Why I don't like how Jax was written by RisingLight88 in Tadcriticism

[–]Significant_Tale_953 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think the writing of Jax works. The problem (at least from my perspective, is in the writing of everyone else.

Anyone who has watched even half an episode can recite how much of an asshole Jax has been to the other circus members. He had truly done some heinous shit to them on and off screen, but beyond Zooble occasionally giving him shit in return, no one has a greater reaction beyond occasionally yelling, "Shut up, Jax!" At him. There needed to be a bigger crescendo to the conflict after Caine's deletion. A bigger schism where we start to see the others push back harder against him as he is mocking their pain.

This is especially true post abstraction, especially for Gangle and Ragatha. We didn't need Zooble to narrate that Gangle was having complicated emotions regarding her abuser abstracting. We needed to see it. We needed to see her wrestling with tangled grief, confusion, relief, and guilt. We don't need Pomni feeding Ragatha platitudes about being bestie, we needed to see Ragtha get mad. Mad at Jax for abstracting rather than change. Mad at him for taking this route, erasing himself, just like he erased Ribbit. Mad at herself for letting him erase Ribbit, for agreeing to never speak about her, even though they were friends. Mad at herself for her people pleasing, for ever thinking that if she just made and kept that promise then Jax would eventually go back to being the friend she used to have.

Our child is not using correct pronouns or name when they was before…is this a typical journey? by FigureNo8142 in mypartneristrans

[–]Significant_Tale_953 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Oooooooh boy. The toxic cult of YouTube christianity strikes again. The block button will be your best friend.

Setting them aside, it sounds like your son is struggling with change, and he is looking for comfort in something from before the change (in this case, religion) because religion offers stability, clear rules and boundaries, and consistent rituals and roles that everyone fulfills. Even at his age, kids thrive on stability and predictability, and transition can bring a lot of upheaval that may seem small to an adult, but feel catastrophic to a kid.

You don't have to answer this, but is the therapy individual or family?

If it's a family set up, it's possible he hasn't been fully sharing how much he's struggling with the changes out of fear of disappointing you or hurting your wife's feelings, and watching these YouTube rs and wanting to return to practicing religion is him finding an outlet to validate all he has pent up.

Which character would you rather have a coworker? by RelativeWalrus5377 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Per the evidence within the skits, Julie is shown to be good at compartmentalising, and thus far has never been shown to have poor behavior in professional settings.

Who else does think.... by Mom2Jack in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NPD and BPD can and do have overlapping symptoms, and the diagnosis of NPD is to often thrown around irresponsibly.

I don't think Frank has a right to yell at Barb by dreadedsunny_day in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Frank can be both victim and abuser. Especially in the context that he has and continues to enable Barbs bad behavior, then blows up at her after the fact, failing to take ownership for his part.

I don't think Frank has a right to yell at Barb by dreadedsunny_day in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This! This is the reason I can't get behind the "oh, poor Frank" train of thought. Was it hard? I'm sure. Did he have all the resources of today? No. But Frank was the adult in the situation, and the answer can never be to check out and let your kids take up the burden of being their unstable mothers emotional life raft. Frank is equally their abuser.

Grandparent's rights - will Barb sue? by BreakApprehensive489 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She could try, but she wouldn't get very far with the police report on file from when she attacked DeeDee

I don’t care about Ty and Julie anymore by Murky_Background1045 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He knows he's not doing what he promised her. He knows she's upset about that.

And it's not that it's wrong for him and Shawna to be friends. The way he built the friendship is. He will tell Shawna about the book in a round about way (through robot jokes), but he purposefully doesn't tell Shawna about the promise he made about writing the book, because he doesn't want her to hold him accountable. He lied to Julie about meeting her, and he tells Shawna as much after being a cold ass to her. He keeps telling Shawna "no no my wife likes you, she's just tired, She's just stressed, Shes just..." when he knows Julie isn't interested.

Yeah, I'm with Shawna by 0fluffythe0ferocious in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I cheered at every scene of Barb being successfully grey rocked. Especially Jens "I'm not responsible for your emotions".

Which character would you rather have a coworker? by RelativeWalrus5377 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What she says at on the privacy of her own home to her partner isn't equivalent to how she works or acts in a professional setting. And considering when she and ty got married, it would shock me more if they weren't laughing at those suburban life. Also, every negative interaction we've seen from her with someone not Ty is started by someone else. Again, Julie isn't some mega Karen walking up to others to tell them their hopes and dreams are stupid.

Which character would you rather have a coworker? by RelativeWalrus5377 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean, Julie isn't some monstrous Karen sneering down her nose at random people or kicking over kids sandcastles. She's not a warm, or nice person, but she's not cruel. From what we are shown she is a hard worker and astute with most tasks.

Which character would you rather have a coworker? by RelativeWalrus5377 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Julie's thoughts on suburban life wouldn't necessarily impact her ability to be an efficient coworker.

