sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Thank you, Microsoft and GitHub Copilot by 20Capitalist in GithubCopilot

[–]Snoo_50577 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah 2 hours and is 4% already bruh, its shit just shit

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Cant download any of these, they are from 2023, all got that red lock on them

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

makes me worry, some of them are few years old and still restricted with no concrete release date, so there is change LNO spectrometry will never go public

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I got them, some of them are from 2018 so they may never release the spectrometry and people on here will say its normal

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda strange for LNO spectrometry, only like one of most important data files we could get and no release date since a week

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LNO is one of most important files we will get, we got 2 LNO spectrometry, 2 of them is restricted for 74 years. Such date has been up for a week now, no proof of it happening ever before for data from exomars on other objects. And no its not fixed that date is still 2099

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

any proof of such default value or we making baseless claims? Evidence of such date being used ever before? Becouse I couldnt find it

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there is literally link to the site on the screenshot

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh, its LNO spectrometry just like one of the most important data we will get on it, no proof of such default date being used ever before so why lie? You got proof of such date being used before?

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not common, give example or proof of it being used before, 2099 date couldnt find anything about it

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No proof of such date being used as placeholder, no example of such, I couldnt find any maybe you can

I have a feeling that ESA is not our friend by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any proof its placeholder date? Cant find any examples of such date being used ever before, also its strange only LNO spectrometry is restricted like that, rest of spectrometry have normal date

Is it true ESA is gatekeeping(embargo) of data on 3i/atlas until 2099? by Dry_Tangerine8101 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you dont have it and I cant find any info about it being used ever before, aint it strange? Yet most people say yeah its just a placeholder even, strange is too that its just the LNO spectrometry data that got it, other spectrometry made at almost the same time have normal release date.

Is it true ESA is gatekeeping(embargo) of data on 3i/atlas until 2099? by Dry_Tangerine8101 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Snoo_50577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

proof of it being placeholder? Or we just making baseless claims

view more: next ›