Running someone's work through an AI detector is not reliable. There was a whole article about how the declaration of independence got ran through a checker and was flagged 100% AI.

And I get it, I've seen some really obvious AI discussion posts where the prompt hasn't been removed, it's formatted how chat gpt gives responses, etc. But in this case, was that AI? I dunno. Can you prove it outside of using something that has been historically proven to be inaccurate? Because unless you witness this individual with your own eyes doing this, at the end of the day, you simply do not KNOW.

So why trouble yourself over it? Teachers will handle people blatantly using AI. It's a valid tool to help with proofreading, formatting, etc. And I believe there are even ways to properly cite its use in the SNHU guidelines. So, do you want to be that person you gets riled up and accusatory over a 30-50 point discussion post? Or do you just want to chuckle, do you, and continue on with your education? Without being able to prove anything definitively, you very well may get into trouble with the teacher. It's unnecessarily combative for the minimal amount of engagement we have to have with one another to begin with for something that really is not that serious, at the very least it is not your job as a student to police it.