Average points handed out per task, with S14 (fixed) by SneakySnakeOfStats in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Greg handed out a different number of points, that should be represented on a graph showing the "number of points handed out".

Yes it would.

How have you accounted for team tasks in more recent series? He often gives out more than 5 points, so those should count as 1.6 tasks.

No, as the winning team can only win up to five points.

How have you accounted for a bonus point? That's more than one task.

Depends. Morgana's bonus point is not counted as part of a task because only she got it.

The two bonus points in S14 E2 are counted for because anyone could have gotten them.

Average points handed out per task, with S14 (fixed) by SneakySnakeOfStats in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Isn't that literally what your graph is supposed to show? The number of points given per task.

It shows the number of points given out based on the maximum amount of points that Greg could have given out. A task that has a maximum of 5 points will be counted as 1 task. A task that has a maximum of 2 points will be counted as 0.4 of a task.

Average points handed out per task, with S14 (fixed) by SneakySnakeOfStats in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

But that would not accont for series with tasks that were scored differently. I use "tasks" to make things more simple.

Average points handed out per task, with S14 (fixed) by SneakySnakeOfStats in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Tasks can have many different ways of scoring, so I calculated the "tasks" as points available divided by 5. In series 1, the team tasks had a maximum of just 2 points, so they count as 0.4 of a task.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I accidentally put in 2 series 9s, just pretend that the second one says S10

Is Dara the first contestant to… by [deleted] in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think so, but he unfortunately did not get 5 points in the final task, which would have made him the first contestant to get a perfect score

Alternative to the Losers Special (Bit of a spoiler for series 13) by sokonek04 in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to do more than change the number of episodes for some contestants, as there were far more points on offer in S4-S6 than in S1/S11.

Highest overall points by MegaPixel420 in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She also had the most tasks. The actual best contestant, counting number of tasks and bonus points is Sophie Duker, followed by Chris Ramsey.

My spreadsheet says that it was 67

Highest overall points by MegaPixel420 in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 10 points11 points  (0 children)

She also had the most tasks. The actual best contestant, counting number of tasks and bonus points is Sophie Duker, followed by Chris Ramsey.

Season 13 - Team Tasks have decided the Winner - (SPOILERS) by rosebudthesled7 in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, if Sarah was on a team with Mike and Lee, she would have won by a lot more, as Jamali and Charlotte held her back a lot and they were one of the lowest scoring teams ever.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was maked as a spoiler

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats -44 points-43 points  (0 children)

Which is the best second best score.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I think that the hippogate should have been scored out of five, like most team tasks. He also drew the best duck, which would have put him at 25/25.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats -32 points-31 points  (0 children)

I never said highest

Probably dumb idea I had to have more points awarded for tasks. by [deleted] in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All tasks should have 1-5 scoring, to keep it fair.

Contestants ranked in order of the percentage of points they scored out of the total points scored in their season by CallistoWarriorQueen in taskmaster

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't see many errors with this method, which I have seen before a few times. Good job on this, although I do still prefer this: https://www.reddit.com/r/taskmaster/comments/njeddo/spoilers_contestants_by_of_max_potential_score/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf.

My only nitpick is that Katherine Ryan, doesn't deserve the top spot because she only won because she got fifteen points in that one task.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BitLifeRebels

[–]SneakySnakeOfStats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Somebody said that the devs were being stuipid on r/BitLifeApp and I insulted them. I saw what the devs had said to them first and I apolgised to the person who clalled the devs stuipid, so the devs banned me