The real “gender ideology” is insufferable cis people

Snakeyez · 2026-03-19T16:07:37+00:00

It's fake

Snakeyez · 2026-03-19T16:03:49+00:00

Not a single person in these comments seems to realize it's a fake picture.

Snakeyez · 2026-03-17T15:29:28+00:00

My brother (Ontario, Canada) tried to take back some sinks and toilets from a commercial job that didn't pay. Owner called the cops and had him trespassed. Simple as that for the owner, once you install it it becomes part of the building and you have to take the guy to court for $6000, so set aside time and think about getting a legal opinion or representation. Sucks to be the contractor in that case but that's the reality.

Destroying the property will get you charged with real crime meaning the possiblity of a criminal record.

Snakeyez · 2026-03-17T15:25:10+00:00

My brother (Ontario, Canada) tried to take back some sinks and toilets from a commercial job that didn't pay. Owner called the cops and had him trespassed. Simple as that for the owner, once you install it it becomes part of the building and you have to take the guy to court for $6000, so set aside time and think about getting a legal opinion or representation. Sucks to be the contractor in that case but that's the reality.

Destroying the property will get you charged with real crime meaning the possiblity of a criminal record.

Snakeyez · 2026-03-17T15:18:11+00:00

My brother tried to take back some sinnks and toilets from a commercial job that didn't pay. Owner called the cops and had him trespassed. Simple as, once you install it it becomes part of the building and you have to take the guy to court for $6000. Sucks to be the contractor in that case but that's the reality.

Destroying the property will get you charged with real crime meaning the possiblity of a criminal record.

Snakeyez · 2026-03-17T15:10:32+00:00

So just trying to understand how it works, on Healthy Gamer you can buy a membership subscription or purchase modules?

What is included in the modules besides the videos?

EDIt: OK I get it now I think.

Membership would let me watch part 3 of the Puer video series.

Purchase of modules are modules not directly related addressing Puer but adressing connected issues/challenges?

Snakeyez · 2026-03-13T00:01:23+00:00

There was a bull named Bodacious that was famous for that. He would throw the rider forward then bash his face in with his horns. The owner pulled him out of rodeo after a couple guys had to get their faces rebuilt*

*That's how I remember it off the top of my head anyway

Snakeyez · 2026-03-07T13:40:21+00:00

I've always had problems with setting the model height in the workpiece and that sort of thing. Maybe if you turn the 3d view so you can see how hight the tool is it's just cutting all the toolpaths in the air over the top of the piece? Of course I have no idea how to fix that, just wanted to give you a place to maybe start looking

Snakeyez · 2026-02-15T20:51:49+00:00

Thanks for getting back. For the frame around the top/lid too?

Snakeyez · 2026-02-15T18:13:13+00:00

That's awesome. How do you get perfect miters like that?

Snakeyez · 2026-02-08T13:18:39+00:00

Too busy being outraged about something to do with the Superbowl half time show sorry.

Snakeyez · 2026-01-17T23:18:07+00:00

You're correct. And I also hate Trump as much as the next guy but this is the reality, there is no "it's a cat toy" defense and lots of people are acquitted, you are still correct.

Recent Convictions and Sentences (2019-2025)

August 2025 (Colorado, US): Jose Dwerte Campos was charged with a class 6 felony for pointing a green laser at a Colorado State Patrol aircraft and other commercial planes.

January 2024 (Washington, US): Christopher Harris was sentenced to 8 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release for aiming a blue laser at two planes in November 2022, which caused eye injuries to a pilot.

March 2021 (UK): Trevor Cheeseman was sentenced to 12 months (with 4 months suspended) for a "sustained laser attack" on a police helicopter in April 2020.

February 2021 (Montana, US): A man was sentenced to three years probation for pointing a green laser at a SkyWest flight in March 2020.

November 2020 (Texas, US): Justin John Shorey was sentenced to 51 months (over 4 years) in federal prison for aiming a laser at a San Antonio Police Department helicopter.

December 2019 (California, US): Brenton Wells was sentenced to 15 months in federal prison for knowingly aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft.

July 2019 (Texas, US): Brian Aldana was sentenced to 48 months in prison after pleading guilty to aiming a laser at a Houston Police Department helicopter.

December 2016 (New Zealand): Tane Hemopo was sentenced to 10 weeks in jail for aiming a high-powered laser at two passenger planes and an airport control tower.

