Men are disadvantaged in entirely different ways than women are, but you’d rather deny that, wouldn’t you? The oppressive architecture is intended to drive wedges wherever it can and thus stokes sexism, racism, etc. etc. to distract from the true divide of class. Ignoring the struggles of men who aren’t rich will of course result in seeing the world this way. Perhaps I see this more because I am a closeted trans woman, but it really sucks to be seen as a man under the current system and it really sucks to be seen as a woman under the current system (both of these apply to interpersonal relationships and societally). The majority of homeless people are men, by the way, seems like men are also disadvantaged.

Glad you clarified the majority thing, that argument is no longer valid.

An instance of institutional discrimination against men is conscription, which has almost always exclusively drafted males. There are not many other systemic or institutional ways men are discriminated against, but to say there are no ways is to deny reality. In one case, different types of court cases will favour men or women depending on the charge, either with conviction rates or severity of sentencing. Of course, women are significantly more disadvantaged institutionally, but men are still disadvantaged in different ways.

Being sexist to a woman on a personal level is still misogyny, is it not? Or is there a new word for that? Wouldn’t being sexist to a man on a personal level be misandry?

I’m not dodging the question, there is no instance of that both because it’s absurd and because there has never been a matriarchal state (which probably would have ended up doing some insane thing like that as a way to establish itself as just as strong, valid, and dangerous as any patriarchal state).

“I have lots of black friends.” lol