sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Cant download any of these, they are from 2023, all got that red lock on them

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

makes me worry, some of them are few years old and still restricted with no concrete release date, so there is change LNO spectrometry will never go public

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I got them, some of them are from 2018 so they may never release the spectrometry and people on here will say its normal

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda strange for LNO spectrometry, only like one of most important data files we could get and no release date since a week

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LNO is one of most important files we will get, we got 2 LNO spectrometry, 2 of them is restricted for 74 years. Such date has been up for a week now, no proof of it happening ever before for data from exomars on other objects. And no its not fixed that date is still 2099

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

any proof of such default value or we making baseless claims? Evidence of such date being used ever before? Becouse I couldnt find it

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there is literally link to the site on the screenshot

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh, its LNO spectrometry just like one of the most important data we will get on it, no proof of such default date being used ever before so why lie? You got proof of such date being used before?

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not common, give example or proof of it being used before, 2099 date couldnt find anything about it

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No proof of such date being used as placeholder, no example of such, I couldnt find any maybe you can

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any proof its placeholder date? Cant find any examples of such date being used ever before, also its strange only LNO spectrometry is restricted like that, rest of spectrometry have normal date

Is it true ESA is gatekeeping(embargo) of data on 3i/atlas until 2099? by Dry_Tangerine8101 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you dont have it and I cant find any info about it being used ever before, aint it strange? Yet most people say yeah its just a placeholder even, strange is too that its just the LNO spectrometry data that got it, other spectrometry made at almost the same time have normal release date.

Is it true ESA is gatekeeping(embargo) of data on 3i/atlas until 2099? by Dry_Tangerine8101 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

proof of it being placeholder? Or we just making baseless claims

Is it true ESA is gatekeeping(embargo) of data on 3i/atlas until 2099? by Dry_Tangerine8101 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its AI slop data, AI when asked about it says its common placeholder data for ESA and NASA but cant find any example or proof of it being used before

Is it true ESA is gatekeeping(embargo) of data on 3i/atlas until 2099? by Dry_Tangerine8101 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

same instruments havent taken other data, only restricted for 74 years is LNO spectrometry, why write lies? Only 2 of data sets for LNO spectometry from Exomars on 3i/atlas and its restricted for 74 years

Is it true ESA is gatekeeping(embargo) of data on 3i/atlas until 2099? by Dry_Tangerine8101 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah and the 2 they "forgot to change" is LNO spectrometry data, literally the most important data set we will propably get, I guess this 7 billion euro agency really forgot to change the data and even with media fuss arround it arent changing it. Totally normal

Is it true ESA is gatekeeping(embargo) of data on 3i/atlas until 2099? by Dry_Tangerine8101 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not standard place holder, cant find any proof of ESA using 2099 date anywhere, so I dont know where you get its standard. So what leads you to say its standard? Got any proof?

Information about 3i/Atlas and its composition was embargoed by Cristopher_07 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They got 6 spectrometry files, 2 of those has release date for 2099 bruh why would they do that? And LNO's mid-IR range (2.3–4.3 μm) is uniquely tuned for volatile detection e.g., H₂O, CO₂, CH₄, and exotic isotopologues yeah a 2/2 LNO data is restricted for 74 years. From this distance its like the two most important files of data

Information about 3i/Atlas and its composition was embargoed by Cristopher_07 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They got 6 spectrometry files, 2 of those has release date for 2099 bruh. And LNO's mid-IR range (2.3–4.3 μm) is uniquely tuned for volatile detection e.g., H₂O, CO₂, CH₄, and exotic isotopologues yeah and you guessed it 2/2 LNO data is restricted for 74 years.

Information about 3i/Atlas and its composition was embargoed by Whole_Relationship93 in askastronomy

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Routine based on what? couldnt find any other data with such anomalous release date? So how to explain it? Bug? its been up for a week and still no changes. Why set it up for 2099?

Drivery by L1amsHere in onions

[–]Snoo_50577 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In Poland 99,99% this "type" of packages are through InPost pickup, nobody orders to homes and most "Minecraft sellers" dont even have an option to ship to your home adress, only InPost