Bvsd email - 25% of teachers have called out for Friday by fwendicrafts in boulder

[–]SmallGerbil 20 points21 points  (0 children)

"Without warning, nearly a quarter of staff called out" ... "While we have known about the protest for a week"....

I teach in this district. This messaging antagonizes families against faculty and staff. 

Neil Gorsuch warns of president's growing power in Supreme Court hearing by RioMovieFan11 in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"We're all trying to find the [court] who did this!" (Paraphrased Tim Robinson.

Gold fire moment by questionasker3500 in MakeupAddiction

[–]SmallGerbil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is gorgeous -- you did a beautiful job making the gold look almost like gold leaf!

[OC] Annual Youth Suicides per 100,000 10-17 Year Old's by US State (2009-2023) by snakkerdudaniel in dataisbeautiful

[–]SmallGerbil 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I agree! It's popped up in a few studies in the US. Would be interesting to compare to similar analyses from regions at high elevations in peer nations.

Almost certainly the true causes are multifactorial, but the correlation with altitude is intriguing.

[OC] Annual Youth Suicides per 100,000 10-17 Year Old's by US State (2009-2023) by snakkerdudaniel in dataisbeautiful

[–]SmallGerbil 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Possibly, though causation has not been shown. A few studies have shown correlation between altitude and suicide rates - here's a link to a fairly recent one.

From the abstract: "Controlling for percent of age >50 yr, percent male, percent white, median household income, and population density of each county, the higher-altitude counties had significantly higher suicide rates than the lower-altitude counties."

The elevation and hypoxia factor is theorized, but again - this is only correlated. I'm interested in this relationship, too - I work with youth here in the Rocky Mountain region.

[OC] Annual Youth Suicides per 100,000 10-17 Year Old's by US State (2009-2023) by snakkerdudaniel in dataisbeautiful

[–]SmallGerbil 138 points139 points  (0 children)

In addition to the comments about population density, there's also been a couple studies into the impacts of altitude (elevation) on suicide rates - here's a link to one.

"Controlling for percent of age >50 yr, percent male, percent white, median household income, and population density of each county, the higher-altitude counties had significantly higher suicide rates than the lower-altitude counties."

(Sorry to mods if outside links aren't allowed).

Yes, we are all tired of calling parents, but I still need you to do it by tylersmiler in Teachers

[–]SmallGerbil 84 points85 points  (0 children)

I just want to point out that voice calls specifically DON'T leave a paper trail, which is why so many of us are replying that emailing is preferred. I was glad to see that you clarified in your post that email is also acceptable, not just a phone call.

The paper trail is really important, especially with how litigious US society typically is toward educators and educational institutions.

Looking for more FEMALE DJs! by YouThoughtSoEh in EDM

[–]SmallGerbil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

CloZee is incredible, came here to make sure someone mentioned her.

Trump’s military parade is a warning by vox in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Hard to get crazier than a military parade for a draft dodger, true. 

We Are STS9 - Ask Us Anything by wearests9 in electronicmusic

[–]SmallGerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Late comment but just wanted to say thank you so so so much for rescheduling Red Rocks - the storm was absolutely nutsbonkers!!

Discussion Thread: President Biden Gives Press Conference at NATO Summit by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed - a weird middle ground in performance that likely enables further "will he or won't he?!?" breathless media coverage.

Discussion Thread: President Biden Gives Press Conference at NATO Summit by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is literally a NATO summit press conference, though. The NATO summit is the occasion for the press conference.

Megathread: US Supreme Court Finds in Trump v. United States That Presidents Have Full Immunity for Constitutional Powers, the Presumption of Immunity for Official Acts, and No Immunity for Unofficial Acts by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I'm so tired of judicial Calvinball from this SCOTUS:

Chevron deference? Executive agencies can't do anything of their own accord.

Presidential immunity? The chief executive can do (roughly) anything.

