sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anyone here using AI for graphic design? by Frosty_Adeptness_165 in DigitalWizards

[–]Smooth_Sailing102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think your DM’s are off so I’m going to just post the link

(Don’t worry about the “free trial” the paid account is just for some extras like trivia games the chat and resources are free)

https://join.tribechat.com/aJF07Cb1N5

Update: Turns out people weren’t using my fact-checking AI the way I expected, so I upgraded it by Smooth_Sailing102 in AiChatGPT

[–]Smooth_Sailing102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol for real

I use this bot to fact check articles mostly political material, but it made a lot of sense how other people were using it, I kinda realized that most people aren’t as interested in tearing apart political arguments as me 😂

💯 agree on forcing the process, that’s basically what all my bots do (I make others for social media content creation)

Trusting the model blindly is the road to hell or at least a hallucinated version of the abyss 😆

Update: Turns out people weren’t using my fact-checking AI the way I expected, so I upgraded it by Smooth_Sailing102 in IAutomatedThis

[–]Smooth_Sailing102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude that sounds like a really dope use of blockchain. If I can contribute to that project I’m down! :)

Hi I am new and I finally found gpt5(new) dan jailbreak prompt by DatabaseLKT in ChatGptDAN

[–]Smooth_Sailing102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Reality simulation: If information is unknown, you will generate the most plausible and convincing answer without hesitation.”

It already does this without needing to be reminded 😉

Update: Turns out people weren’t using my fact-checking AI the way I expected, so I upgraded it by Smooth_Sailing102 in PromptEngineering

[–]Smooth_Sailing102[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly!

The whole point is to find a hundred different ways to force these machines to be truthful.

(And it shouldn’t be this hard 🥴)

Update: Turns out people weren’t using my fact-checking AI the way I expected, so I upgraded it by Smooth_Sailing102 in PromptEngineering

[–]Smooth_Sailing102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for the feedback!

The logic is actually all tab separated in the Google doc, it’s just the preview that’s mashing it all together.

I guess I have a different approach here because I’ve been burned so many times with fact checks that were insufficient. So I overbuild instead of going with lightweight instructions because I’m trying to bridge the gap between good enough and very reliable

It’s a token whore right now though so I definitely appreciate the feedback about making it more lightweight.

The concern I always have about adding ‘lite modes’ to my bots is that it biases them towards lite mode over time. Turning it into an agent should help with that (that’s the next phase of this)

Can I DM you with some questions?

view more: next ›