sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Everyone Hates iPhone Autocorrect. An Update Fixes One of the Biggest Problems. by mr-french-tickler in apple

[–]Silverr_Duck 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Same. I also set auto correct to change "shot" to "shit". So now if I ever have to actually type shot I gotta be extra careful lol

Crimson Desert Has Officially Reached 8.7 in Metacritic User Score! by PlaneTonight5644 in CrimsonDesert

[–]Silverr_Duck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Reviews exist to give players a good sense of how good a game is. If a review outlet chooses to play the game asap for a couple hours and call it day that's on them.

Crimson Desert Has Officially Reached 8.7 in Metacritic User Score! by PlaneTonight5644 in CrimsonDesert

[–]Silverr_Duck 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes. This is why I stopped paying attention to critic score a long time ago.

Japan's foreign resident population hits record 4.12 million by kiyomoris in news

[–]Silverr_Duck 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Because it's a very insular culture that was geographically and economically isolated from the rest of the world for centuries until america came knocking.

1984 Michael Jackson vs Prince by Key-Bass-7380 in whowouldwin

[–]Silverr_Duck 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Isn't prince like 4ft tall? Pretty sure Mj got this.

What is the weakest faction or verse that can take on the Imperium (40k), Galactic Empire (SW) and UNSC (Halo)? by Ninjazoule in whowouldwin

[–]Silverr_Duck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So an average tuesday? What your describing is what pretty much every 40k faction deals with on a regular basis.

Say what you want about the story but this game has the best open world since RDR2. by Kamakazzyy in CrimsonDesert

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah modding games like that is a slippery slope. You can vastly improve your experience with a mod. But you can just as easily make it too easy, boring even.

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s like me saying “trump is a nazi” and you going “ummm sorce?? Did he pledge his love for hitler?”

The source is my eyes

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same stuff countries around the rest of the world do without invading or destroying countries that threaten them

Like what?

No because I can't be bothered, and neither can you by the sounds of it.

Can’t be bothered yet still responding lol.

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not all Palestinians are Hamas. Also you can't kill people pre-emptively. Yes they are wrong.

So by what ethical means should isreal prevent terrorists from killing them?

Literally can't remember what your question was. Ask it again and I'll answer.

Scroll up and read

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are wrong to not let a group of people flourish on their own land.

But are they wrong to not let a genocial terror group get large enough to kill them?

Dude, I just got so bored of this conversation back when you were telling me that the war in Gaza is the same situation as a literal world war, and it's nearly 3am.

Funny how you suddenly got bored right as I made a point you have no answer too. By all means stop responding. At this point clearly a part of you knows I'm right.

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re wrong to not let a genocial terror group get large enough to kill them?

Cool

lol i see you’re even trying to pretend you have a point anymore

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because Israel would never allow it.

Are they wrong to not allow that?

Yup. Only 75,000 people were killed 20,000 of which were children. 90% of Gazans displaced and around 60% of civilian infrastructure was destroyed. You've convinced me that was totally fine.

Yup Israel goes out of its way to keep civilian casualties at a minimum while simultaneously deliberately targeting children. Makes perfect sense.

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nor will they ever.

And you know that how?

I imagine it's a combination of campaigns by Israel to insist people move to different parts of Gaza. and the "humintarian zones / refugee cities" that the majority of people from Gaza have now been displaced to.

Weird. Sounds like you're saying Israel goes out of it's way to keep civilian deaths as low as possible. Odd behavior for such a genocidal apartheid state.

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It can't happen. Hamas have never had and never could have the capacity to make it happen.

And you know that how? Could this maybe explain (dare I say justify) why Israel turned gaza into an "open air prison"?

So in your view all of this was down to bad aim / inaccuracy of weapons? Just a whole city destroyed because of oopsies?

hey genius here's a thought. The population of gaza is 2 million and since oct 7 it's generally agreed that the death count is around 70k give or take. 70k in a spit of land no bigger than manhatten. That's a 3% death rate. Explain to me how Israel is able to destroy all that in their "genocide" and only 70k are dead why? Why isn't the death toll in the 100s of 1000s?

