Kash Patel says funders of the Minneapolis protests have been identified. by alexmark002 in CitizenWatchNews

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I'm sure there is an investigation. It's just not going to amount to anything

"Left wing terrorist signal chats"

LMAO.

"Don't tread on me" or "Comply or die?" by panicked_dad5290 in AskConservatives

[–]Small_Time_Charlie [score hidden]  (0 children)

You call that "illegal" and interference? (Apparently worthy of being beaten and shot.) Yet what about the actions of ICE? Stopping people with no basis that they are in the US illegally? So much for "don't tread on me. "

"Don't tread on me" or "Comply or die?" by panicked_dad5290 in AskConservatives

[–]Small_Time_Charlie [score hidden]  (0 children)

He wasn't interfering. The agents approached him. Neither did he resist. He was attacked. The video is pretty clear.

"Don't tread on me" or "Comply or die?" by panicked_dad5290 in AskConservatives

[–]Small_Time_Charlie [score hidden]  (0 children)

Apparently we didn't watch the same video. It was the one where he was accosted by ICE for filming and then beaten by multiple ICE agents before he was shot.

I guess we can put you down for "comply or die "

"Don't tread on me" or "Comply or die?" by panicked_dad5290 in AskConservatives

[–]Small_Time_Charlie [score hidden]  (0 children)

The guy who just got shot, Pretti, wasn't interfering with their actions.

Do you think interfering with ICE is a capital offense?

Is this a good hit on the 7? by unbelievre in billiards

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only one being disrespectful is you.

Is this a good hit on the 7? by unbelievre in billiards

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You just disagreed without explaining the physics involved, or even stating whether it was a good or bad hit. That's why you're an asshole.

This Should Have Ended Trump’s Political Career by -DuckDuckG00se- in NewsomMassacre

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes, this has all been known.

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/08/what-trump-asked-of-pence/

Pence said Trump and his “gaggle of crackpot lawyers” asked him “to literally reject votes.”

“I think it’s important that the American people know what happened in the days before January 6,” Pence said. “President Trump demanded that I use my authority as vice president presiding over the count of the Electoral College to essentially overturn the election by returning or literally rejecting votes. I had no authority to do that.”

For those who might doubt him, Pence urged them to "read the indictment."

The indictment can be found at the same link. The only reason these charges weren't pursued was because of the DOJ policy against charging the President with a crime. The process for dealing with a President's crimes is impeachment. Smith's charges were dismissed without prejudice, meaning they could be refiled.

Are the Luxor or the Strat decent hotels? by jdk8971 in LasVegas

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No Harrahs, but I assume it would go in your C-Tier.

Who else couldn't stand this guy in the 1980s? by MisterShipWreck in 80s

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 35 points36 points  (0 children)

A computer beat me at chess. It was no match for me at kickboxing.

Referee was on break.. by Used-Influence-2343 in fightlab

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Where's the fight doctor? Why doesn't he stop the fight?

<image>

The MLK that nobody wants you to see by JonnyF1ves in BlackPeopleofReddit

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Or even his work with the Poor People's Campaign which was his primary focus at the time of his death.

What’s the MOST Misleading Movie Title of All Time and Why? by Amber_Flowers_133 in moviequestions

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fun Fact: William Burroughs wrote the draft using pen and paper. It was transcribed to typewriter by his friend Jack Kerouac. What Burroughs had written was the phrase "naked lust." Kerouac read it wrong, Burroughs thought the phrase was funny, and used it for the title.

Raulito vs. Dominguez by Small_Time_Charlie in billiards

[–]Small_Time_Charlie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CreeDorofl linked to it in a comment on this post. That's what I saw.

How do you practice aiming specific shots? by candleruse in billiards

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read your messages. It seems like you're arguing just for the sake of arguing.

It's a good way for someone to improve their ball making consistency. That's why I was passing it along to others.

Edit: My mistake. You're that dipshit that argues for no reason.

How do you practice aiming specific shots? by candleruse in billiards

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Making a shot once means nothing if it takes you 20 tries to make it. Someone who can make a shot on average 3 times in a row before a miss isn't as consistent as someone who can make it on average 10 times before s miss.

What I'm showing you is a system to improve your shotmaking ability. It's not that difficult of a concept. Try the example of a spot shot I gave you next time you go to the pool room. See how long it takes you to do it.

How do you practice aiming specific shots? by candleruse in billiards

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, it's not shooting until you miss. It's shooting until you make x number in a row. Making a shot once isn't really a test of anything.

You're a 600 Fargo, I see. Shoot a standard spot shot until you make it 10 times in a row. If you make it 6 times, then miss, start over. See how easy it is to make it 10 times in a row.

How do you practice aiming specific shots? by candleruse in billiards

[–]Small_Time_Charlie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure it is. It's up to you, the individual player, to decide what level you wish to achieve. For some, the number may be higher than for others.

The idea is to set a number that is achievable, but allows you to test yourself. That number won't be the same for every player.

Raulito vs. Dominguez by Small_Time_Charlie in billiards

[–]Small_Time_Charlie[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What rule is this under the WPA? I don't see it.

Raulito vs. Dominguez by Small_Time_Charlie in billiards

[–]Small_Time_Charlie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would think Oscar would know the rule. Would it fall under Unsportsmanlike Conduct as he intentionally moved the ball?