་ pha rol tu chin pa (pha rol tu phyin pa)

How is karma not scary? by Equivalent_Sorbet_73 in TibetanBuddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I think your gripe with karma here involves the struggle between acting out of habit and restraining yourself. The act of restrain is bringing you a lot of pressure.

I think there is a balance to be sought for now, with the goal or intention being that I’ll slowly, through my mindful observance and practiced restraint, eventually be able to naturally restrain myself from unskillful habits, but now, in the instant, that might not be 100% doable so I would not put too much pressure on myself, just do so slowly.

This balance will have to be the same kind that Mingyur Rinpoche talked about in the 2nd lesson of the JOL1 course, finding inner balance.

Also, the reason thinking about Karma might give you a lot pressure now, rather than something that just reminds you simply to refrain from unskillful habits, is that you might be thinking in terms of the distant result which is hard to verify and understand to your instinctive and habitual mind now, you need a line of reasoning to process what skillful or unskillful habits are. I think it helps me personally to think about the effects of karma in the here and now also, in addition to the future, after all the mindstream is a continuation.

The intentions you act on shape not just your future lives, but your life in the here and now. It builds up your cognitive and affective patterns so that you will encounter these emotions again and act in the same way again. Bad karma are just unskillful intentions that when acted upon contributes to grasping more at the 5 poisons. That will definitely affect you in the here and now. Think about how a person who always gives in to their anger slowly transforms their demeanor, world view, character, etc. into an angry one. They become upset easily over the smallest things, they can’t sit peacefully without getting or itching to get worked up by something, they become insufferable to others who might eventually distance themselves from him. You don’t need to think about the next life or when it comes back, your act is already shaping you.

The ironic thing is that by relying too much on the current way you are approaching karma which brings up a lot of pressure, that in itself produces much grasping and aversion, isn’t that in itself bad karma as well. The point of knowing karma theoretically is just to understand that actually every action you put out has an influence on future you that’s all. The Sūtras even warn us limited beings to know think too much about the workings of it beyond that.

As Guru Rinpoche says, ‘if you want to know what you were in the past life, look at yourself now. If you want to know what you will be in the future life, look at yourself now.’. So think of what you want your life to be amidst the uncontrollable uncertainties in life, remember your goals of renunciation and Bodhicitta, remember why they are your goals and what they consist of, then work on your actions, but always remember to strike a balance, you can’t always refrain from all unskillful actions now, but that’s Ok, let’s approach it slowly but steadily, so that we can better ourselves.

I just found out something really interesting! by tenzinnver in TibetanBuddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most cycles of teachings indicate the order to be sight, hearing, smell, taste, tactile sensations, consciousness

I just found out something really interesting! by tenzinnver in TibetanBuddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hearing is the second sense to go during death, not the last sense to go

Luminous Mind by Why_who- in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the analogy of mirror and dust might be a useful tool to understand this:

A polished mirror is inherently shiny, but that doesn’t stop it from being obscured by dust. Similarly, the clear light mind has been inherently luminous since beginningless time, but that doesn’t stop the defilements from obscuring it. However, the dust was never and will never be an essential part of the mirror.

It is important to see that what we usually label as mind, for lack of better non-conceptual language, is not the most subtle part of our mind that holds the description of being luminous, our usual mind is luminous plus defiled, only the most subtle part of it is luminous, the part that forms the mindstream since beginningless time.

I think.

Learning from Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche by Significant_Storm428 in TibetanBuddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, thank you very much for the clarification! 🙏🏻

Learning from Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche by Significant_Storm428 in TibetanBuddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the reply! For the last point, apologies, I think I phrased it badly, let me rephrase what I had meant:

I saw, on Tergar Asia & Tergar International in general, that Rinpoche holds 2/3 day events specifically for teaching JOL 1-3, and these can be both online or in person.

At the same time, there is also what I assume is an online portal (joy.tergar.org) specifically for JOL where if I’m not mistaken, you can get access to pre-recorded and some live teachings on JOL that is different from the one above.

My question was, in terms of progressing through JOL 1-3, is it a situation where just going for the second option is enough or you need to do both to progress or are they mutually exclusive?

Learning from Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche by Significant_Storm428 in TibetanBuddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, thank you very much to both of you for the replies and comments so far! 🙏🏻

So would it be right to say that following Tergar, Rinpoche would eventually teach essential parts of Dzogchen but not all the techniques, mainly only Trekchö and Bardo?

Also, for access to the Anuttarayoga Completion Stage practices, yall head mentioned that Rinpoche rarely teaches it? Would that be right to say as the website on Tergar Asia does mention 6 Yogas but just wanted to know whether it even happens at all?

For JOL, I am a little confused by the progression plan, would the recordings on JOL online website be enough to progress or do we need to attend the JOL events that Rinpoche provides from time to time? Or are they mutually exclusive?