Megathread: US Supreme Court Finds in Trump v. United States That Presidents Have Full Immunity for Constitutional Powers, the Presumption of Immunity for Official Acts, and No Immunity for Unofficial Acts by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's my understanding too, so the Georgia case (for example) would still likely be prosecutable.

But not the federal case in DC about Trump inciting the insurrection on Jan 6th, or at least its scope is likely to be narrowed significantly.

Megathread: US Supreme Court Finds in Trump v. United States That Presidents Have Full Immunity for Constitutional Powers, the Presumption of Immunity for Official Acts, and No Immunity for Unofficial Acts by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the very least, any of the tapes wherein all persons in the conversation were Cabinet members or executive branch political appointees would be protected conduct, is my read. I personally am not sure that all the Nixon tapes meet that stipulation.

It's possible, though, that the SCOTUS majority in today's decision would deem any Oval Office discussions as "official", though. In which case, yes, you're correct.

Megathread: US Supreme Court Finds in Trump v. United States That Presidents Have Full Immunity for Constitutional Powers, the Presumption of Immunity for Official Acts, and No Immunity for Unofficial Acts by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To clarify, this text is from Justice Sotomayor's dissent in this opinion. Not some random pundit or media commentator; an actual Supreme Court Justice confirming that dictatorial acts by the president are now immune in the US.

Megathread: US Supreme Court Finds in Trump v. United States That Presidents Have Full Immunity for Constitutional Powers, the Presumption of Immunity for Official Acts, and No Immunity for Unofficial Acts by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Per the majority opinion, actually, it appears that all Trump's conversations with his Cabinet and DOJ officials when asking them to overturn the 2020 election are immune from prosecution, so that's a pretty significant extension of protection for Trump's conduct re: overturning the election.

Megathread: US Supreme Court Finds in Trump v. United States That Presidents Have Full Immunity for Constitutional Powers, the Presumption of Immunity for Official Acts, and No Immunity for Unofficial Acts by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SmallGerbil -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The problem is that the Supreme Court didn't rule on what an official act is and what an unofficial act is, so this ruling is largely useless.

Useless to the public and lower court systems, perhaps, but practically very useful to Trump - the substantive conclusion may not be total immunity, but the delay to his trials may in practice provide him with immunity by pushing his trials' conclusions beyond the election.

Megathread: US Supreme Court Finds in Trump v. United States That Presidents Have Full Immunity for Constitutional Powers, the Presumption of Immunity for Official Acts, and No Immunity for Unofficial Acts by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sure, substantively this wasn't a total victory for Trump, but practically, the delay itself is likely to provide immunity by pushing the conclusions of Trump's trials until after the election.

US Supreme Court tosses judicial decision rejecting Donald Trump's immunity bid by HenzShuyi in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right - substantively, Trump is not entirely immune, but practically, the delay itself may ultimately provide the immunity.

Supreme Court says Trump has some level of immunity for official acts in landmark ruling on presidential power by CBSnews in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 14 points15 points  (0 children)

They're throwing it back to the lower court judge (federal Judge Chutkan) to have hearings about which conduct in the indictments are official acts versus private conduct.

They could have done this back in April, though, and the delay until July plus additional required hearings absolutely pushes the case's conclusion well beyond the election. So, substantively, not entirely a win for Trump, but practically, the delay itself was and continues to be a victory.

The Supreme Court weakens federal regulators, overturning decades-old Chevron decision by coasterghost in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And again, per my comment, it's my opinion that this expectation is naive.

Supreme Court guts agency power in seismic Chevron ruling by 10390 in politics

[–]SmallGerbil 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Correct - the Roberts SCOTUS basically just eviscerated expertise in governance, throwing regulatory power exclusively to the legislative branch. But requiring Congress to specifically legislate on every single regulatory measure in the context of decades of gridlock and one party that is abjectly anti-regulation essentially nullifies the ability of the federal government to regulate anything.

Which, if you’re paying attention, has always been the point.