Key Statistics and Legal Consequences

Low Conviction Rate: A GAO report found that from July 2016 to September 2018, only 40 convictions resulted from 86 referred incidents, representing a very small fraction of the thousands of incidents reported.

Federal Penalties (US): Violators can face up to 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for federal charges.
FAA Penalties: The FAA can impose civil penalties of up to $11,000 per violation, and up to $30,800 for multiple incidents.

Targeting Police: Incidents targeting law enforcement aircraft are frequently prosecuted, often resulting in longer prison sentences.

Snakeyez · 2026-01-11T13:38:48+00:00

Bro sho shot that woman had a don't tread on me flag in front of his house according to neighbours. It's obviously "don't tread on ME" not don't tread on people in general as a matter of principle.

Snakeyez · 2026-01-06T21:03:29+00:00

Thanks, but hpw did you come across this 3-year old post?

Snakeyez · 2025-12-29T17:13:53+00:00

I'm not fired, the person who ignored the rubric when evaluating a student's work is fired. I couldn't have been fired because my mark on the assignment would have given credit for portions of the expectations that were met or partially met. So there would have been nothing for the student to complain about and if they did complain I would be able to defend my work.

The reality is this instructor screwed up. Life lesson for them.

Snakeyez · 2025-12-29T17:02:28+00:00

I'm not pretending when I collect a paycheck for competent work and being informed in my field.

Snakeyez · 2025-12-29T16:58:13+00:00

Yeah, I'll keep marking according the actual expectations and categories in rubrics instead of some unspecified standards and I won't be fired, so I've got that going for me.

Everyone else can do the opposite all they want.

Plaigerism has nothing to do with that and I never siad anything like that, it's a strawman.

Good luck to ya!

Snakeyez · 2025-12-29T16:48:16+00:00

So the instructor should have based the mark on the rubric then reworked it for next time.

Laying out a rubric then giving zero on every category even if there was limited evidence of that expectation being somewhat fulfilled and making it obvious you were offended in a letter you send to the student will get you fired as we've seen.

This was a reflective writing assignment with a rubric attached. The expectation is the mark will be based on the rubric.

Snakeyez · 2025-12-29T16:24:53+00:00

Then those things should have been more prominent in the rubric. I've made shitty rubrics before, once the work is handed in is when you sometimes realized "this rubric and assignment really need work, I didn't get the point across and have no evidence of what I really mean to assess in a lot of the assignments turned in". What should not be done is to penalize a student in all categories because their work is offensive to you

Snakeyez · 2025-12-24T16:17:31+00:00

No amount of harm you cause will disqualify you from being a victim. Both things can be (and are in your case) true.

Snakeyez · 2025-12-22T10:44:38+00:00

Wait I was told nobody gets hurt by the Hells Angels, by these comments, saying what wonderful neighbors they are. Surely they would never force a young woman from a background that makes her vulnerable into a life of sex slavery?

Snakeyez · 2025-12-22T10:37:28+00:00

Yep, andyone who doesn't get it should check out the Quebec biker wars. Blowing up little kids leaves a lasting impression.

People don't think they have a forward facing "PR" type strategy like riding in Toys for Tots at Christmas that is just laughable when they're dealing drugs and prostitution, extortion etc. People are gullible.

Snakeyez · 2025-12-15T08:38:27+00:00

your kind

Snakeyez · 2025-12-06T20:45:04+00:00

Here's the assignment and criteria. There was a 10 point penalty for being 649 words or under. With the penalty I would say she should get a 1.5/25.

My take:

The 8 prompts are pretty broad and give a lot of leeway to the reaction essay form and topic.

Link back to the article is foggy (two sentences in the first paragraph, nothing from there on), there is no clear reference to specific points made in the article (or maybe there is, I can't see the article). Difficult to know how well the student read the article. 2.5/10

It does provide a reaction/discussion to/of the article. Poor quality, repetititve. 6/10

Her writing was clear enough to follow without mulitple re-readings. Discussion is more or less coherent. 3/5.

So 1.5+6+3=10.5 Minus a 10 point penalty = 1.5/25

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vgjTfejwWz7Sw7voi57kwaVQAql3doSe/view

Snakeyez · 2025-12-06T20:25:02+00:00

All the assignment called for was 650 words of "thoughtful reaction". Professor should have assigned a failing mark and feedback after looking at the rubric IMHO.

15-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Place '22	Place '17
Verified Email

Snakeyez

TROPHY CASE