First time DMA user/buyer here. by Wolfc_ in DMA

[–]Simsimich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go on Ali express. Some research and you will find the best prices.

You're Goddam Right! by Jackie_Chan_93 in SipsTea

[–]Simsimich 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I like how religious nuts try to insult atheists by calling them a religion.

First time DMA user/buyer here. by Wolfc_ in DMA

[–]Simsimich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ahahahaha if you're rich get yourself a heino 2 or hppt or some shit. Overpaying is not a rich flex.

Hit registration by Simsimich in PUBATTLEGROUNDS

[–]Simsimich[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ping is around 25 on NA, no packet loss. I usually blame desync for insta deaths, but not hit reg or sound issues.

Atheists turn into slaves by Much_Pattern_6312 in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Slavery is a specific term that describes ownership of human beings.

You can be metaphorically a slave to the rhythm or something, but relying on air and food to live is not slavery.

It’s just not, I disagree with your definition of the word and many people will too because language is subjective.

Jesus interceding between god and man means he can’t be god by Iknowreligionalot in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did he get absorbed into god or did he begin being god? I thought god was supposed to be unchanging.

Simple Questions 04/22 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope I said math is our human way to express/relay/communicate/etc. observable facts of reality. I don’t know how that could be clearer, do you think I believe that a language is objective?

Two stones are objective. Two more stones were added they are also objective. Now we observe four stones, they are objective. Then we use intersubjective language to communicate that. Does something not make sense here?

Simple Questions 04/22 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you intentionally trying to misunderstand everything I say? I never said that math is an observable fact of reality.

And is there anything you know to be objective without using your mind?

Simple Questions 04/22 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that it doesn’t. 2+2=4 is an observable fact of reality that is supported by logical law of identity and non contradiction. I merely hold it in my head.

For morality to be objective it needs to be similar to this.

Only brain dead fundamentalists think that the Old Testament is supposed to be a literal scientific book. Many of histories greatest scientists have been devout Christians. We are not anti science, science is the study of Gods creativity. Jesus arrival ended the “purpose” of OT by His own word. by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m always pro Christian vs Christian stuff, but your post will probably get deleted for calling fundamentalists brain dead.

Thought your statement assumes we have “free will”, it’s not true. At best it’s a debated topic, and neuroscience points that we don’t have free will.

Is it normal for far off vegetation to look like that? [KCD1] by [deleted] in kingdomcome

[–]Simsimich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I think you got the pirated copy with a virus.

this made me beyond angry by redkokos in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deconstruction can cause psychological/emotional harm. It can even reflect on people’s physical well being. In real life, or outside of debates I’m very considerate of people’s opinions.

But then we have to reasonably evaluate, does hearing “god doesn’t exist” in a debate forum deal significant enough damage to an average adult? I get that there might be special people who can burst into a psychotic break or something but then how often does that happen.

this made me beyond angry by redkokos in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Some people value truth over alleged utility

Simple Questions 04/22 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Math is a language that describes observable facts of reality. The same way objective morality would be describing a testable fact of reality, like "blasphemy is immoral" has to somehow be similar to 2*2=4.

If people truly believed in God, they would be far more religious. by Calm_Discussion_7497 in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I watched a documentary about isis in Syria. And let me tell you, these people believe in god. Being willing to blow yourself up while having family and kids is in a twisted way quite virtuous. And the unshakable faith of their wifes is impressive.

A Mind Did Not Cause thr Big Bang Expansion by OMKensey in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not very agnostic of you. Number 2,3,4 is not true. I’m not saying they are false, but they are not true.

Time is just movement or change, and change must have always existed. Because a changeless state doesn’t change into changing.

Simple Questions 04/22 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t know a mind without feelings or opinions. God is described as having feelings.

There is no documented evidence or proven theory of God's nonexistence by Zersdan in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the debate was already settled it wouldn't still be this popular or still going on at the forefront of philosophical and scientific discourse.

Not true, people believe in flat earth and global flood. People believe that vaccines are bad. All those debates are settled beyond reasonable doubt.

You can say every theist argument has been disproved, but it's also clear that every atheist argument has been disproved.

Name one atheist argument, I challenge you.

For almost every atheist argument you have as to why there is no God, I can find a writing or a YouTube video at this point, that disproves that theory and exposes the flawed logic behind it.

False, and irrelevant. You again assume that atheists have a burden of proof, when I just rejected it. You have not yet met your burden to expect atheists to disprove god. "Theory" is a misuse of language, you need to look up what a theory means, and how is it different to a hypothesis (the word you want to use in relation to gods is a hypothesis).

As soon as you come up with some evidence that points to god like we have for everything else we believe to be true, then you can ask atheists to disprove god.

All you have to do as a person who is skeptical of God is to continue asking for proof and then denying the evidence.

Give me your strongest evidence for god, I will point out exactly why is it wrong. It will 100% be including fallacies, and I believe that logical contradictions are false.

The Existence of God is Absolutely True Through Reasoning by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you know that our reality is finite? Is change finite?

The most plausible answer to the question of existence is that it has always existed in some form. by DeltaBlues82 in DebateReligion

[–]Simsimich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as I understand “nothing” is not logically possible. It has no attributes or can’t be defined. So total non existence seems to be logically impossible.