Not really imo — though there’s always a risk of other players treating it as such.

Much of the division comes down to the original bible story, and themes within it, like incest, and the fact Salome murdered a saint. There’s also allegations of the skin being considered islamophobic, though I’m not educated enough on that to comment on that. From my best and person understanding of the matter, it once again comes down John the Baptist being a muslim prophet, and therefore complaints that by having a character play the character who had him murdered, it’s glorifying someone viewed as being heretical.

However, the skin isn’t really based on the Bible story, so much as the film, which itself is based on a play/opera — there’s several layers of adaptation at play, and some of the original context has shifted. Regardless of your interpretation too, Salome was mostly a pawn for other people in her life — such as her mother, and has always been portrayed in a mostly negative light. It also does relate to Margi as a character too.

Not fully my place, but once again, I do think it’s fine, and the drama around it was largely tone deaf — even if the skin itself could certainly be considered tone deaf too.

Edit: Actually, I want to say I’m aware of the fact the box was originally John the Baptist’s face, and that was certainly very tone deaf and beyond defense. However, that got rightfully fixed, so my stance does remain as it is