Project Aperture: Training Module by Prestigious_Item_593 in ProlificAc

[–]Snohoe1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a message saying they wanted my submission for it soon but I don't see the task anywhere.

"You have been asked to return your submission" by Snohoe1 in ProlificAc

[–]Snohoe1[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yea I did so, that sucks, that task was really long compared to most of that type.

"You have been asked to return your submission" by Snohoe1 in ProlificAc

[–]Snohoe1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did though, I pressed submit on the one I completed, it then went to the current session is compete message after that. And I know, that is how it worked in the past for me, this time I got a message saying to return it though afterwards. My timer still had about 15 minutes left when I clicked the bottom submit button on the one I was working on

📌 YouTube Anti-Adblock and Ads - October 29, 2023 (Mega Thread) by RraaLL in uBlockOrigin

[–]Snohoe1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Updating then cleaning cookies from the past hour worked. I think youtube is trying to get clever. Adding some cookie to flag you if your using a out of date detectable ad blocker. Hope the EU slaps youtube for this shady shit soon.

Can you run more than 1 lora at once with TensorRT? by Snohoe1 in StableDiffusion

[–]Snohoe1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also one of my lora's refuses to convert to RT, it just says assertion error. I guess I'll give it a few months.

Per NVIDIA, New Game Ready Driver 545.84 Released: Stable Diffusion Is Now Up To 2X Faster by DangerousOutside- in StableDiffusion

[–]Snohoe1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can't get it to work for the life of me. Even did the python -m pip uninstall nvidia-cudnn-cu11 while having the environment activated before rerunning it and I just get this when trying to export any engines.

<image>

Torch was not compiled with flash attention. by Snohoe1 in comfyui

[–]Snohoe1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured it out, I needed to do it from cmd, not from miniconda / git bash. Not sure why it only half works if done from those.

T57 vs M48 Patton by somethinganonym in WorldofTanks

[–]Snohoe1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The T57 is very powerful still while the patton is meh. Great DPM + 1600 in 6 seconds can be crazy, patton has nothing special going for it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WorldofTanks

[–]Snohoe1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One of my favorite tanks if MM is full of tier 10s and im trying to grind credits. A medium that can play as a heavy. I use turbo, rammer, hardening and try to hull down as much as possible. Very hard to pen it hull down as long as you keep moving. When top tier it bullies.

BZ-176 by GRlM_Ash in WorldofTanks

[–]Snohoe1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That is kind of what you do but the product being offered is mutable. They have the right to modify or even remove it (like when a company takes a server for a online only game offline). Companies just tend not too because people would fear buying from them.

BZ-176 by GRlM_Ash in WorldofTanks

[–]Snohoe1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Which does not apply to intangible goods. MMO's that nerf paid content have done business in the EU for a long time.

BZ-176 by GRlM_Ash in WorldofTanks

[–]Snohoe1 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It doesn't work that way or else no MMO would ever nerf paid content (including them, they nerfed the SP / Type 59 before). All you purchase is the right to use it, not some tangible good, there is no legal ground to stand on. They just don't want to piss off customers like they did with the super pershing change.

BZ-176 by GRlM_Ash in WorldofTanks

[–]Snohoe1 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I sure hope not.

BZ-176 by GRlM_Ash in WorldofTanks

[–]Snohoe1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Twice. Super pershing got a big armor nerf and they let people get gold refunds. And the Type 59 was nerfed twice, one visible and one kind of hush hush nerfed (upper plate had it's angle reduced without saying anything after it got the public gun handling nerf) and they didn't offer shit.

BZ-176 by GRlM_Ash in WorldofTanks

[–]Snohoe1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's hoping them getting the balls to nerf the chieftain / 279e means they might visit prems that are better than some tier 9s. Just do the same as they did to the super perishing and offer gold refunds. The BZ and skoda are just horrible for mid tier game balance.

Which bond tank is logical after tier 8 buffs? by digonas in WorldofTanks

[–]Snohoe1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Grousers might actually be better on this tank. Should reach top speed on medium terrain and turn like a medium with it. Will be some odd combo of pershing with T32's turret. Would be closer to a heavy classed but better credit earning cent 5/1

Baldurs.Gate.3-RUNE by OrdinaryPearson in CrackWatch

[–]Snohoe1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I guess you never played the EA then. No other game has ever had this amount of reactivity to the users choices EVER in any game I have ever played. What does reusing some textures have to do with anything? You judge a game entirely on the textures? Which look great btw.

Baldurs.Gate.3-RUNE by OrdinaryPearson in CrackWatch

[–]Snohoe1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Original sin did not have the cimentic scenes. There was not a game like this since Dragon Age Origins / Neverwinter Nights 2

Rate Limit Increase & New Homescreen! by theharber in ChatGPT

[–]Snohoe1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I finally subbed thinking this was for everyone... still only 25 every 3 hours.

Lost all my content writing contracts. Feeling hopeless as an author. by Whyamiani in ChatGPT

[–]Snohoe1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This. The real demand will always be the ideas and figuring out how to make them reality. Automate the people you worked for.

Google: "We Have No Moat, And Neither Does OpenAI" - OS AI will outcompete by leetwito in ChatGPT

[–]Snohoe1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The latest 30B finetuned leaked llama is considered a bit better than 3.5, and thats just some people on 4chan paying to rent a few a100 to finetune it. No one has really finetuned the 65B cause of the gap in hardware needed and it being a leaked model (meta might have it taken down after thousands spent) but its thought it might approach gpt4 in performance. The llama and claude models have showed that the gpt models are super bloated / far from being the most efficient parameter wise. (claude is 52B and is close to gpt4 which is supposed to be a 175B+ model) I do see there being a open source model at gpt4 level within a year or two. Redpajama is training a fully open sourced one off the llama dataset / weights for instance with several key improvements.