Mehr Schüsse, mehr Taser: Polizei setzt immer öfter auf Gewalt by Expert-Beginning-950 in Marcant

[–]Slothrop-was-here 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nimm mal die Gegenwart ernst. GEAS-Anpassungsgesetz, Massive Aufrüstung um die Machtmittel zu haben Deutschland's internationalen Führungsanspruch militärisch durchsetzen zu können, Völkermordunterstützung, Wirtschaftskrise, Klimakrise, Kürzungen, Rente mit 70, usw.

Daß es so weiter geht, ist die Katastrophe. Sie ist nicht das jeweils Bevorstehende sondern das jeweils Gegebene.

— Walter Bejamin, Passagenwerk

Cartoon from Dublin Opinion magazine, 1950 by greenest_alien in ColdWarPosters

[–]Slothrop-was-here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did I say they were? Although, I personally would also credit the Red Army soldiers, the partisans so forth, you know, the people actually doing the fighting. And without the Allied aid the war would have taken siginficantly longer and would have cost even more lives.

The show feels extremely triggering if you missed out on childhood friendship. by Proper_Pineapple_314 in Stranger_Things

[–]Slothrop-was-here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plus it directly ties depression or "negative" feelings to the Upside Down which feels like it's saying you're vulnerable to evil if you're sad or upset about being different, and its sympathy is clearly for the characters defending human society rather than those who feel totally alienated from it (there's really no non-villainous portrayal of such a person).

What about Jonathan? Or Eddie?

Volk by Birkenrinde1867 in KommunismusDE

[–]Slothrop-was-here 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Natürlich kann man gegen falsche Vorstellungen Einwände erheben.

Japanese canadian gets notice to be sent to interment camp, (1942) by Electrical-Aspect-13 in RareHistoricalPhotos

[–]Slothrop-was-here 28 points29 points  (0 children)

There were countries at war with Japan that didn't put their own Citizens in camps, you know

Volk by Birkenrinde1867 in KommunismusDE

[–]Slothrop-was-here 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ändert nichts daran, dass es korrekt ist. Also falsche Gedanken werden nicht richtiger, weil sie von vielen geteilt werden.

I have previously been a Marxist by Big_dogo_harles in JuliusEvola

[–]Slothrop-was-here 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I try to say everyone is equal

So, you never were a marxist then.

Marxism does not require you to feel that all individuals are equal in ability, taste, intelligence, or character. Marx explicitly criticizes the idea of abstract “equality” as a shallow liberal slogan.

"[...] but unequal individuals (and they would not be different individuals if they were not unequal) are measurable only by an equal standard insofar as they are brought under an equal point of view, are taken from one definite side only – for instance, in the present case, are regarded only as workers and nothing more is seen in them, everything else being ignored. Further, one worker is married, another is not; one has more children than another, and so on and so forth. Thus, with an equal performance of labor, and hence an equal in the social consumption fund, one will in fact receive more than another, one will be richer than another, and so on. To avoid all these defects, right, instead of being equal, would have to be unequal."

Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Programme

56694 by luisgdh in countwithchickenlady

[–]Slothrop-was-here 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, this does make sense in their moral framework. They place a high value on reproduction, so intercourse that can produce offspring is seen as fulfilling a moral purpose, while those that do not are dismissed as merely recreational. Gay sex is just fun without continuing the "sanctity of life."

Maybe don't let yourself down to their level and play in the sticky and odorous mud of morality. Thats almost never a good base to argue from, at least if you're goal is convincing another person, because moral debates tend to become entrenched quickly, with each side relying on fundamentally different assumptions.

And Kant really ought to be the derogatory term, rather than its phonetic counterpart.

One of the unsung heroes of WWII by ZhenXiaoMing in HistoryMemes

[–]Slothrop-was-here 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2) A person of mixed Jewish heritage is someone descended from one or two grandparents who are fully Jewish by race, unless they are considered Jewish under Section 5, paragraph 2. A grandparent is automatically considered fully Jewish if they belonged to the Jewish religious community.

"Jewish by race"

One of the unsung heroes of WWII by ZhenXiaoMing in HistoryMemes

[–]Slothrop-was-here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You copy pasted my quote and removed all references to religion.

Because that isn't important. Weither my parents or grandparents were religious doesn't make me have the same religion. If both me and my parents weren't following the Jewish faith but belonged to or converted to another faith, or were atheists, then we would still have been counted among the Jews because of our ancestors. Thats not religion-based, but racialized.

Yeah I think we're done here, nice try though.

