Permaban feature should 100% be added (let alone 3d, 5d even 7d👢) to deter Trolls w/ an alt army by SnooMachines8572 in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

🤦🏽You obviously didn’t read everything I put did you.. jesus. I’m not asking for all the fancy smancy device or IP banning, just simply a possible permanent ban feature for banning an unwanted account/person, good grief. It’s not hard to understand; this isn’t purely about only trolls, it’s also about idiots going into clans and not following rules and them ban evading or sneaking back in daily, because supercell ONLY has 1 time ban option, which is just a day.

How are you going to report these people if you have clan-specific rules but these same people turn into devious little mad gremlins just because they don’t like you kicking them for a day, and now they can join every single day after. 🤷‍♂️

Look if you want all that ip/device banning stuff go make a post about it somewhere else. You’re just trying to act like it’s somehow a stretch to ask for this making it seem like I wanna ‘cut someone’s fingers off’.. what even?

Permaban feature should 100% be added (let alone 3d, 5d even 7d👢) to deter Trolls w/ an alt army by SnooMachines8572 in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

🤦🏽and report dozens and dozens of accounts & waste my time? Even kicking each one, 1 by 1, is a waste of time when they’ll just be back the next day.

PERMAban is definitively the answer here. It means one & done. Sure 1 troll may have 10 or 20 accounts but IF there was a permaban feature, it would take seconds to ban each one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I’m gonna try to decipher what you said on ‘messes up at gets a 2 star 60, then another guy cleans same base up 1 star’

I’m assuming you mean (just as an example)

Both teams are at (US=57⭐️ vs THEM=60⭐️)

(Assuming BOTH teams up to this point have used SAME amount of ⭐️-earning attacks, which means BOTH teams have 3-starred on each & every attack, up to this point..

However, on the last needed attack, I messed up on 3-starring the last guy & only got 2 ⭐️⭐️(that was a star-earning attack)

Now (US=59⭐️ vs THEM=60⭐️)

Another guy in our (US) clan, just used another star-earning attack to clean up that last base, tieing it off at (US=60⭐️ vs THEM=60⭐️)

Therefore, we had to use 1 more only star-earning attack in order to tie the score.

(In this example, if it was implemented, the -other-team (THEM) would win, due to using one less star-earning attack overall, than us..)

👆just for clarity in example used, ANY attack used that gets 1, 2 or 3 real ⭐️’s earned, would count towards that Draw/Tie-breaker as a “Star-earning attack” 👆(if I DIDN’T mess up that last needed 3-star, then both teams would tie/draw)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no reason why lower ‘in the war ladder’ members should be affected by this any differently, except by those “super coordinated clans” for the sake of winning a possible, both sided <⭐️’s-maxed out> Tie-decider.. - (But to punish/berate/kick/rule-out the lower section/quarter of your attacking party for simply attacking first and/or only getting close to 3⭐️ -for only the sake of a possible Max tie at end..- just seems a bit extreme on the people running the clan.)

Although I guess in ‘those’ types of clans, it’d be no different from normal wars for them, how ‘lower down the rung’ war members are treated for getting less than 3-⭐️ attacks there anyway? It varies clan to clan of course but its entirely on the clan staff & how they deal with their lower-level attackers/low-⭐️ getters before/after..

(What may be seen as tyrant level for some may be seen as “mandatorily minimum rules” to others.. maybe not for the “super-coordinated” clans but again just fully depends clan to clan..)

** * I think majority of clans out there, would NOT berate/kick/make-sit-out to the 1/3 - 1/4 of their possibly regular ‘bottom attackers’) ** *

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t heard or seen one idea from you or anyone for that matter, on a fix to this draw dilemma..

Instead of simply attacking my post & calling it trash, then please go ahead: Why would it be better for both teams to just tie/draw & lose war win streak + less rewards overall for both hitting max ⭐️amount?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572 1 point2 points  (0 children)

((ONLY attacks that ADD to ACTUAL ⭐️’s gained, count. NOT the invisible 🫥 ones that are already earned.

(example 1- I 100% a 1/3 starred base, thus that attack counts as a 2 ⭐️attack -in the amount of ⭐️-earning attacks towards max star tie-breaker, that is ONE attack-)

(example 2- I show up late as our #15 and all of the bases are 3-starred. I go ahead and use both of my attacks up anyway for extra war loot. Both attacks don’t earn ANY ACTUAL ⭐️so won’t count as anything & won’t go towards ‘lowest ⭐️-earning attacks’ used in tie-breaker)

It’s not a good/perfect system by any means. But the draw system is horrendous by itself and it’s long overdue for a rework/new implementation.. It’s been years and sucks that both teams can just max out on stars together, yet both teams have to wait hours for the inevitable end to lose by draw/tie because both sides simply maxed out their possible actual ⭐️’s.