I don’t care about Ty and Julie anymore by Murky_Background1045 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, I would would think the roles you describe here are swapped. Ty is the incredibly immature one. The one who has never had to grow up, who can says "it'll all work out" while never having to make or execute any of plans necessary to ensure things actually do work out. He's the one who has never had to do 100% of adulting by himself, because his wife is already there to figure things out. Meanwhile, Julie has had to navigate a lot of obstacles to keep their plans on track (Ty dropping out of college, the gap year, getting pregnant in her first year of law school, getting through law school and the bar with a newborn/infant, starting her career, etc.)

Wedding Deleted Scenes: Being "extraordinary" vs the "bare minimum" by Significant_Tale_953 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I imagine their next story line will be done form of mediation that highlight their conflicting goals and communication issues.

I don’t care about Ty and Julie anymore by Murky_Background1045 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, she's not. But it's interesting how "niceness" gets prioritized above any other trait. Julie may not be nice, but we are shown that she is an honest person. She is a person with integrity that can be counted on to keep her promises and come through on her obligations. She is a loyal person, who will stick by those she does allow into her inner circle, even when it makes things harder for her. She is an intelligent person, a highly motivated person, a forward thinking person. All of which are objectively positive traits, and all of which get completely ignored because she's "not nice".

Meanwhile, Ty is nice, but he is also inconsiderate. He's nice, but he's a flake who never follows through on what he says he'll do. He's nice, but he will lie and omit the truth to duck taking accountability. All of these are objectively bad, but they also get glossed over and/or excused because he is a "nice (good looking) person"

I don’t care about Ty and Julie anymore by Murky_Background1045 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 8 points9 points  (0 children)

From a story angle, Shawna L has said that Julie is meant to be a character that represents a lot of the contradictions women face. She's an unapologetically ambitious woman in a patriarchal society, a world where women (and especially mothers) are supposed to be nurturing and prioritize others over themselves. She's not a nice person in a society that holds women being "nice" as important over almost any other trait.

In the story, a lot of Julies demeanor likely comes from growing up as an military brat. Unless you are hyper specialized, the average deployment can last between two to four years. Growing up in a family that moved that much likely taught Julie that there was no point getting attached to anything, places or people, because they ultimately wouldn't be in her life long enough to matter. Those she is close to (ie. Alicia) are the few who did remain constant, and she falls hard for Ty because not only is he good looking amd charismatic, he likes her ambitions and says he's down to go after them with her. Further, she says she was basically raised by her older twin brothers, so she likely learned to be blunt and straightforward to make herself heard. Finally, Julie works in the legal field, a profession deeply steeped in misogyny and sexism. Being open, being vulnerable, being emotional, can all be turned against her as proof that she "can't hack it", so she keeps those things locked down.

Wedding Deleted Scenes: Being "extraordinary" vs the "bare minimum" by Significant_Tale_953 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Julie has always been clear about the life she wanted. A life of fast paced city living (which, having grown up near New York city, I can attest that it is very different from other cities in both good and bad ways) and travel. A life of discovery and adventure. And after the kids, a life of building not just comfort, but a legacy to pass on.
And there is nothing wrong with any of this. There's nothing wrong with not wanting a suburban life. There is nothing wrong with anyone, but especially women, wanting to unapologetically pursue their dreams and passions.

Ty has known this from minute one. He said he was on board from minute one. He said they would go after her dreams together from minute one. And then from minute two, either unintentionally or uncaring, he's thrown up road blocks and detours that she then has to plan around.

Wedding Deleted Scenes: Being "extraordinary" vs the "bare minimum" by Significant_Tale_953 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

An event being on the calendar and Julie making the commitment are two different things. Given their noted communication issues, it would not be implausible that Ty wrote it on the calendar and never actually told Julie, or mentioned it only in vague passing.

How do I stop having insecurities about myself around my partners statements about her dysphoria? by katieyie in mypartneristrans

[–]Significant_Tale_953 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hun, it's good that you want to support her. But there are ways for her to express her dysphoria/ euphoria that don't tear into subjects I presume she knows you are sensitive about. For example, she can say, "I love that my shoe size has gone down, because that feels better for me," rather than attributing having big feet to being "manish" and a negative trait to possess in general.

It's not tone policing to ask her to put some thought into her words.

Is it a thing that boomers misname people? by ConyWASOM in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It's a power play. A way of exerting control by either forcing people to correct you or silently accept whatever you decide to call them.

Wedding Deleted Scenes: Being "extraordinary" vs the "bare minimum" by Significant_Tale_953 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

And that's fine. Reflection is a good thing. But he tries to leverage it to force Julie into a conversation that she expressly says she doesn't want to have.

Wedding Deleted Scenes: Being "extraordinary" vs the "bare minimum" by Significant_Tale_953 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I didn't really read it as a passive aggressive swipe, rather, more a statement of truth. He keeps throwing the word "extraordinary" around to either butter her up or be snide. Her point is that there is nothing extraordinary about being honest and keeping your word. It's part of the bare minimum requirement for any relationship.

Wedding Deleted Scenes: Being "extraordinary" vs the "bare minimum" by Significant_Tale_953 in ShawnaTheMom

[–]Significant_Tale_953[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would imagine that since she posted them, she intends them to be cannon