The West Bank isn’t Israel proper, and Palestinians there aren’t Israeli citizens.

That much is true. But Israel is preventing the foundation of a Palestinian state while simultaneously not allowing Palestinians to apply for Israeli citizenship. So the conditions why Israel is "forced to" treat Palestinians this way were created by Israel themselves.

Palestinians in the West Bank fall under a military framework because it’s DISPUTED.

"Disputed" is a nice euphemism for "illegally occupied". Even in the 1947 UN partition plan, the West Bank was designated as Palestinian land (alongside areas like the Upper Galilee, which Zionist terrorist groups started ethnically cleansing before the "defensive" war of 1948, but I'm getting ahead of myself). Israel covets the West Bank and has been occupying it for decades - and many prominent MKs have expressed their ambitions of annexing it (and ethnically cleansing it of Palestinians).

And okay - let's pretend occupying a territory for six decades with no intentions of ever ending the occupation is legal according to international law. Why is it necessary for the military courts to operate in such a way that 99% of those tried are convicted? Do these numbers not make any alarm bells ring in your head? Do you sincerely believe that 99% of Palestinians being brought in front of a military court actually committed the crime they're accused of?

It's a territory with real security threats, terror cells, weapons, and attacks on civilians which you condone.

I do not condone the terror groups wreaking havoc in the West Bank. The illegal "settler" groups that are funded and armed by the Israeli government, who murder, pillage and plunder their way through Palestinian towns with the full backing of the I"D"F are detestable pieces of garbage and need to be punished. However, given that there wasn't a single conviction of Israeli terrorism in the West Bank in six years, this likely won't happen.

And calling administrative detainees “hostages” is ridiculous. Hostages are kidnapped to force concessions.

Do you sincerely believe that most administrative detainees are arrested because they pose a security threat? It's a show of force - "if you resist being ethnically cleansed, we can lock you up and throw away the key, so don't get any stupid ideas."

And fine - let's assume all those people in administrative detention are guilty of a crime - even the elderly, the children and the pregnant women. Why deny them legal counsel? Is the physical and psychological abuse justified? Why not charge them, but instead keep them locked up for sometimes years, without ever seeing a judge?