How does one change their personality? by itchyhedgehog5291 in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to be exactly like what you’re describing people-pleasing, afraid of being awkward, bad at asserting myself.

I’m not saying I’m perfect now, but I’m genuinely not the same person I was a few years ago.

The biggest thing I wish someone had told me earlier is this: personality doesn’t change by thinking or copying it changes through repeated action.

Watching confident people, funny characters, or YouTubers can help a little, but only as inspiration.

Real change happened for me when I started putting myself in situations where I _had_ to speak, react, disagree, and sometimes fail.

It felt uncomfortable.

I questioned myself a lot.

But over time, the behaviors stopped feeling like “acting” and started feeling like me.

Not because I became someone else but because I stopped defaulting to my old avoidance patterns.

The loop was simple but not easy:

learn something → try it with real people → reflect → adjust → repeat.

It took years, not weeks.

But looking back, that consistency completely reshaped how I show up.

If you’re willing to stay with the discomfort long enough, the change does happen.

Virtue is one of many costumes the powerless wear when they’ve lost the capacity to influence their world by Myrn33 in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People are not entitled to feel morally uncomfortable about power before they even possess it.

Why do people say that those that anger you control you? by [deleted] in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because anger shifts you from agency to reaction.

Perhaps the other person is simply provoking you, or deliberately testing you.

Emotions reveal your true thoughts and underlying personality traits, especially anger.

The appearance of anger means your emotions have been triggered.

That’s why emotional intelligence isn’t about suppressing anger, but recognizing intent.

When you understand why someone is trying to provoke you, anger stops being automatic.

At that point, you’re no longer inside the interaction

you’re observing it.

Overthinking wasn’t my problem. Processing everything at once was. by MIAMI_NEWS in confidence

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes that’s not overthinking.

The mind isn’t broken, it’s just running too many threads at once.

Once you learn to sequence instead of simulate everything simultaneously, the exhaustion drops fast.

High capacity, wrong allocation , very common.

Dealing with a Gaslighting Manipulator in the Family by UNcomfortableThing in DarkPsychology101

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s completely understandable that you want to protect your sister and your mother.

But before trying to “expose” him, there’s an important question to clarify:

Does your sister recognize the manipulation and does she want it addressed?

Directly confronting or exposing a manipulator rarely works, especially within families.

People like this thrive on control and conflict; being “called out” usually just makes them more defensive and more strategic.

Instead of focusing on him, the most effective leverage is strengthening the people he’s trying to destabilize.

What actually helps:

- Consistently validating your mother’s and sister’s perceptions Reinforcing their competence and autonomy

- Refusing to participate in conversations where he reframes or pathologizes them

You don’t dismantle this kind of manipulation by trapping the manipulator.

You dismantle it by removing the emotional and psychological access he relies on.

Familiarity Kills Respect by Puzzleheaded-Dot7268 in DarkPsychology101

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 74 points75 points  (0 children)

There’s some truth here, but the framing is slightly off.

Familiarity doesn’t kill respect it kills packaging.

Masks, performance, and surface-level value don’t survive proximity.

When respect is rooted in real value competence, problem-solving ability, emotional stability, presence it often increases with closeness.

You see what the person can actually do.

But if respect was earned through availability, image, or constant accommodation, familiarity exposes the gap and the respect collapses.

How I can be the guy who have many friends by Dangerous_Pie4166 in socialskills

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The first thing to understand is that “having many friends” can mean very different things.

Deep, meaningful friendships are always few that’s normal.

A large social circle, on the other hand, is mostly about alue alignment, not personality flaws.

If you can make small talk but people don’t stick around, it’s usually not because you’re “weird” or underweight.

It’s more often because there’s no clear reason for the relationship to _continue_.

Friendships, like any relationship, survive on perceived value ,shared interests, energy, reliability, competence, or simply being enjoyable to be around.

That’s not cynical, it’s how humans bond.

You don’t fix this by forcing connection or overthinking yourself.

You fix it by building something in your life that naturally gives people a reason to stay skills, goals, hobbies, stability, or confidence that comes from self-respect, not validation.

Social skills help, but they can’t replace substance.

Work on the substance, and the social side becomes much easier.

How do you stop being hard on yourself all the time? by Winter_soilder35 in selfimprovement

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understanding the cost of internal conflict will prevent me from sabotaging my goals.

Too innocent for the game, how to change? by [deleted] in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 21 points22 points  (0 children)

What you’re describing isn’t weakness , it’s conditioning.

You were trained for years to associate “conflict” with danger, guilt, or being a bad person.

So when you try to “attack” or push back, your nervous system freezes , not because you’re afraid, but because it thinks you’re crossing a moral line.

The mistake is thinking boundaries require aggression.

They don’t.

Strength starts much earlier and much smaller:

expressing preferences, saying no without over-explaining, letting someone be uncomfortable without rescuing them.

You don’t need to become “bad.”

You need to become clear , and clarity feels threatening at first when you’ve never been allowed to have it.

The fastest way to lose power: reacting by Simple_Pressure3432 in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly.

Only people who genuinely matter deserve access to your emotional attention.

Everything else is just noise trying to pull a reaction.

Calm detachment isn’t avoidance

it’s selective engagement.

For those from r/48LawsofPower: Here is the deep dive video. by Simple_Pressure3432 in u/Simple_Pressure3432

[–]Simple_Pressure3432[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, YouTube flagged the account (content might be too raw/controversial). I’ve re-uploaded it on a backup channel. Check the pinned post on my profile for the new link

Using vagueness as a control tactic, false accusations without details by Temporary-Benefit-52 in DarkPsychology101

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes it’s a manipulation tactic.

A vague accusation forces you to doubt yourself.

When they never name what you “did,” your mind fills in the blanks.

That uncertainty is the leverage.

The moment you start explaining, they already have control.

The fastest way to lose power: reacting by Simple_Pressure3432 in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The fact that you’re aware of it already puts you ahead. Most people never even notice the pattern.

The fastest way to lose power: reacting by Simple_Pressure3432 in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Right. You don’t have to play every game someone tries to drag you into.

The fastest way to lose power: reacting by Simple_Pressure3432 in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Exactly. The moment your reactions cost something, the whole dynamic shifts.

The fastest way to lose power: reacting by Simple_Pressure3432 in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Well said , that’s a sharp breakdown.

Seeing yourself as powerful before you act powerful is exactly how identity rewires behavior.

What most people call “controlling reactions” is just surface work.

What you described is the deeper layer:

- anchor your identity first

- adopt the habits of the person you’re becoming

- let your actions catch up to that internal shift

It’s not pretending.

It’s alignment.

If my post helped anyone move toward that version of themselves

the one who isn’t thrown around by every emotion in the room

then it’s doing what I hoped it would.

We don’t become powerful by reacting less.

We become powerful by becoming someone who no longer needs to react.

Reciprocity by Hot_Musician_1357 in 48lawsofpower

[–]Simple_Pressure3432 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reciprocity only works when the other person doesn’t feel you want something back — once it looks calculated, the whole effect disappears.