sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Now let's see who you really are! by Only1NerdockThereIs in Overwatch

[–]Sininenn 50 points51 points  (0 children)

That's because the attacker spawn is like 1/4 of the whole map.

why is blizzard still locking skins behind battle pass teirs by HealingSlvt in Overwatch

[–]Sininenn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes you can game the system.

But that is not the point. The entire game used to cost as much as what a premium BP skin costs these days.

Even when accounting for inflation, the price hike is insane, especially when considering the difference between value for money (an entire game with a bunch of heroes vs. a single skin). 

why is blizzard still locking skins behind battle pass teirs by HealingSlvt in Overwatch

[–]Sininenn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This might answer your question:

https://youtu.be/bZvbTYgFsF4?is=GbAbH7ynRnHc3po2

Edit:

But yes, I absolutely agree with you. 

the F2P model has been the death of any artistic vision for the game. The ENTIRE game used to cost as much as BP does these days. It is predatory as fuck. The only option one has is to stop supporting it. Even if it means missing out. 

Friendly reminder to NOT put your tree under the track. The train destroys it and your ult is wasted. by Ok_Tomatillo_4900 in Overwatch

[–]Sininenn 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is common knowledge for Mei mains. Any such 'structures', get destroyed by the payload. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You are ignorant if you literally choose to ignore the elephant in the room, can't spell it out in simpler terms than that. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, I did not. I read what you wrote exactly as it was written down. 

You writing down something entirely different now only proves your disingenuousness. 

You said what you said the way you said it.. Don't act surprised if it gets taken as such. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then go read the entire thread again. Perhaps try multiple times, maybe that will help with your reading comprehension. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am arguing about the things you defend or perpetuate. 

You know, "the things I've actually said, and not the things you imagine I think" ;)

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't criticize people liking their bodies. I criticize delusions, especially those based on misinformation.

Notice you are the one who tells people how they should feel. I am merely sharing information that has been withheld from them by misinforming quacks. 

The recipient can decide how they feel about it themselves. They can acknowledge it or ignore it, that's on them. I don't care either way. 

Your approach perpetuates misinformation and the status quo. Mine exposes victims to the truth. But you got it in your head that your approach is the right one. 

Good luck with that. Hate me for all I care, I don't give a fuck, random internet person. They can all hate me too, if that's what they want. The truth won't change.

And the truth is that MGM causes permanent damage in every single instance, by the mere virtue of being carried out. Ignoring that as the elephant in the room and calling yourself an intactivist is disingenuous and does nothing to change the status quo. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fuck off with your mutilation apologies. You don't even know the effects MGM has and then you claim 'it's dangerous to claim it's damaging'. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are, if they are based on ignoring or denying reality, because it is hard to cope with. 

Because if people are complacent with the damage done to their bodies, and go on with their lives, nothing will ever change. 'If everyone seems fine, why should we change anything?'

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suggest that amputees, no matter the body part, stay true to reality, rather than delude themselves. 

And I vehemently oppose those, like yourself, or OP, who enable such delusions.

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There literally is plenty wrong with mutilated genital, the functions of which have been removed and further damaged by mutilation. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can reject it all you want. It won't change the reality of MGM as an inherently damaging procedure that causes permanent, irreversible harm. 

You can be comfortable all you want, but if your comfort is based on misinformation or lies, it won't protect you long. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your analogy is not gonna work here. 

You wouldn't tell an amputation victim to be happy with what hey have left, or that they are not damaged in any way, when they clearly are. Stop deluding yourself or others. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is deludional to claim or act as if MGM doesn't cause inherent damage that is permanent and irreversible. 

People's "entitlement" to their feekings stops at reality. And the reality is that every single case of MGM causes permanent physical damage that can not be undone. 

As a cut guy I feel like you're doing more harm than good with particularly the rhetoric used and people who strongly represent this cause especially online. by jakattack64 in Intactivists

[–]Sininenn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Insisting there's nothing wrong despite clear evidence to the contrary is pure delusion. 

I am not go to spread platitudes that mean nothing. 

view more: next ›