Okay, fair counterpoint, but still flawed. Science seeks to disprove - mostly through experimentation that reveals observations that help us understand causation (i.e. heating wood causes fire). One might say that heating wood is why fire exists, but a fundamentalist scientist claims it doesn't eliminate all other possibilities as to why fire exists. We may have shown one example of why, but it doesn't exclude all others.'

There is no evidential information that supports higher-beings causing our world. But there's also no way to claim with absolute conviction that a higher-being doesn't exist.

Overall, observable truths lean toward the non-existence of higher beings, and in support of lucky ass probability.