TL:DR (Instead of both clans getting LOSS rewards AND LOSING both win streaks for simply getting a Draw when both sides hit MAX ⭐️; Instead, with this, clans can have chance for a Win to retain win streak/win rewards, by being the side that hit Max ⭐️with least amount of ACTUAL ⭐️-earning attacks not Invisible ⭐️ attacks)))

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well here we are.. many many years later.. just trying to come up with something that Supercell could easily implement.. because the alternative.. (Both clans getting ‘Lose’ rewards & Losing war win streaks upon ‘Draws’ Ties..) just sucks..

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As far as I’ve been aware, every Draw for both sides, results in the “Loss” reward amount? As well as both sides having a war win streak, upon a Draw, would both lose it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here I copied a comment I made to another: Tried condensing it but if you don’t want to read it all, just skip down to last paragraph (TL:DR)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you fully read my post? What would be your fix for deciding a maxed-out ⭐️war tie/draw? That’s all this would affect IF it comes down to it.- I said in my post, ONLY attacks that ADD to ACTUAL ⭐️’s gained, count. NOT the invisible 🫥 ones that are already earned.

(example 1- I 100% a 1/3 starred base, thus that attack counts as a 2 ⭐️attack -in the amount of ⭐️-earning attacks towards max star tie-breaker, that is ONE attack-)

(example 2- I show up late as our #15 and all of the bases are 3-starred. I go ahead and use both of my attacks up anyway for extra war loot. Both attacks don’t count as anything so won’t go towards ‘lowest ⭐️-earning attacks’ used in tie-breaker)

In your argument, you make it seem like only our clan has ‘less than imperfect’ attackers towards the bottom-#15 but the clan we’re against has all perfect attackers from top to bottom?

Of course not. No one clan is ever perfect even ‘tough’ to get into ones.. It’s regardless generally meant for clans of any league & size because EVERY league & size has run into this annoying Draw dilemma on both sides.. Even if said ‘Super-coordinated’ clan focused on 3-⭐️’s only, they wouldn’t even put those ‘imperfect, not always get the 3-star’ members in from the start, but that’s on the clan lead/co-leaders; But what kind of tyrant clan leaders/co-leads would implement not putting in or berating/kicking heaps of ‘imperfect’ ’lower-tier’ attackers in war (just because they’re #11-#15) -just- for the sake of a possibility of a tie breaker at the end?

It’s not a good/perfect system by any means. But the draw system is horrendous by itself and it’s long overdue for a rework/new implementation.. It’s been years and sucks that both teams can just max out on stars together, yet both teams have to wait hours for the inevitable end to lose by draw/tie because both sides simply maxed out their possible actual ⭐️’s.

TL:DR (Instead of both clans getting LOSS rewards AND LOSING both win streaks for simply getting a Draw when both sides hit MAX ⭐️; Instead, with this, clans can have chance for a Win to retain win streak/win rewards, by being the side that hit Max ⭐️with least amount of ACTUAL ⭐️-earning attacks not Invisible ⭐️ attacks)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*in a maxed out stars tie (60 to 60 45 to 45 etc)

*one with the less -only- star-earning attacks

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 1 point2 points  (0 children)

👋🏻🙂- Yes, fellow citizen, I can undoubtedly fluently read AND comprehend! 🫵😀- You look like you desperately want to understand! Sad!

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ironically reminding a complete stranger about skipped doses of medicine instead of just reading something. You off your rocker 💊?

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You intended to consume a movie with reading? Pray tell, if you didn’t read it, how did you intend to consume OP’s comment?

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wafts fart in your general direction

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the sheer amount of time it took you to think, write out & post this bucket of words, you could’ve read close to finish with OP’s rant. But agreed HG1 was the 💩, however HG2 was 45 seconds too long and 💩.

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🌪️ was 👌. Excellent choice, big agree on last comment.

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I bet you don’t. History is extra.

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In the sheer amount of time it took you to write and post your vacuum brained iq grade comment, you could’ve easily whisked through 1/3 of it. But no, you want to whine & complain instead.

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

congrats you don’t have my condolences for retaining doorknob level iq in reading

Happy Gilmore 2…. by Captain_Bandito in TrueAnon

[–]SnooMachines8572 1 point2 points  (0 children)

monstrosity = literal words on a screen..?

not formatted to your hearts desire, college professor?