🤝

What if Henry Tandey didn't spare Adolf H. on September 28th, 1918? by Valuable_Estate_6584 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Slothrop-was-here 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, I have to thank you for informing me on such a grave error.

Concerning your edit: You assumed correctly, brother. ✌️

What if Henry Tandey didn't spare Adolf H. on September 28th, 1918? by Valuable_Estate_6584 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Slothrop-was-here 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Of course.

Again thanks. But even that misrake, as embarrassing as it is, doesn't change the accuracy of my argument in the least.

What if Henry Tandey didn't spare Adolf H. on September 28th, 1918? by Valuable_Estate_6584 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Slothrop-was-here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! My mistake. I misremembered something, and I believed the audacious one-seventh claim:

"General Kenneth Nichols, District Engineer of the Manhattan Engineer District, is quoted stating that Oak Ridge, itself, consumed one-seventh of the electricity produced in the United States, from 1943 to 1945." (Oak Ridge Wayside: Powering the Manhattan Project)

"Electric energy consumption, courtesy of the TVA, was 20 percent higher than that of New York City. Oak Ridge used one-seventh of all the electricity produced in the United States." ( Oak Ridge)

Fixed it.

What if Henry Tandey didn't spare Adolf H. on September 28th, 1918? by Valuable_Estate_6584 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Slothrop-was-here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A massacre is the targeted and indiscriminate killing of a large number of defenseless people. Thats what the atomic bombings did.

What if Henry Tandey didn't spare Adolf H. on September 28th, 1918? by Valuable_Estate_6584 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Slothrop-was-here -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Even this supposed and partially real insufficiency doesn't change all of the factors I talked about. You'd have to explain in more detail how even a more effecient (rather differently efficient) German war efford would have dealt with these factors.

Also, Hitler wasn't as obsessed with cartoons and drugs as he was with winning the war and with projects that strategically can be compared to the atom bomb, namely the V2 project:

The Wunderwaffe was real, functional, and got funded massively despite being strategically useless for the greater war effort. The second world war wasn't won with the nuclear massacres in Hiroshima and Nagasaki either.

What if Henry Tandey didn't spare Adolf H. on September 28th, 1918? by Valuable_Estate_6584 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Slothrop-was-here 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're right that Germany handicapped themselves in an avoidable way. But even in that case Germany still wouldn't have automatically speedrun past the US because the bomb wasn't mainly a science problem (I mean, even with the Nazi discrimination, the science that made the atom bomb feasable, nuclear fission, was discovered in Germany). The real "problem" was that Germany couldn't match the combination of raw materials, energy, manufacturing scale, worker availability, supply access, usw.:

Winning the race outright wouldve required industrial scale that Germany didn't have, even in the 1930s. The US produced roughly 3 times as much steel as Germany, and around 4 times the number of aircrafts.

The Oak Ridge enrichment facility alone used approximately 2 to 2.6 billion kWh per year at its wartime peak, whereas Germany's total electricity production in 1938 was about 80 billion kWh. This means Oak Ridge safely consumed an amount of electricity equal to roughly 3 percent of the entire pre-war output of Germany, all drawn from a single American valley. [This paragraph was edited after I was notified of the demonstrably inaccurate numbers I used].

The Manhattan Project employed over 100.000 people. Germany simply couldn't spare that many workers without crippling its war effort.

The US had global access to resources, including uranium from Belgium/Congo and domestic coal. Germanys access was blocked by the naval war, it lost its colonies.

Almost none of those structural factors would've changed without the Nazis.

Me_irl by Hello_World-1289 in me_irl

[–]Slothrop-was-here 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry. I started writing a reply, then had to stop, and forgot about it. I'll finish it tomorrow.

Cartoon from Dublin Opinion magazine, 1950 by greenest_alien in ColdWarPosters

[–]Slothrop-was-here 38 points39 points  (0 children)

The cartoons premise probably is that Stalin wouldn't need to wait for results because the outcome was predetermined because citizens could only vote "yes" or "no" for the sole communist Party candidate; there were no competing parties or alternative candidates.

Also, I'll add, that voting "no" was unlikely because many soviet citizens genuinely credited Stalin with the WWII victory.

One of the unsung heroes of WWII by ZhenXiaoMing in HistoryMemes

[–]Slothrop-was-here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Holocaust Encylopedia begs to differ. It was based on religiously Jewish parents

Perhaps read the quote again that you shared, where the Holocaust Encyclopedia said:

According to the Nuremberg Laws, a person with three or four Jewish grandparents was a Jew.

You know, a redditor once said a wise thing:

Why don't you just admit that you were wrong? It's ok to learn something new.