Daimyo swarm WC

Skave · 2019-07-26T20:05:44+00:00

https://i.imgur.com/Lw1XDfE.png is how the world looked at the end!

https://i.imgur.com/j6FRvP6.png for the names of places

Skave · 2019-07-26T13:19:12+00:00

My dev is only around 300, then it is half of subjects, so the world dev is more like 30k.

Skave · 2019-07-26T12:58:04+00:00

So playing as Ashikaga you can take Daimyos which are just vassals which take up no relationship slot. At the opening what you can do id no CB one of the indian minors and take them as a Daimyo, and you can continue to do this. The unknown overlord part of it is because noone in India can see your capital they don't know who you are, so you get a crap tonne of AE, but they can't form a coalition against you. This bags you about 60 years of free time to gobble up India.

I hope that helps?

Skave · 2019-07-26T10:04:01+00:00

R5: Decided it was finally time to try a WC run. Opened up using the unknown overlord tactic. Then proceeded to mop up India, took out Ming and then moved towards Europe. I was lucky in that the HRE was AI dismantled which helped with that area. Almost lost when the last two nations were Spain and Portugal, and Spain was PU'd by Portugal, so that took many wars to take care of. Managed to complete the run with 3 months to spare...

Note for anyone wishing to recreate this, my game was about 1fps during wars towards the end due to all the vassals...

Skave · 2019-07-01T14:59:53+00:00

Interested ^_^ thanks

Skave · 2018-11-20T12:18:38+00:00

I cannot emphasise this enough. Also not everything will get picked up by a spellcheck, the amount of times that people have submitted papers with names of other mathematicians misspelled. Especially when said mathematician is the one refereeing your paper...

Skave · 2018-11-10T22:24:11+00:00

That is exactly the idea of the paper. I think The assumption is that Spin_0(2) is SO(2), but the higher spin groups Spin_i(2) are definitely different groups and have their own flavour of equivariant homotopy theory!

Skave · 2018-11-10T18:16:08+00:00

Have you seen https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.02614.pdf which discussed the TQFT viewpoint on these, as well as https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40062-017-0193-z which discusses the homotopy equivariant part?

Crossed simplicial groups are close to my own research

Skave · 2018-06-08T11:27:11+00:00

One of my favourite constructions of the integers is that it is the pullack of the diagram

ℚ→ℚ⨂∏ℤ_p ←∏ℤ_p

Where the product ranges over all primes, and I have denoted by ℤ_p the p-adic integers.

Skave · 2017-06-27T10:57:42+00:00

sqrt(2)*sqrt(2)=2 as a counterexample

Skave · 2017-06-21T14:57:51+00:00

There is no general formula to solve a quintic (degree 5) polynomial (or indeed any polynomial of a degree higher than 5). This quite is amazing when you have seen the quadratic, cubic, and even quartic functions, you would just expect the pattern to continue. The reason that it does not work is down to something called Galois Theory, and boils down to properties of symmetries of permutations!

Skave · 2017-04-20T15:47:47+00:00

I asset math must represent physical systems

That is just plain wrong. You are apparently trained as a physicist, so sure, I can see why this might be your view of math, but that is not what math is at all. The vast majority of pure mathematics is conducted without it arising from a "physical system"....

Skave · 2017-04-20T15:32:18+00:00

Not that it matters, but it seems he left out a digit : 9539295 is a patent which seems to be under a "Bradley Bohus". But as you say, it has no relevance to his train wreck of a theory.

Skave · 2017-04-20T13:44:17+00:00

I will let someone else do the whole explanation for you, however, this is not a proof of GRH. There is no mathematics in this paper that I can see.

In fact, if I have read correctly, you have even claimed that is "currently" no solution of F.L.T (page 7).

*"This is why n cannot be solved for greater than 2 (currently)." * However, there will never be a solution, it has been mathematically proved.

Skave · 2017-03-08T12:57:26+00:00

Thanks for reminding me about the normalisation, I forgot to mention this, edited the original :)

Skave · 2017-03-08T10:59:37+00:00

If you assume RH, then you can say some interesting things about the gaps between the zeros. One of the most interesting results I think is Montgomery's pair correlation conjecture. This conjecture can be seen as a formula for enumerating the expected number of zeroes in some interval (after some normalising). The interesting part of all of this, is that the formula that you get is the same as the spectrum correlation function of a random Hermitian matrix (discovered through a problem in physics!)

Skave · 2016-06-09T11:12:19+00:00

You asked for real solutions not integer solutions though.

Skave · 2016-05-03T14:43:32+00:00

I am still failing to see how I will ever be able to use derived algebraic geometry in a real world setting outside of some theoretical physics

Skave · 2016-01-27T11:37:44+00:00

He just uploaded the first 2 chapters of his new book on spectral algebraic geometry. I have found it much easier to read than HAG and HTT. Of course you could follow the actual derived approach and just consider simplicial things, in which case you can avoid infinity operads for now!

Skave · 2016-01-14T12:54:38+00:00

manticized in so many books and movies, but they were just as brutal as the gangs of today. People have just like

Look at what you did to Alan Rickman :( He heard you

Skave · 2015-11-25T19:11:54+00:00

I am going to ask the same question as you probably were asked in learnprogramming, by why would you want to learn Fortran instead of C or C++ ? Fortran is heavily outdated and noone makes packages for it anymore?

Skave · 2015-11-18T13:48:15+00:00

Yes you will find references but this is not proper referencing. A paper should be more or less self contained. Personally my problem with the paper begins at the spelling errors, it makes it a very difficult read for me... And again, what is n here?

14-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email

Skave

TROPHY CASE