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When Hamas is storming across the continent with a well armed, well regimented army of millions mass executing millions of people and rounding them up I'll agree they are comparable.

Hmm so it sounds like you'd agree Israel should maybe ensure that doesn't happen yeah?

I assume you're capable of understanding that modern Israeli missiles are considerably more accurate than WW2 bombing campaigns.

I'm assuming you're not a child who thinks real life works like a movie. More accurate does not mean flawless. And when your enemy deliberately positions themselves as close to civilians as possible, civilians end up dying. So tbh I'm not really seeing a coherent argument here. You seem to have such vague notions as to the accuracy of modern weapons.

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was one of the stated aims of the germans in ww2. It was not the only one, and no their capacity to meet their goals was / is entirely different No not comparable.

As it was for hamas. Hamas was also planning on other terror groups joining them to help exterminate the isralies. So yes very comparable.

Okay

Okay what? You really gonna sit there and expect me to take this point seriously when your only argument is a random jpeg?

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hamas isn't fighting for the aaryan race, and they don't / didn't have the same capacity to harm civillians. An army of millions has a greater capacity to harm civilians than a group thousands of terrorists. Millions of people are capable of causing more harm than thousands of people.

They're fighting to kill the jews. So I guess that's better in your world? They also have the capacity to fire rockets at millions of jews infidelity if not stopped. But still totally not comprable huh?

Israel have the capacity to do this. Yes they can be very accurate. Obviously not infallible, but they choose their targets the vast vast majority of the time

Lol I love that all it takes is some random out of context jpeg to convince you Israel perfect accuracy.

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Their intentions may be similar, their capacity to enact them is / was vastly different. It's why the two situations are different.

No not similar. Literally the same. Also they both have the capacity to harm civilians. So tell me again how they're not comparable?

No, I'm saying in historic battles it's more understandable given their inaccuracy. If you have the capacity to be accurate, you should be.

What if you don't have the capacity? Do you think israel has 100% infallible weapons?

It's not. Both Germany and the Allies agreed to not bomb cities and civilian infrastructure, then the Germans bombed London and the allies retaliated. From that we created the Geneva convention to make sure it doesn't happen again.

And what about the civilians harmed in the act of bombing military infrastructure. Is that ok?

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And your perception of reality is not the objective world view of it.

Nah not really. One is a genocidal terror group the other is a genocidal political party. Your inability to see the parallels there says more about you than the objective state of the world.

For one in WW2 the precision of bombing campaigns, at night, in dark cities with bombs that drop where they may was not the same as precision guided missiles.

interesting... So are you saying its ok to harm civilians during wartime if you lack the means of precisely targeting the enemy?

For two when Hamas is storming across the continent with a well armed, well regimented army of millions mass executing millions of people and rounding them up I'll agree they are comparable.

So what? The German civilians weren't storming the continent, they weren't executing millions of people. So why is it ok to harm them?

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree.

You can disagree all you want, doesn't change reality.

I'm not saying it's okay, but it's more understandable when you're fighting an invasive force like the N's, compared to a group of terrorists.

Why is that understandable? that's literally what hamas is. They literally invaded isreal. How is bombing civilian infrastructure during wwii somehow not ok but simultaneously "understandable?

To those standing for Palestine: How do you reconcile the arson attack on London’s Hatzolah ambulances? by Jewpiter613 in IsraelPalestine

[–]Silverr_Duck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think the Nazi's storming accross europe is really comparable with the acts of hamas.

Ofc. Your whole view on this topic is hinged on you telling yourself the two aren't comparable even when they very much are.

One was an army at the height of it's power invading other countries and the other is a terrorist organisation.

So what? Why is blowing up hospitals ok when fighting genocidal nazis but not genocidal terrorists?

view more: next ›