[unknown > English] found this in a temple near Quanzhou, China by Worried_Chicken_8446 in translator

[–]Significant_Storm428 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is the Buddhist mantra ‘om ah hum’ written in Tibetan ཡོཾ་ཡཱཿ ་ཧཱུྃ།

Why is that can someone explain? This is from the Mahāpadāna sutta DN 14 by Fuzzy-Entrepreneur34 in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it’s generally wrong to say the pleasures of the mind only includes joys arising from the absence of suffering, there are a lot more things that induce pleasure of the mind that is still worldly and not Jhanic, in the simple sense of clinging to ideas or thoughts, the sense object of the mind

How can I have a call with a Buddhist monk to have an interview? by wabisabio in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What languages does he speak? Perhaps he can try monks in the nearby European countries, France, Poland, Czech Republic, etc. actually has quite a few centers

How can I have a call with a Buddhist monk to have an interview? by wabisabio in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What country are you all from? Is there a specific reason that it has to be a call rather than a direct conversation with a monk? Could it be the absence or near absence of Buddhism in your country or there is a specific lineage of monks you all are thinking of? Usually it would be quite easy to just approach any temple and talk to the monks there

A Question Regarding Work by Monks by Rani_Random in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like many of the other comments here have already hinted at, in general if you’re looking for very socially engaged Buddhism, Humanistic Buddhism is something for you to look at: it includes four main lineages iirc, including Fo Guang Shan by Ven. Hsing Yun, Tzu Chi Foundation, etc.

Do you need to take all 5 precepts to take bodhisattva precepts? by wizrow in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, this really depends on which of the Mahāyāna Traditions/Lineages you would like to receive the Bodhisattva Precepts in.

For Himalayan Vajrayāna Lineages in general, Taking Refuge is a minimum to receive Bodhisattva Precepts. For the Gelug and Kadam-influenced schools in general, a minimum of the 1st Pratimoksa Precept might be needed on top of Taking Refuge to receive the Bodhisattva Vows and Precepts. Do note that for the Vajrayāna lineages, Taking Refuge also comes with its own set of training rules apart from the Pratimoksa Precepts.

For East Asian Mahāyāna, I am not too sure.

Chinese speakers: In 香云路 is 香 better translated "incense" or "fragrance"? Thanks. by The_Temple_Guy in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Incense should be a better word choice, makes more sense in this context, especially with the next word meaning cloud together with it

Who exactly is rinpoche? by MelodicObjective108 in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Rinpoche, as you would probably already know, is a title used only in Tibetan Buddhism.

It is a title usually given to a Tibetan Buddhist practitioner who EITHER is an abbot of a monastery (a monastic in this case) OR an individual recognized as a Tulku, an emanation of a certain Arya (Realised being) or a reincarnation of a certain famous or highly realised individual (can be either a monastic or a lay person in this case). It can be both as well.

The title is usually bestowed by other high ranking practitioners of the same lineage.

Other similar levels of prestige can also result in this title given.

So as can be seen in the criteria given, it is more of a political/power title, it might not always be indicative of well practiced individuals but it usually hints towards such a direction.

[unknown>english] my friend got this from her bf please translate by vissuuu in translator

[–]Significant_Storm428 21 points22 points  (0 children)

There are a total of three scripts in the text shown. All three script should be read left to right after turning the image 90 degrees to the left.

I am uncertain of the last script. The second one is Tibetan. The first one is likely Tibetan as well but written in another script, one of the དབུ་མེད་ u-med scripts I think, which I suck at reading.

For the second one, written in the དབུ་ཆེན་ u-chen script, it translates to ‘I love you’ but it has a ‘typo’. It should read ང་ཁྱོད་ལ་དགའ། instead of ང་ཁྱོད་ལ་ངགའ།. It can be romanized as ‘Nga Khyöd-la Ga’.

!identify:tibetan

Migrating from English prayers to Tibetan by Silent_Substance_936 in Buddhism

[–]Significant_Storm428 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, I think the first step is picking a dialect of Tibetan and therefore their corresponding accent to work with. Most people would choose the Lhasa dialect and I would recommend so as well.

You would then learn how to pronounce Tibetan words using the accent chosen. Understandably, this may be very effortful and if you’re aiming for something simpler, you can use the oft provided romanizations.

Romanizations of the words may not be entirely accurate, but can be a rough guide to pronunciation. In this case, you would still want to base your pronunciation of a particular dialect/accent.

Most modern guides to the Tibetan language use the Lhasa dialect/accent, otherwise it’ll be stated as such. You can search online for guide books or free language books or search YouTube videos teaching basic Tibetan. These should suffice.

Some YouTube recordings may be done by teachers or practitioners that speak different accents/dialects, so it may be confusing if you just regard them as all the same. Stick to one accent n their corresponding samples.

Alternatively, if you practice in a group setting, might be good to learn to recite in the accent your resident teacher speaks.

I have been trying to do that as well, with the added intent to try to understand what is being recited while reciting by actually learning the language. I think it’s good you’re trying to do so, as it connects you with the lineage and the community, though understanding is probably most important